tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612445.post1593404780637300099..comments2024-03-23T12:05:23.537-05:00Comments on The Wild Reed: "Glambert" and the New Gay StereotypeMichael J. Baylyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03087458490602152648noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612445.post-45959108299573318572009-06-08T01:19:06.825-05:002009-06-08T01:19:06.825-05:00Adam is awesome! Michael, please do discover just ...Adam is awesome! Michael, please do discover just what's behind his awesomeness! He's really a greay guy and he SHOULD have won Idol. But obviously, America unfortunately was't ready for that. Honestly, that night when the result were announced and when "Kris Allen" not "Adam Lambert" was announced as the winner it dealt a blow to my heart just about as severe and bitter as Prop 8 was... But ultimately, it doesn't really matter, he'll still go far and touch millions of more lives! God has truly given him a gift! Viva Adam!Phillip Clarknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612445.post-72167107468171698552009-06-07T23:31:16.068-05:002009-06-07T23:31:16.068-05:00Like Michael, I've not watched American Idol o...Like Michael, I've not watched American Idol or any of the similarly revolting programs, birthed in Britain, and which Americans find "amusing."<br /><br />I would caution, however, "any stereotype," and Glambert is no more representative of anyone, but an entertainer. If he appeared in that getup in San Francisco, he'd be laughed off the street.<br /><br />He may be talented. He may even be gay (androphile). But he no more represents "all gay men," than I do. On this, Michael and I are in complete agreement.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com