Showing posts with label Leonardo Boff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leonardo Boff. Show all posts

Sunday, June 03, 2012

Believing in the Trinity

Today is Trinity Sunday, and the following excerpt from theologian Leonardo Boff's 2000 book Holy Trinity, Perfect Community was shared this morning as part of the liturgy at Spirit of St. Stephen's Catholic Community in Minneapolis. I found it very insightful and helpful. Perhaps you will too!


What is God like? This is where the Blessed Trinity comes in. We believe that God is communion rather than solitude. It is not a "one" that is primary but the "three." The three comes first. Then, because of the intimate relationship between the "three" comes the "one" as expressing the unity of the three.

Believing in the Trinity means that at the root of everything that exists and subsists there is movement; there is an eternal process of life, of outward movement, of love.

Believing in the Trinity means that truth is on the side of communion rather than exclusion; consensus translates truth better than imposition; the participation of many is better than the dictate of a single one.

Believing in the Trinity means accepting that everything is related to everything and so makes up one great whole, and that unity comes from a thousand convergences rather than from one factor alone.

We never simply live, we always live together. Whatever favors shared life is good and worthwhile. Hence, it is worthwhile believing in this community-style of God's existence, of God's Trinitarian manner that is always communion and union of three.

– Leonardo Boff

Monday, October 04, 2010

Francis of Assisi: The Antithesis of Clericalism and Monarchism

Throughout the world today Christians and people of good will are remembering, reflecting upon, and celebrating the life of St. Francis of Assisi.

Here at The Wild Reed I commemorate Francis by sharing excerpts from Leonardo Boff’s book, Francis of Assisi: A Model for Human Liberation. These excerpts remind us that Francis was, in many ways, the antithesis of both the clericalism and monarchism that remain destructive forces within the Church today.

____________________________


Francis lived the antithesis of clericalism. We should never lose sight of the fact that he was a lay person and wanted to remain such to evangelize the laity who were pastorally abandoned, above all the poor. If later he became an ordained lay person, it was with the aim of being able to preach with greater liberty, since there was a conciliar prohibition that disallowed the preaching by lay people on doctrinal matters. He was never an agent of the clerical system. The astute historian Eduardo Hoornaert calls attention to the mistaken perspective of considering Francis a man of the Church, that is, a cleric with influence among the people. Even today his image is in harmony with the popular culture almost everywhere.

. . . Francis lives the antithesis of paternalism and monarchism in the institutional structure of the Church. The practice of power led to the concentration in the hands of the clergy of the means of religious production. The justifying understanding needed for this practice was developed; here, categories of the most ancient imperial tradition came into play, managed by a political theology whose roots are found in Egypt and the Middle East. The one God-Father is represented by the monarch, father of his people. All the rest are subordinate, organized in a descending hierarchy; it is the kingdom of children. The relationship of the children among themselves is not developed, which would open up the opportunity for the idea of fraternity, but only the relationship of the children to the father. Consequently, there is produced an inflating of the principle of the father, which generates patriarchism from the idea of the fullness of power in only one person. The Church, rooted in this model of political monarchism, appears as a society, in principle, unequal and hierarchical.

Francis lived another experience of faith, tied to the most authentic sources of the New Testament. Because he is poor and unarmed and does not try to impose himself on others, but rather to serve them, he discovers the radical fraternity of all beings. . . . Francis lives [the] experience of Christ as Brother. From there comes the discovery of the umbilical cord that unites all human beings, the understanding of Church as fraternity and as universal confraternization blossoms. All represent the Father to the degree to which they are the children in the Son who is among us; this representation is no longer monopolized by anyone, and if by chance it persists (as a certain understanding of the ecclesial apostolates), it must be lived within the community and among the brothers and not above them. . . . Francis delegitimizes the principle of power . . . substituting for it the principle of mutual service. This experience has profound ecclesiological consequences because it translates the mystery of the Church into categories of the practice of Jesus, and not into those of the monarchism and monotheism of the Old Testament and of the political theologies of ancient imperialism.



See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
St. Francis of Assisi: Dancer, Rebel, Archetype
Francis of Assisi: God’s Gift to the Church
No Mere Abstraction
St. Francis of Assisi and Human Sexuality


Image: Artist unknown.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Dispatches from the Periphery

Earlier today I delivered the following homily to the Spirit of St. Stephen’s Catholic Community - an intentional faith community composed of people who up until March of this year had worshiped at the South Minneapolis parish of St. Stephen’s.

________________________________________


Dispatches from the Periphery
A Solidarity Sunday Homily by Michael Bayly


Spirit of St. Stephen’s Catholic Community
October 5, 2008


First Reading: Philippians 4:6-9

Brothers and sisters: Have no anxiety at all, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, make your requests known to God. Then the peace of God that surpasses all understanding will guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus.

Finally, beloved, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is gracious, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things. Keep on doing what you have learned and received and heard and seen in me. Then the God of peace will be with you.

The Word of God spoken through Paul.


Second reading: An excerpt from Jeannie McPhee’s Solidarity Sunday homily, St. Stephen’s Catholic Church, October 8, 2000.

The Church into which I was baptized and to which I have devoted much of my life and energy regards me as “objectively disordered,” with “radical incapacity to contract marriage,” and judges my relationship with my partner as “intrinsically morally evil.”

Those who know me know that this is not true. . . I can endure the verbal assaults and insults I have received based on my sexual orientation. I can overlook it when I walk in the Pride parade past someone carrying a sign damning me to burn in hell. I can withstand the accusations of frightened and homophobic people.. . . But having the teachings of Jesus manipulated, perverted, and used against me and my gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered brothers and sisters, even if it is sincere, is too much to bear.

Paradoxically, it is this same Church who has taught me that the Church itself is wrong about homosexuality. This is the Church who taught me that God is present in all relationships that are loving, that God is revealed in all relationships that are liberating and life-giving. God is present and revealed in all relationships that embody the qualities of justice, kindness, and equality.

Jesus came for the oppressed of his time and lives in solidarity with the oppressed today. Those who are oppressed and those who work on their behalf know the liberating power of love to convert hardness of heart and transform the world. What is objectively disordered and morally evil is not homosexuality, but the inability and unwillingness of the whole Church to hear the truth, to act fearlessly, and to stand in solidarity with us.

The Word of God spoken through our own Jeannie McPhee.



Gospel: Matthew 21:33-43

Jesus said to the chief priests and the elders of the people: “Listen to another parable. There was a landowner who planted a vineyard, put a fence around it, dug a wine press in it, and built a watchtower. Then the landowner leased it to tenants and went to another country.

“When the harvest time had come, the landowner sent servants to the tenants to collect the produce. But the tenants seized the servants and beat one, killed another, and stoned still another. Again the landowner sent other servants, more than the first; and the tenants treated them in the same way.

“Finally the landowner sent the heir to the estate to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ But when the tenants saw the son they said to themselves, ‘This is the one who will inherit this land. Come, let us kill him and get the inheritance.’ So the landowner’s child was seized, thrown out of the vineyard, and killed.

“Now when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will happen to those tenants?” The chief priests and elders replied, “The landowner will put those wretches to a miserable death, and lease the vineyard to other tenants who will give the owner the produce at the harvest time.”

Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the scriptures: ‘The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; this was God’s doing, and it is amazing in our eyes’? Therefore I tell you, the kin’dom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people that produces the fruits of the kin’dom.”

The Word of God spoken through Matthew.



Homily Introduction

Friends, it’s a great honor to be here this morning, “breaking open” today’s readings in the context of Solidarity Sunday.

My name is Michael Bayly and I’ve been associating, in one way or another, with St. Stephen’s since 1997. For many years I’ve been a member of Spirit of the Lakes United Church of Christ and thus absent at times from this community. Recent events, however, have brought me back, and I’m currently serving on the interim leadership team and have greatly enjoyed working with other community members in planning our recent retreat.

I’ve also experienced a renewed sense of connection and commitment to this community through my work with a number of folks from The Progressive Catholic Voice, as together we’ve produced The Spirit of St. Stephen’s, a documentary video that celebrates the past and envisions the future of what many of us recognize as a Catholic community in transition.

One final point by way of introduction: since 2003 I’ve served as the executive coordinator of CPCSM, the Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities – an independent, grassroots coalition that for almost 30 years has worked to create environments of respect, acceptance, and safety for Catholic LGBT persons and their families. I believe that like this community, CPCSM engages in a profoundly catholic endeavor. We don’t limit God’s presence and action in the world, but are open to discerning such presence and action in the lives and relationships of all. You’d be surprised by how threatening that is for many within a church that claims to be universal, i.e., catholic.

Okay, at this point I should let you know that from now on in this homily, I’m going to use the word “gay” when referring to LGBT people, for no other reason than the fact that “LGBT people” gets to be rather cumbersome in a presentation like this.


Homily: Dispatches from the Periphery

In talking about today’s readings in the context of Solidarity Sunday, I’d like to start by noting that Solidarity Sunday began in 1995 when the Board of Directors of DignityUSA, the nation’s largest Catholic gay organization, recognized that 70-80% of American Catholics supported equal rights for gays and lesbians. It was decided to invite these people to join in solidarity with gay Catholics and to work with them to end verbal and physical abuse – including the “dehumanization” of gays by “religious leaders.”

We heard some of the Vatican’s abusive and dehumanizing language in our second reading. I would advise ignoring such language, in part, because our first reading challenges us to think only about what is true, honorable, just, pure, lovely, gracious, and worthy of praise. Unlike the biblical texts that call for the death penalty for gay people or the dehumanizing documents of the Vatican, our first reading today reflects not the ignorance of a specific time and culture, but something of the mind of God that transcends time and culture and speaks to all of us – male and female, gay and straight. It’s a liberating text. It opens us to new and expanded ways of thinking about God and God’s presence and action in human life. For me, and no doubt for many of you, that’s the hallmark of a sacred text. It facilitates liberation and transformation that is experienced both personally and communally.

Our dear Jeannie McPhee was clearly attuned to such sacred texts – so much so that she became the author of many of these texts herself. Her 2000 homily, of which we just heard an excerpt, is an inspired, prophetic and sacred text.

The words, indeed the very lives, of many gay people serve as sacred texts in our living tradition. And these texts impart a very clear message, and that message is this: contrary to what the Vatican insists, gay people can and do experience sexual relationships marked by justice, wholeness, and life-giving love. We can, in other words, discern truth, honor, justice, purity, love, and graciousness in these relationships.

Furthermore, we recognize and celebrate such qualities as a result of what we, in the words of Paul, have learned, received, heard, and seen in that boundless realm of love we call God. It’s a realm that often calls us beyond the known and challenges us to think “outside the box” of convention and orthodoxy. It’s in this realm that many of us – gay and straight – have allowed our lives to be transformed into living testimonies of integrity and grace.

Sadly, many in positions of influence within the Church refuse or are incapable of recognizing and celebrating such living testimonies. Indeed, a devastatingly clear case can be made that when it comes to acknowledging and honoring the sacramental reality of gay people’s lives and relationships, the institutional component of Roman Catholicism, throughout its history, has demonstrated a profound lack of wisdom and compassion.

We all know just how bad it has become in our own archdiocese. (1) And it’s really no wonder that gay people are leaving the church in unprecedented numbers. They simply do not feel supported or validated even by communities that once prided themselves on their welcoming and affirming reputations. (2)

This to me is a clear indication that the “official” Roman expression of Catholicism has reached a point where it is incapable of producing the fruits of God’s kingdom for the vast majority of people who identify as “Catholic.” Why the “vast majority”? Because it’s not just a gay issue. It’s an integrity issue. And it impacts anyone who takes seriously the living tradition of our faith. Having said that, it can’t be denied that it is issues of sexuality and gender that often facilitate this crisis of integrity.

This is because when it comes to such issues, the majority of those in positions of authority within Roman Catholicism are like the tenants in today’s Gospel reading. They’ve been entrusted with an awesome responsibility to discern and articulate the presence of God throughout the people of God. And yet when God comes and speaks to them in the lives of women and of gay people, their response is one of rejection and abuse. And because the Christ Spirit that was incarnated in Jesus lives in each one of us, it is crucified anew whenever the sexist and homophobic words and actions of the institutional Church cause abuse, pain, and even death.

Yet we can also experience resurrection.

I came back to this community because I’m convinced that if there’s any hope for the Catholic Church to be a sacrament of God’s unconditional love for all, it’s to be found within communities like this that have moved, in a sense, to the periphery of the tradition and thus to a place where its members can be open to the Spirit beyond the life-denying clericalism and doctrinal fundamentalism that dominate and control the center. Our welcome of gay people to this Catholic community is unambiguous. We can and do “walk the talk” – but only because we’ve consciously walked to the periphery.

I take great courage and hope in what theologian Leonardo Boff has to say about the periphery. He writes that: “It is on the periphery where life flourishes in all its exuberance and as a challenge, [it’s on the periphery] where those who hope and live at the margin of all organization, find the necessary soil for the creativity and emergence of what is new and not yet taught.” (3) Sound familiar?

Using St. Francis of Assisi as an example, Boff observes that “the periphery is where the great prophets arise, where the reforming movements are born, and where the Spirit flourishes. The periphery possesses a theological privilege, because it is there that the Son of God was born.”

My friends, I believe Christ continues to be born in the lives, relationships, and faith communities that find themselves, either by choice or by force, on the periphery. In this current time of crisis and opportunity within the Church, it’s no longer only women and gay people living and prophesizing from this holy place, but anyone and everyone who recognizes that the hallmark of our Catholic faith is not rigid adherence to church doctrine but the seeking and embodying of compassion and justice within the context of a pilgrim church still very much growing into truth.

In conclusion, I think we’re all familiar with Pope Benedict XVI’s statement that he wants a smaller, purer Church, and that unless people can support everything the hierarchy teaches he wants them to leave. Interestingly, such an attitude even has some conservatives worried, with one recently declaring that “the outcome will probably be the de facto collapse of the Church in America. . . . Traditionalists will have won the internal Catholic power struggle, mainly because the progressives will have drifted away. But in the end, the small band of traditionalists will find themselves isolated in ‘a new Catholic quasi-ghetto,’ with about as much influence on the culture as the Amish . . .” (4)

I read this and cannot help but think of Jesus’ words: “The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people that produces the fruits of the kingdom.”

Such people are, of course, those repelled by the idea of living in any type of ghetto; who, instead, are drawn to an authentically catholic Church open to the Spirit; a Church unafraid of journeying, of engagement, of growth and of change. My sense is that the birthing and rising of such a Church is happening right here in this place and in places all across the globe. We’re not “drifting away,” but very intentionally creating Eucharistic communities in the spirit of Jesus and at the growing edge of our tradition.

Ultimately, I don’t think we should concern ourselves too much with questions of who’s in and who’s out of “the Church,” but rather with seeking to discover where “church” is happening; where, in other words, are people being affirmed in their lives of integrity and love; where are people being challenged to be agents of positive transformation in our world; where are they being nourished and renewed by the presence of Christ within and among them. I believe this community is one such place where church is happening.

And I cannot help but think of Rosemary Radford Ruether’s observation that the more the hierarchy stagnates and retreats, the more numerous and freewheeling are the creative initiatives that are springing up at the grassroots (which, of course, is another metaphor conveying the same meaning as the periphery).

It would seem that yet again, “The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.”

My friends, when I say that this is God’s doing, and that it is truly amazing in our eyes, I know that you stand in solidarity with me as a gay Catholic man and as a member of this community of faith and integrity. For this I give thanks and praise to God.

Michael Bayly
October 5, 2008


Above: With (from left) Beryl Wolney, Julie Koegl, and Theresa Mueller,
three of the inspiring elders of St. Stephen’s - October 5, 2008.
(Photo: David McCaffrey)

Beryl and Julie feature in The Progressive Catholic Voice documentary,
The Spirit of St. Stephen’s: Celebrating the Past and Envisioning the Future
of a Catholic Community in Transition. To view the first installment
of this video documentary, click here.


Notes

(1) Just how bad has the situation become? Well, in the years since Jeannie McPhee spoke her inspired words, we’ve witnessed a steady decline of “solidarity” with and for gay people in our local church. For example: Gay support and social groups that once met regularly and announced their meetings in church bulletins have either disbanded or gone underground. Dignity Twin Cities continues to be viewed and treated as a pariah by the chancery and by parishes. One longstanding parish initiative, the annual Pride Prayer Service, has been abolished; the parish-based Inclusive Catholic network has dissipated; a lesbian daughter and her 82-year-old “cradle-Catholic” father are forbidden from sharing on Catholic property their story of reconciliation; the chancery actively promotes the “pro-chastity” ministry known as Courage, along with a scientifically discredited organization that likens homosexuality to alcoholism. And, finally, we have an archbishop who not only vigorously campaigns in the civil arena against the legal recognition of same-sex unions, but who is on record as saying that Catholics who stand in solidarity with their gay loved ones in living lives of integrity are themselves cooperating in a “grave evil.” Yet despite such negative developments, there are signs of hope and resistance.

(2) Case in point: recently the pastor of a local Catholic parish considered by many to be “gay friendly” was interviewed on Minnesota Public Radio. At one point he was asked if he felt free to say what he really thinks about gay issues in the Church. He responded that he does, but that he’s learned to choose his battles and therefore would not share what he really thinks. Sadly, it seems that for many in positions of leadership, gay people are not worth “the battle.” And I say this with the utmost respect for all the good work that some have accomplished. Yet without doubt, when it becomes time to “walk the talk” or, in other words, when there’s an opportunity to go public and declare solidarity with gay people, many balk. And the message that gay people get from this is that we are expendable.

(3) Boff, Leonardo. Francis of Assisi: A Model for Human Liberation (Orbis Books, 2006), p. 101.

(4) Shaw, Russell. “Please Look Behind the Bishops’ Potemkin Village” in The Catholic World Today Report (February 2008).

For other homilies I’ve delivered, see the previous Wild Reed posts:
A Homily for the Feast of the Epiphany
Praying for George W. Bush
On the Road with Punk Rockers and Homeless Mothers
Something We Dare Call Hope
Soul Deep
The Harvest Within the Heart
Somewhere in Between


See also the related Wild Reed posts:
To Whom the Future of the Catholic Church Belongs
What It Means to Be Catholic
Authentic Catholicism: The Antidote to Clericalism
Beyond Papalism
The Holarchical Church: Not a Pyramid But a Web of Relationships
The Two-Sided Catholic Crisis
A Smaller, Purer Vision of Church - And Why it Won’t Work


Saturday, October 04, 2008

Francis of Assisi: God's Gift to the Church

.

In celebration of the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi, I share today the following excerpt from Leonardo Boff’s book, Francis of Assisi: A Model for Human Liberation.

__________________________________


Francis lives the antithesis of paternalism and monarchism in the institutional structure of the Church. The practice of power led to the concentration in the hands of the clergy of the means of religious production. The justifying understanding needed for this practice was developed; here, categories of the most ancient imperial tradition came into play, managed by a political theology whose roots are found in Egypt and the Middle East. The one God-Father is represented by the monarch, father of his people. All the rest are subordinate, organized in a descending hierarchy; it is the kingdom of children. The relationship of the children among themselves is not developed, which would open up the opportunity for the idea of fraternity, but only the relationship of the children to the one father. Consequently, there is produced an inflating of the principle of the father, which generates patriarchism from the idea of the fullness of power in only one person. The Church, rooted in this model of political monarchism, appears as a society in principle, unequal and hierarchical.

Francis lives another experience of faith, tied to the most authentic sources of the New Testament. Because he is poor and unarmed and does not try to impose himself on others, but rather to serve them, he discovers the radical fraternity of all beings. God does not cease being Father. But this Father has one Son who is His substantial image and the only representative of the Father. This Son became human and mixed with God’s adopted children. He was the great Brother among brothers. Francis lives this experience of Christ as Brother. From there comes the discovery of the umbilical cord that unites all human beings, the understanding of the Church as fraternity and as universal confraternization blossoms. All represent the Father to the degree to which they are the children in the Son who is among us; this representation is no longer monopolized by anyone, and if by chance it persists (as a certain understanding of the ecclesial apostolates), it must be lived within the community and among the brothers and not above them.

In this context of ideas the petition of Francis arises in all its logic: “May no one call himself ‘prior’ among us, but rather that all be called without distinction ‘lesser brothers,’ washing the feet of one another”; and immediately afterward adding well-known Gospel texts against power (cf. Mt 20:25-26; Lk 22:26), he delegitimizes the principle of power as a relationship between the brothers and others, equally brothers, substituting for it the principle of mutual service.

This experience has profound ecclesiological consequences because it translates the mystery of the Church into categories of the practice of Jesus, and not into those of the monarchism and monotheism of the Old Testament and of the political theologies of ancient imperialism.

. . . There is then, an undeniable non-conformism in Saint Francis; his plan is not within the institutionality of the day; it is a Gospel plan. But he is a man of the Spirit in such a way that he realizes that the Gospel is not the monopoly of anyone, not even he, Francis; nor of the feudal and imperial Church. The Gospel is a ferment that continually gives life to the whole body, penetrating the institutional form as well as the charismatic moment of the community.

. . . Francis was a gift of God to his Church. It received him not without apprehensions, as it did in an exaggerated way with previous evangelical movements. . . . “The fact that the institution would doubt, distrusting and trying to reduce the original radicalness,” says Tadeo Matura, “shows the reaction of someone who feels threatened. The final acceptance of Franciscan evangelism on the part of the Church shows, however, that answering and adding to liberty form part of its deepest being, in that, far from destroying, it renews the Church.”

– Excerpted from Francis of Assisi: A Model for Human Liberation by Leonardo Boff (Orbis Books, 2006), pp. 103-105.


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
St. Francis of Assisi: Dancer, Rebel, Archetype
St. Francis of Assisi and Human Sexuality

Image: Graham Faulkner as Francis in Franco Zeffirelli’s 1972 film, Brother Sun, Sister Moon.


Thursday, October 04, 2007

St. Francis of Assisi: Dancer, Rebel, Archetype

.

Today is the Feast Day of St. Francis of Assisi.

I’ve been reading quite a bit about Francis these past few weeks, as well as living with Jon Giuliani’s beautiful depiction of him (see detail above). In fact, as you can see from the photograph below, I have this particular portrait of Francis in a simple frame and positioned next to a potted ivy plant, the vines of which grow up and around it. Before this picture sits a candle, usually lit whenever I’m at home.



In recent weeks, this portrait of St. Francis has watched over numerous meetings that have taken place around my dining room table. These spirited and energizing meetings have facilitated the coming together of Catholics dedicated to renewal and reform within the Roman Catholic Church.




We call ourselves “progressive” Catholics because we are drawn to participate in the Church’s wondrous capacity to grow, change, and evolve in ways that ever increasingly reveal God’s transforming love in our midst.

Later today, after months of brainstorming, planning, networking, and writing, this group of Catholics will launch The Progressive Catholic Voice, an online journal that will serve as a forum for reflection and dialogue within the local Catholic community, and as a means by which the progressive voice of this community can be developed and unified.

Several weeks ago I suggested that we consider St. Francis of Assisi as the patron saint for both this online journal and the coalition of individuals and organizations behind it. Accordingly, each issue of our monthly journal will contain the following inscription: “Dedicated to St. Francis of Assisi, who heard and responded to God’s call to ‘repair my Church,’ and, in so doing, emulated the justice-making and compassion of our brother Jesus.”

Unquestionably, many Catholics recognize that this call to “repair my Church” continues to resound today in a Roman Catholic Church that, at its worst, is corroded and weakened by clericalism, hypocrisy, intellectual dishonesty, a profound lack of imagination, and a monarchical mindset and structure totally contrary to Jesus’ egalitarian model of community.

Yes, my friends, there is much work to be done!



The “ultimate rebel”

In his book, Sanctity and Male Desire: A Gay Reading of Saints, Donald L. Boisvert suggests that “we all like to think of Francis of Assisi as the ultimate rebel” – perhaps yet another reason why he is such a perfect choice for our journal’s patron saint! After all, you can be sure that there will be some Catholics who will dismiss such an endeavor as the work of “dissenters,” “heretics,” and “rebels.”

Yet according to Boisvert: “Each generation creates its own Francis, and takes from his character and legacy that which appeals most to its sense of priorities” – whether this be his anti-materialism, his simplicity, or his profoundly sacramental understanding and experience of creation. (“For if Francis was anything,” says Boisvert of the saint’s sacramental view of creation, “he was earthy; not the angelic figure of the tacky holy cards, but bold and brawny in his spirituality and in his humanity . . . Francis, the ultimate outsider.”)

As progressive Catholics in the 21st century, we claim Francis’ “profoundly new and uncompromising paradigm for understanding the gospel teachings of Jesus” in the face of a “very rich, feudal, medieval church” (sound familiar?). Francis, says Boisvert, “created fresh ways of understanding relationships and material goods, and the manner in which power, whether religious or secular, should be comprehended and lived out.”

“In his radical yet deeply disturbing simplicity,” Boisvert reminds us, “Francis altered the course of Christian history. He opened new vistas, showing that there are different ways of relating to each other, of ordering our priorities and values, of making sense – just as gay [people] are now doing.”

Boisvert, of course, is writing for gay people – gay men in particular. But we have a broader focus and audience, built on the belief that the perspectives and insights of progressive Catholics are also capable of opening up “new vistas,” and showing “different ways of relating,” of “ordering priorities and values,” and of “making sense” of the important issues confronting the Church – issues related, in particular, to organizational structure, decision-making, and Vatican II’s call for the “full, conscious, and active participation by all the baptized.”


Dancing with the Divine

Another book I’m reading is Following Francis: The Franciscan Way for Everyone by Susan Pitchford. She observes that for Francis, “to be a disciple of Jesus Christ was to be engaged in a lifelong love affair, swept into an intense dance with the Divine.”

“It was a passionate God who called Francis into this dance,” writes Pitchford, “extending a torn hand in invitation. Everything that is distinctive and compelling about Francis’ life followed directly from the intensity of this love: when Francis renounced worldly possessions, he did so that he might embrace the poor Christ unencumbered. And when he took the leper into his arms, the kiss he left on the disfigured face was given to the risen Lord.”

One of my favorite parts of Pitchford’s book is when she relates the story of Francis and the wolf of Gubbio. For Pitchford, this legendary tale serves to highlight how Frances “had the courage to confront his shadow side and be reconciled to himself, and to God.”

Writes Pitchford:

One of the most famous stories told about Francis concerns the time when the people of the town of Gubbio were being terrorized by a bloodthirsty wolf. The wolf had killed several people, and the townsfolk were afraid to leave their homes. So Francis decided to go meet the wolf . . . When he found the wolf, it lunged at him open-jawed, but when Francis greeted it as “Brother Wolf” and commanded it not to harm him or anyone else, it stopped and knelt in submission at Francis’ feet. Francis and the wolf made a deal: the people of the town would provide food for the wolf for the rest of its life, in exchange for the wolf’s ceasing to harm them. The wolf bowed its head and placed its right paw into Francis’ hand, and sealed the deal. So the wolf lived in peace with the people of Gubbio for the rest of its life.

. . . The reason this story has such a central place in Franciscan lore is that it points to Francis’ role as a reconciler of enemies. But a deeper reading suggests that Francis was unafraid to go forth alone and confront the beast within himself. This is a very Franciscan approach to penitence: Francis didn’t kill the wolf – he tamed it so that he could live with it in peace. Likewise, our wounds – even the scary, shameful, self-inflicted ones – shouldn’t become occasions for doing ourselves further violence. They’re to be occasions of mercy, of reconciliation, of peace.


We’re living in a time when many are asking: What does it mean to be Catholic? In relation to many important issues, this question generates strong feelings. It’s so easy to be carried away by our emotions and to say and do things that lack awareness and compassion. (I know that I can tend to dismiss people and their legitimate concerns by labeling them “reactionary.” And only last week, I was referred to as a “sodomite heretic” by another Catholic blogger!).

Without doubt, we’re living through many “occasions” for mercy, reconciliation, and peace. Like St. Francis, my prayer is that we may open ourselves to being vessels of peace for one another. And certainly those of us who have labored to produce The Progressive Catholic Voice see this ongoing project as a positive and proactive endeavor, one that will be undertaken in a respectful tone and in a spirit of love for our brothers and sisters throughout the Church – regardless of how they understand and/or identify themselves as conservative, moderate, or progressive.



Still relevant

Yet another book I’ve been drawn to as I’ve worked with others in preparing The Progressive Catholic Voice, is Leonardo Boff’s Francis of Assisi: A Model for Human Liberation. In this book, Boff shares a wealth of insight on how “some aspects of [Francis’] life make him particularly relevant for our times in this planetary phase of humankind.”

The first of these aspects include Francis’s “introduction of care, heartfelt reason, and emotional intelligence.” I appreciate Boff’s insights on Francis as a “postmodern brother.” For instance, Boff quotes Max Scheler’s description of Francis as “the Western world’s most characteristic representative of the way of relating with empathy and sympathy,” as “no one has better achieved the unity and integrity of all elements than did Saint Francis in the realm of the religious, the erotic, social relations, art, knowledge.”

Boff contends that “essentially, Francis liberated the springs of the heart and the outpouring of Eros” (understood, in the words of psychoanalyst Rollo May, as “desire, hope and the eternal search for expansion,” and described by Boff as “creative spontaneity, freedom, fantasy, and the ability to demonstrate gentleness and care”).

Francis, continues Boff, “achieved an admirable accord” between Eros and Logos [that system of reason that can tend to be antagonistic toward those dimensions of life that are less productive, though more receptive]. In short, Francis “demonstrated with his life that, to be a saint, it is necessary to be human. And to be human, it is necessary to be sensitive and gentle. With the poor man from Assisi fell the veils that covered reality. When this happens, it remains evident that human reality is not a rigid structure, not a concept, but rather it is sympathy, capacity for compassion and gentleness. . . . In Francis, one can see the sovereign rule of Eros over Logos, a communion and confraternalization with all of reality such as has never been seen since.”

Related to this, of course, is the second aspect of Francis’ life that Boff identifies as being relevant for us today. It’s Francis’ “living out of universal kinship,” a trait, writes Boff, which is “crucial today when all cultures and religions encounter one another and can generate conflict and even war, due to lack of dialogue and true encounter.”


“Brother tree”

And then, of course, there is Francis’ “profound ecological stance.” As Boff reminds us, Francis “did not look at nature and all things as lifeless objects to be used, but rather as living members of the creation community that we must respect. He called the Sun, the birds, and the animals his brothers, and the moon, the earth, plants, and flowers his sisters. He cared for bees in winter so that they would not die of hunger and cold. He took the worm off the road to keep it from being stepped on and killed.”

I read this words and chuckle. I have a family of spiders living in my attic bathroom that I simply cannot bring myself to destroy! And the photograph we’re using as part of The Progressive Catholic Voice banner is one I took in the spring of 2005 of a tree by the Mississippi River. Whenever I go to this favorite spot of mine to reflect and pray, I always greet this tree as “brother tree.” It’s not that I’m not drawn to other aspects of nature, but for some reason I’ve always felt an especially strong kinship with this particular tree.



Archetype of the human ideal

And finally, says Boff, “the joy, enthusiasm, and optimism of Francis of Assisi toward life should be highlighted.” These words, too, bring a smile to my face, as I recall the great sense of excitement and energy my friends and I have experienced as we’ve worked to bring to fruition The Progressive Catholic Voice.

And it’s not just been among ourselves that we’ve experienced this energizing and joyful movement of the spirit, but among the many people – priests, religious, lay parish workers, teachers – whom we’ve met with over the past few weeks so as to introduce and discuss our new project. They have expressed great interest in the prospect of a monthly journal containing not only information about upcoming events, but interviews, commentaries, and articles written by and for Catholics who share the call to actively participate in (and contribute to) the ongoing renewal of the Roman Catholic Church.

Without doubt, there’s a heartfelt recognition that the progressive voice, along with the conservative voice and the moderate voice, is essential to the dialogue that is part of any living faith community.

St. Francis of Assisi belongs, of course, not just to those Catholics who call themselves “progressive.” Indeed, he doesn’t belong exclusively to Catholics or even to Christians. As Boff notes: “Through his deep humanity, Francis of Assisi has become an archetype of the human ideal: open to God, universal brother, and caretaker of nature and of Mother Earth. He belongs not only to Christianity, but to all humankind.”


Blessed Francis of Assisi, saint of saints,
wonder of God’s creation, divine rebel, teach us to be like you.
You changed your times. You made possible
a new way of seeing and belonging in the world.
As a community, help us to understand
our own path and our own vision.
Guide us. Sustain us. Comfort and reassure us.
Instill in us a deep respect for the unique gifts of the earth,
as we acknowledge and celebrate their goodness.
We ask for your blessings on our endeavors, and we give
thanks for your holy and timeless example. Amen.

– Donald L. Boisvert
(From Sanctity and Male Desire: A Gay Reading of Saints,
Pilgrim Press, Cleveland, 2004)




See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
St. Francis of Assisi and Human Sexuality
Out and About – September 2007
What It Means To Be Catholic
Joy: The Most Infallible Sign of God’s Presence


Monday, June 18, 2007

It’s Time We Evolved Beyond Theological Imperialism


The above photograph was taken by Evaristo Sa during Pope Benedict XVI’s recent visit to Brazil. It shows the pope hugging children at “Farm of Hope,” a drug rehabilitation center in Guaratingueta, 200 kilometers from Sao Paulo.

For me, this image is a beautiful representation of that ancient understanding of what the papacy should be all about – a symbol of unity within the Church.

In this particular photo the pope is clearly bringing people together – and not just the children who feature in the photograph but those viewing it. Don’t you feel as if you could readily be part of such a loving and inclusive embrace?


Unfortunately, the pope also alienated some while in Brazil. I’m talking, of course, about his startling declaration that the indigenous peoples welcomed the arrival of European priests at the time of the conquest of the Americas because they were “silently longing” for Christianity.


Reaction

According to various media reports, indigenous people throughout South America were not impressed by the pope’s comments. A Reuters article, for instance, reports that Brazil’s Indians found the pope’s comments “arrogant and disrespectful,” “wrong and indefensible.”

The article goes on to note that, “Millions of tribal Indians are believed to have died as a result of European colonization backed by the Church since Columbus landed in the Americas in 1492, through slaughter, disease or enslavement. Many Indians today struggle for survival, stripped of their traditional ways of life and excluded from society.”

“Even the Catholic Church’s own Indian advocacy group in Brazil, known as Cimi, distanced itself from the Pope,” reports the article.


“Theological Imperialism”

I think it’s fair to say that the pope’s comments reflect “theological imperialism,” which author and theologian Darmuid Ó Murchú defines in his book, Reclaiming Spirituality (Gill and Macmillan, 1997), as “the Christian claim (to which Judaism and Islam also subscribe) that our religion contains the fullness of revelation, in the light of which all other religions are deemed to be somehow inferior” (p. 29).

Ó Murchú also notes that such a claim and its promulgation and/or enforcement is both “arrogant and oppressive.”

Am I saying that the pope, personally, is arrogant and oppressive? No, just the theological framework from which he is operating. It’s a “framework” related, of course, to that “strange form of authoritarianism,” that “Big Book of Doctrine” school of theology identified by scholar Gary Macy, and to which I referred in a
previous Wild Reed post.

This particular form of authoritarianism, writes Macy, “fomented both by the ultra-montanism of the late nineteenth-century papacy and by Enlightenment anti-clericalism, understands Roman Catholicism as fundamentally an attempt to provide the definitive answers to all questions, usually in one ‘big book of doctrine,’ whether it be Thomas’s Summa, Denzinger’s Enchiridion, or lately the Roman Catechism of the Universal Church.”

Understandably, such a “school of theology” can easily morph into theological imperialism.

The intrinsic superiority of Catholicism is still an official teaching of the Catholic Church. While some Catholics cringe at such a teaching, others revel in it. For instance, popular satirist Stephen Colbert’s comment, “I consider all religions equal. And by equal, I mean they’re all tied for second place behind Catholicism,” has recently been taken quite seriously (and celebrated) by a number of traditionalist Catholic bloggers. (Tellingly, by their own admission, the rest of Colbert’s humor goes over their heads!)

Recently, an anonymous visitor left a comment in which he asked if I believed that the Catholic Church holds the fullness of “Ultimate Truth.”

I have no problem with the concept of Ultimate Truth but I’ve long concluded that the Roman Catholic Church does not have a monopoly on such truth. Actually, I’ve come to believe that the entire Body of Christ, the Mystical Body of Christ, is what holds within itself Ultimate Truth.

And as Catholic Worker co-founder Dorothy Day noted: “That the Mystical Body includes only the Roman Catholic Church is heresy. The Mystical Body [of Christ] is the inseparable oneness of the human race. . . . In all human creation, there is no one that does not have Christ within.”

Through my theological studies and life experiences, I’ve come to understand Christ as that spirit of consciousness and compassion embodied by Jesus, and which Jesus calls each one of us to likewise embody.

I’ve come to recognize and experience this spirit, this Christos, as the active presence of that reality which is ultimately beyond comprehension yet which nevertheless envelops and infuses all matter. “Christos” and “God” are just two of many names given to the presence and action of this reality beyond and within human experience.*

My point is that the pope’s recent controversial comments in Brazil make sense, if you will, given the orthodox, theological framework he is operating from. That so many people have found his comments to be “arrogant” and “wrong” tells me that the Church as people of God is ahead of the Vatican in evolving beyond “theological imperialism.” Of course, most would not employ the intellectualized language of theology to make their case. Rather, they simply sense that no one faith tradition – not even Roman Catholicism – can claim a monopoly on God’s boundless presence in the world and throughout human experience and history.


A Pilgrimage of Discovery

Ultimately, of course, awareness of God in our lives and in the world, cannot be taught, it can only be evoked or awakened in the mind. That’s why I’ve come to believe that the language of theology is closer to metaphor and poetry than it is to doctrine and dogma.

So, employing the metaphorical and poetic language of theology, I like to suggest that together as the Mystical Body of Christ we are on a pilgrimage of discovery. We are continually discovering new aspects and dimensions of what it means to be fully human, and thus new depths of “the Truth.”

I’m not an absolutist. I don’t need to know that “my Church” has all the answers to every possible question, right at this moment in time. To claim that it does smacks of hubris – or, in the terminology of some, “religious imperialism.”

I don’t subscribe to a model of revelation that sees truths handed down from on high — complete and unchangeable. For as Pope John XXIII reminded us, “We are not on Earth to guard a museum but to cultivate a flowering garden of life.”

Such a statement implies that revelation filters upwards through human life and experience, that revelation is ongoing. It’s a concept that is both wondrous and unsettling. Yet for those who need absolute answers for absolutely everything, it’s a concept that is extremely threatening.

Embracing the reality of ongoing revelation propels us out of our comfortable ghettos of formulated answers and into compassionate, and at times challenging, engagement with the world. The Catholic tradition tells us that it is through such engagement that we are called to discern and incarnate the reign of God in every aspect of life.

In closing, I offer the words of Catholic theologian Leonardo Boff who, in an article titled “The Forsaken Ones,” notes the following:

Surely when the Latin American bishops in Aparecida, Brazil, had to deal with the central issue of the mission of the Church, they must have faced the still unresolved historical question arising from the treatment afforded the native peoples of these lands, and the Afro descendants. Christianity in general was always sensitive to the poor, but implacable and ethnocentric when it came to cultural otherness. The other (the Indigenous and the Black) was considered an enemy, pagan and infidel. “Just wars” were waged against them and they were read The Requirement (a document written in Latin, recognizing the king as sovereign and the Pope as the representative of God), and if the document was not accepted, forced submission was legitimized. We must never forget that our society is based on great violence: on colonialism . . .

This is why we were astonished when we quite recently heard that the first evangelization was “neither an imposition nor an alienation” and that trying to rehabilitate the religions of our ancestors would be “a backward movement and a regression”. Confronted with this, we cannot but hear the voice of the victims echoing into the present, witnesses of the other side of the conquest, such as the voice of the Mayan prophet, Chilam Balam de Chumayel: “Oh!, let us grieve because they arrived... They came to make our flowers whither away, so that only their flower may live... They came to castrate the sun.” And their lamentation continues: “Sadness was introduced among us, Christianity... That was the beginning of our misery, the beginning of our slavery.”

According to Oswald Spengler in The Decline of the West, the Iberian invasion was the greatest genocide in human history. Destruction amounted to around 90% of the population. Of the 22 million Aztecs in 1519, when Hernán Cortés entered Mexico, by only one million was left by 1600. And the survivors, as expressed by the theologian Jon Sobrino, are crucified peoples hanging from the cross. The mission of the Church is to take them down from that cross, and bring them back to life . . .

The mission of the Church is one of justice, not charity: to reinforce the rescue of ancient cultures with their soul that is their religion, and after that, to establish a dialogue in which both parties’ complements, purifies and mutually evangelizes one other.

__________________________________


* In light of all that I’m sharing, I guess you could say I embrace a Spirit Christology, rather than the traditional Logos Christology.

I’m certainly not claiming to have come up with this “Spirit Christology.” Indeed, it’s been present, in one form or another, both within and beyond Catholicism for centuries. Some maintain that it is the earliest form of Christology.

One contemporary Catholic theologian to have explored and articulated such a Christology is Jesuit theologian Roger Haight. His book, Jesus: Symbol of God (Obis, 1999), has been described as a “work of vast erudition” and a “thorough discussion” of post-modern Christology. Accordingly, it’s a work of scholarship that willingly explores beyond the parameters set by the current edition of that “Big Book of Doctrine” school of theology.

Not surprisingly, Haight’s work unsettles the gatekeepers of orthodoxy (see here and here). But then, that’s what good theologians should be prepared to do. They shouldn’t serve as mere stenographers for the Vatican.



See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
A Catholic’s Prayer for His Fellow Pilgrim, Benedict XVI
John Allen on the Censuring of Jon Sobrino
Authentic Catholicism: The Antidote to Clericalism
Beyond a PC Pope
Thoughts on Authority and Fidelity
A Dangerous Medieval Conviction
Charles Curran: Loyal Dissenter
Casanova-inspired Reflections on Papal Power – at 30,000 Ft.
The Onward Call