Sunday, October 18, 2026

Understanding What’s Going On in France


Following are two commentaries that I find helpful in understanding what’s currently happening in France and other countries in Europe. The first of these is written by photojournalist Guy Smallman who is on the ground in Paris.

Saturday, October 17th saw the biggest student uprising in France since the defeat of Sarkozy’s CPE legislation in the mid 2000s. An estimated 800,000 protested across the country. Saturday was billed as the mother of all protests as the movement of secondary school students was to be joined by the famous “Yellow Vests” . . . a loose knit movement of largely working-class protestors who brought France to a standstill eight years ago when demos against fuel hikes became a decentralised direct-action movement against inequality. They caused massive economic damage to the French state and regularly fought the cops off the streets. They were largely unconnected to the organized French left and trade unions. Their unruly campaign achieved a lot of its objectives causing Macron to scrap a raft of neoliberal proposals.

Yesterday they had little or no presence on the protest in Paris but there were plenty of the trademark high-vis garments on display. Being worn by their children. The state has thrown everything at the secondary school students who have imposed militant blockades of their schools over the appalling state of education. The repression has achieved little other than making the protests more militant. Students have been blinded and mutilated by the cops rubber bullets and stun grenades. Over 6,000 (majority of whom are under 18) have been arrested, yet still they march and disrupt.

It is also very clear that these mobilisations are about much more than just the state of secondary education.

These protests are militantly antifascist. There is a very genuine fear that after 8 years of neoliberal misery, inflicted on the French people by Macron’s technocratic failures, the door is now open for fascist Le Pen at next year’s Presidential elections. For the youth of France this thought is utterly abhorrent.

They fully understand the real causes of their pain and their anti-racist instincts have been cemented by the behavior of the cops towards students of colour. Particularly in the poorer suburbs of the cities, like the banlieues of Paris. Many of them chant the chorus of antifascist anthem “Porcherie” by ’90s punk band Beruier Noir. A song written over a decade before most of them were born.

The other issue that dominates is Palestine. Generation Z care little for the billionaire owned outlets of the mainstream media. Their news comes from sources like Instagram where the ongoing livestreamed genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing of the West Bank has become a focus for the injustice they see everywhere coming from the “Epstein class.” Racism against French Muslims, particularly Algerians, has also played its part.

[. . .] It was clear that the incredible numbers seen in Paris and across France had brought the youth to a place where they had lost their fear and decided it was payback time for weeks of police brutality and a rotten system that is robbing them of their future. They fully understand how the broken economic model they endure is hurtling them towards a fascist dystopia full of social, economic and environmental ruin. Why the fuck should anyone be expected to behave themselves in such circumstances?

– Guy Smallman
via social media
October 17, 2026


The following photographs were taken on the streets of Paris yesterday (October 17, 2026) by Guy Smallman.


Here’s the second piece I’m sharing today. It’s written by Carmen Eckard who posted it earlier today on Facebook.

Something enormous is happening in France right now, and I don’t think Americans are paying nearly enough attention.

Yesterday, somewhere between 550,000 and 800,000 people took to the streets across France. Not for a concert. Not for a celebration. They’re furious about the cost of living, the condition of their schools, and a government they believe has stopped listening to ordinary people.

And here’s the part I find especially interesting. This whole movement started with high school students.

For weeks, French teenagers have been protesting overcrowded classrooms, crumbling school buildings, teacher shortages, and education cuts. They’ve blockaded schools and demanded better conditions. And instead of quietly going back to class, they’ve managed to ignite something much bigger.

Workers joined them. Labor unions joined them. And then members of France’s famous Yellow Vest movement, the people who brought the country to a standstill over fuel prices and economic inequality back in 2018, started showing up too.

Now you’ve got teenagers standing alongside people who are worried about putting food on the table, paying their electric bills, and surviving on their wages or pensions. Different generations, different problems, but a whole lot of shared frustration.

And yesterday it exploded.

There were demonstrations in roughly 110 locations across the country. In Paris, police used tear gas and water cannons as clashes broke out. Shops were looted. Cars burned. In Limoges, a historic city hall was set on fire. There was serious destruction in several other cities, too.

I want to be clear about something. Hundreds of thousands of people marched peacefully. The people setting buildings on fire and looting businesses were not representative of everyone who came out to protest. You can support the right to protest and still recognize that destroying public buildings and terrorizing people isn’t helping anybody.

But I also think it would be a mistake to let the images of burning cars become the entire story.

Because the story is that hundreds of thousands of people have reached a point where they believe their government isn’t responding to their needs. And it began with kids asking for decent schools.

Think about that for a minute.

Teenagers complained about the conditions in their classrooms, and their frustration connected with something that was already simmering throughout the country. Parents were frustrated. Workers were frustrated. Retirees were frustrated. And suddenly all those separate complaints became one enormous national movement. France’s government says approximately 550,000 people participated. Organizers say 800,000. Either way, that’s an extraordinary number of people.

President Emmanuel Macron has condemned the violence, and the government has promised to prosecute those responsible for the destruction. That’s understandable. But the bigger political problem isn’t going to disappear when the streets are cleaned up.

People still have to buy groceries. They still have to pay their bills. And those students still have to go back into the same classrooms that started all of this. I’ve always found it fascinating how often young people are the ones who finally force a society to confront problems adults have spent years tolerating.

And there’s something worth thinking about here in America, too. Not because our circumstances are identical to France’s, but because frustration over education, wages, inequality, and the cost of simply existing certainly isn’t unique to the French.

It’s remarkable how many enormous political movements begin with ordinary people asking for things that really shouldn’t be extraordinary.

A decent education. A livable wage. Affordable necessities. A government that listens.

France is showing us what can happen when enough people decide they’ve had enough. Whether its leaders respond to the underlying problems, or simply to the unrest, is going to matter a great deal.

– Carmen Eckard
via social media
October 17, 2026



Related Off-site Links:
French High School Students Lead Mass Protests Over School Funding, Inequality; Thousands Arrested – Democracy Now! (October 6, 2026).
“Savagery”: Horrific Injuries as French Police Crack Down on Nationwide Student Protests – Brett Wilkins (Common Dreams (October 6, 2026).
“This Is Going Global”: Anti-Austerity Protests Spread From Spain and France to Chile, Belgium, and Beyond – Julia Conley (Common Dreams (October 8, 2026).
Tens of Thousands March in Solidarity with Students in France – Democracy Now! (October 14, 2026).
“The Government is Trembling”: Protests Erupt in France, Spreading to 140 Cities – Brad Reed (Common Dreams (October 17, 2026).


No Kings 4.0



Yesterday I participated in one of “No Kings”/“Get Out and Vote Early” rallies that took place across the country. As I’ve done previously, I attended the rally held outside Carondelet Village in St. Paul, MN. Many CSJ Sisters, fellow Consociates, and friends were at this particular gathering.

This was the fourth “No Kings” protest organized by the Democratic Party-aligned Indivisible coalition. This alignment is important to acknowledge as it effectively defangs any actual protest aspect of the “No Kings” movement, as many have noted.

Take, for example, the following from an anonymous online commentator:

One general strike in one city is worth more than every “No Kings” protest ever collectively. That’s because the “No Kings” protests are a sham designed to funnel people from the red capitalist party to the blue capitalist party. They lack class perspective and do not challenge the real kings who are the billionaires that own, control, and fund both parties.


Then there’s Keira Havens’ excellent October 15 article over at Current Affairs. Following is an excerpt.

On March 28, 2026 – two months after Trump’s gestapo forces murdered Alex Pretti and Renée Good – nearly 9 million people took to the streets to declare “No Kings” for the third time. The progressive organization behind the protest, Indivisible, declared it the largest single-day demonstration in American history.

But six months later, with November midterms fast approaching, ICE continues to kidnap immigrants from their homes and Trump is not an inch closer to being convicted and removed from office. A fourth No Kings event is just days away and some organizers have begun to question what exactly the group is demanding.

Indivisible was founded in the wake of Trump’s first election by husband and wife Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg, both former congressional staffers. In December 2016, alongside a group of colleagues, the couple published a 26-page digital guide to resistance on Google Docs (the Indivisible Guide). The handbook quickly went viral and thousands of local Indivisible chapters began to spring up across the country, demanding Trump’s impeachment and removal from office. Democratic leadership was not amused, citing the need to stay focused on policy rather than accountability. Nancy Pelosi said the party should cultivate the image of being the “‘no drama’ Democrats.”

Ten years later, the Democrats are still reluctant to impeach Donald Trump and hold him accountable for his crimes and unconstitutional actions. Indivisible, known for its most-prominent visual, a logo of a crossed-out crown above the words “NO KINGS,” seems to have joined them in this.

Despite its origins as a movement dedicated to helping citizens pressure elected officials into resisting the Trump agenda, Indivisible National has not endorsed Trump's impeachment, telling a local chapter via email that it is “not an endorsed priority” for the No Kings! Coalition. In Montana, the organization went further, requesting that the same chapter not use the “No Kings!” logo or branding for their impeachment-focused event—and threatening to remove them from statewide communications after they didn't comply. That dispute followed another undemocratic intervention in the state's politics: a campaign by Indivisible National to convince Alani Bankhead, the Montana Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, to withdraw from the race. (Levin and Greenberg did not respond to Current Affairs’ request for comment, or an interview.) These incidents raise questions about the direction of one of the country’s largest anti-Trump organizing networks. Is the country’s leading resistance group still focused on “resistance,” or has its strategy become increasingly concerned with preserving the Democratic Party's electoral prospects?

[. . .] As Indivisible has gained resources and membership, they appear to have transformed from an agent of effective change to a part of the establishment. The Democratic establishment routinely chooses “safe” candidates over unabashedly progressive ones. In this cycle, those candidates have lost. Repeatedly. In multiple states. Again and again.

[. . .] In the six months since No Kings 3, the leaders of the national Indivisible organization have subverted democratic outcomes and diverted the righteous anger of the American people away from Congress. In doing so, they are signaling that they are comfortable allowing this autocratic regime to remain in power. The establishment they support says it outright, with House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries stating that impeachment is not a priority and Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) saying that she wants to “move on” and help Trump “save face.”

They are out of touch. The American people want accountability. Fifty-five percent of Americans, to include 80-plus percent of Democrats and 60-plus percent of independents, support impeachment. In fact, a majority of Americans have wanted impeachment since April of 2025.

Congress refuses to listen, and Indivisible seems content to let Congress pat constituents on the head and tell them to let the adults handle this. Our leaders are not leading, and so citizens must pave the way.

– Keira Havens
Excerpted from “No Kings.
No Demands. What Happened?
”
Current Affairs
October 15, 2026


I agree with everything said above. And I’ve also made a point of attending every “No Kings” rally – usually with a two-sided sign that invites people to consider dumping the duopoly and voting Green. In doing so, I hopefully made people think about options beyond the liberal talking points – options that, in the words of Fights Back! founder Chase Linko-Looper, are “bold enough to touch the systems that crown kings in the first place.”


Yesterday, I carried a sign that read: “I Stand 4 Love,” and in my mind (and heart) I was expressing and advocating for the “politics of love” that author and former Democratic presidential candidate Marianne Williamson talks about.

Here’s what Christopher Schoenherr writes about Williamson’s “politics of love”:

In Williamson’s work, love is not an emotion. It is a way of seeing. A way of organizing society. A way of deciding what matters. A way of deciding who matters. And ultimately, a way of deciding what civilization is for.

When Williamson talks about love, she is not talking about being nice. She is not talking about avoiding conflict. She is not talking about positive thinking. She is not talking about pretending evil does not exist. In fact, one of the most striking things about her work is how directly she confronts suffering. She writes about poverty, war, racism, corruption, child neglect, environmental destruction, corporate greed, democratic decline.

The politics of love is not an escape from reality. It is an attempt to look at reality more honestly.

What she is really asking is a deceptively simple question: What would society look like if human flourishing were the goal? Not profit. Not power. Not partisan victory. Not endless economic growth for its own sake. Human flourishing.

The question sounds almost embarrassingly obvious. Yet once you start asking it, everything changes.

– Christopher Schoenherr
From “Marianne Williamson’s Politics of Love
Has Nothing to Do With Feelings
”
Earth Drama
June 14, 2026


Related Off-site Links:
“No Kings” Draws Crowds with Focus on Early Voting – Ava Berger (NPR News, October 17, 2026).
Hundreds Gather in Downtown Minneapolis for “No Kings” Early Voting Day of Action – Maya Betti and Alyssa Chen (Minnesota Reformer, October 17, 2026).


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
• “Performative Resistance Alone Won’t Change Anything”
• Carlos LeMar Dixon: Without Revolutionary Action, We’re Just “Entertaining the Kings”
• “Protesting Is What Patriotism Looks Like in Public”: The “No Kings” Protests of June 14, 2025
• Thoughts on the Eve of “No Kings Day” 2.0
• “We Intend to Defend Our Democracy”: The “No Kings” Protests of Oct. 18, 2025
• Authoritarianism With a Blue Sticker
• “No Kings”? Absolutely. But Also “No Oligarchy”
• Bruce Fanger on Jesus’s Theology of No Kings
• Norman Solomon: Quote of the Day – June 16, 2025
• Butch Ware: “We Have the Power to Stop the Flow of Money and the False Legitimacy Upon Which Empire Depends”
Chris Hedges: “Most Revolutions Succeed Not Through Violence But Through National Strikes”
• Marianne Williamson: “We Must Challenge the Entire System”
• “Organized Sustained Systemic Resistance and Self-Defense Are Our Only Options”
• No Kings 3.0 – March 28, 2026
• Caitlin Johnstone on the “No Kings” Protests

See also:
• Christopher Schoenherr on Marianne Williamson’s Politics of Love
• Christopher Schoenherr on Why America Couldn’t Hear Marianne Williamson
• Marianne Williamson and the Power of Politicized Love • Marianne Williamson’s “Radical Idea” of Putting People First
• Marianne Williamson: “We Need to Disrupt the Corrupt”
• Marianne Williamson: Playing It Big
• Marianne Williamson: We Need an “Expanded Version of What it Means to Be Political”
• Marianne Williamson on the Need for “Radical Love” in Responding to Trump’s Dismantling of Democracy


Saturday, October 17, 2026

Kiki and Carmelo – Under the Night Sky

Something very special this evening for “music night” at The Wild Reed. . . . It’s “Under the Night Sky,” a 2007 concert featuring English singer Kiki Dee and her long-time musical collaborator, guitar virtuoso Carmelo Luggeri.

The “classy duo”’s near two-hour set includes reworked versions of Kiki’s classic 1970’s hits “Don’t Go Breaking My Heart,” “Amoureuse,” and “I’ve Got the Music in Me,” as well as acoustic covers of Kate Bush’s “Running Up That Hill” and Tom Petty’s “Learning to Fly.”

Recorded at the historic Bray Film Studios, the performance also features Claire Finnimore on viola and Annabel Lamb on backing vocals. . . Enjoy!





For more of Kiki Dee at The Wild Reed, see:
• Kiki Dee and Carmelo Luggeri
• “A Classy Duo”
• Music Legend Kiki Dee: “I’m a Down-to-Earth Person”
• Classic Kiki
• Celebrating Kiki
• Deeper Understandings
• Celebrating the Proverbial “Soulman”
• The End Is Not the End
• Amoureuse
• A Classic Duet Turns 50
• Elton and Kiki: Together Again
• Honoring the Darkness While Remembering the Light
• The Light of This New Year’s Day

Related Off-site Link:
Kiki Dee and Carmelo Luggeri’s Official Website
Kiki Dee’s Forward Motion – The Strange Brew (August 2023).


A Spirited Exchange on Voting

Earlier this month I posted the following on Facebook, noting that “Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine recently shared that he did not vote for Kamala Harris in 2024, and liberals within the Democratic Party are having a meltdown.”


I also shared this related quote by my friend Adam.

If you’re surprised that Tom Morello didn’t vote for Kamala-freakin’-Harris then you’re in the exact same category as people who thought [Bruce Springsteen’s] “Born in the USA” was a patriotic song. What evidence has Morello EVER given you to think he votes for genocide?


A liberal friend of mine, Rebecca, responded . . .

I deeply respect you, Michael Bayly and I struggle with this. Elections are never liberation. They are about harm reduction. I am someone who has done a fair amount of work against the genocide in Palestine. I care deeply about it. And I care about access to reproductive health care and queer and trans people and immigrants and climate justice and . . . By voting for a third party candidate or not voting, the white Christian nationalist movement was able to take control of all three branches of government and cause a lot of damage and authortarian take over.


I responded with the following:

Rebecca, I deeply respect you too and all the incredible work you do in relation to so many justice and peace issues. I just want to note that there’s something you said in your comment that is not supported by the data. It’s the claim that voting for a third party candidate enabled “the white Christian nationalist movement to take control of all three branches of government” in 2024. In actuality, if every left-leaning third party vote was given to Kamala Harris, she still would have lost to Trump. I really think the blaming and shaming energy directed to third party voters is both misdirected and misguided. Our criticism should, first and foremost, be directed to candidates like Harris who very intentionally chose not to do what we all knew needed to be done re. Gaza so as to earn the necessary number of votes to defeat Trump. The Democratic establishment goes to great lengths to smear third party candidates and voters rather than take responsibility for their own bad decisions and failures. I believe this is one reason for why the party is at its all-time lowest approval rating.


In support of what I said, I shared this graphic:


Another friend, Christopher, chimed in . . .

Throwing away a vote has never led to less genocide.


To which I said:

Christopher, nor has voting for the corporatist/oligarchic duolopy. . . . Also, what might be considered a “wasted vote” for one person, could for another be a vote of profound meaning and conscience. . . . I think expending time and energy blaming and shaming voters is what's actually a complete waste. Wouldn’t it be better to use that energy to shift candidates’ policies and positions so that they actually earn the votes needed to defeat their opponents?


Christopher responded with the following:

Yes, it is appropriate to use energy to shift policies and positions. I’ve been doing it professionally for most of my adult life. But little things like Medicare, Medicaid, the right for gays to marry, health insurance for children, and more came from supporting the candidate that was marginally better on the ballot rather than naively pretending someone on Putin’s payroll would be unicorn to fix America’s problems.


In response I said:

Christopher, the incremental changes you cite re. healthcare still leave millions uninsured or underinsured. It’s not surprising then that polls show that Americans’ faith in both corporatist parties is at an all-time low. More and more people are recognizing that an incremental approach that ameliorates people’s suffering at the hands of a profoundly dysfunctional and unjust political and economic system needs to be replaced by a bold and radical approach that transforms this system so that this suffering is eradicated, not managed. There are people, movements, and parties dedicated to such a transformative approach but they are intentionally (and undemocratically) shut out of the current political arrangement by both corporatist/oligarchic parties. All manner of propaganda is also hurled their way, as you demonstrate with your reference to “someone on Putin’s payroll.” The incremental / “lesser evil” / “harm reduction” approach has brought us to where we are today. Moreover it has moved the Overton window ever rightwards so that the Democratic Party is now firmly a center right party and the Republican Party has gone full-on fascist. I've come to the conclusion that a progressive third party is no longer an option but an imperative. For quite some time now it is toward the building of such a party that I am compelled to expend my time, energy and money. That doesn't mean I haven't supported progressive Democratic candidates; I have – Bernie, Marianne Williamson, Nina Turner, Omar Fateh, Zohran Mamdani, Abdul El-Sayed and others. But in practically every case the campaigns of these candidates have been sabotaged by the DNC. The sad reality is that for every Mamdani there are 500 corporatist Democrats and thus practically no chance of the much-needed transformative change ever being realized. Of course, there are some who say that it’s a “privileged” position to strive for transformative change rather than stick with the incremental approach. I’d argue the opposite. The privileged position is held by those who have the resources to endure the long drawn-out time frame of the incremental approach as opposed to the many others who need immediate transformative change to simply survive, let alone thrive. Again, neither corporatist/oligarchic party is willing to advocate, let alone legislate such transformative change. . . . It’s time to dump the duopoly.


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:

THE STATE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
• Oliver Kornetzke’s Epic Takedown of the Liberal Tactic of Blaming and Shaming Leftists
• The Time for Illusions Is Over: Henry Giroux on the Democratic Party
• Ashley Stevens: Quote of the Day – August 18, 2026
• “Our Country Right Now Is At a Crossroads”
• Abdul El-Sayed: The Disruptor Michigan (and the Country) Needs
• Scotty T. Reid on James Clyburn as a “Defender of the Political Establishment and Its Policies of Oppression”
• Mike Figueredo on the “Political Malpractice” of the Democratic Party
• David Norton: “The Democratic Party Serves Capital, Not You”
• Mike Figueredo: “Elected Democrats Have No Real Interest in Doing What the Base Wants”
• Ted Rall: Democrats Are Not “the Left”
• Exposing the Dark Money Network Secretly Funding Establishment Democratic Influencers
• Why the Democratic Party Is Not Going to Save Us From Fascism
• Howie Hawkins: “The Democrats Are Not the Answer to the Trump/Fascism Problem”
• Adam Bates on the Team Blue / Kamala “I Told Ya So” Smugness Tour
• When the “Blue Wave” Is a “Blue Crackdown”
• The Longstanding Fault Lines Within the Democratic Party Have Surfaced Again in Minnesota
• Jeff Cohen on How Obama’s “Corporate Liberalism” Led to the Rise of Trump
• Progressive Perspectives on Bernie Sanders’ “Fighting Oligarchy” Tour
• Eric Fernández: Quote of the Day – May 14, 2025
• Marianne Williamson: Quote of the Day – July 26, 2025
• Democrat Talk on the Eve of Trump’s Return
• When Democrats Undermine Democracy
• A Deeper Perspective on What’s Really Attacking American Democracy
• “We Must Challenge the Entire System”
• Marianne Williamson: “‘Vote Blue No Matter Who’ Is Not Enough to Win”
• Nick Cruse: “‘Vote Blue No Matter Who’ Is the Privileged Position”
• Will Democrats Never Learn?
• Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t


THE RISE OF FASCISM IN THE U.S.
• George Conway: The Trump Administration Is a “Criminal Organization”
• Mark Greene on How ICE Is a Weapon of the Epstein Class
• Tommy J. Housman on Reactions to the “Defining Image” of Trump’s America
• James Greenberg: “I Am in Mourning for America”
• An Incident That Feels “Ripped from a Dystopian Novel”
• The “Creeping Fascism of Trump’s America”: A View from Australia
• Will Potter on Trump’s War on Dissent: “This Is What Fascists Do”
• Derek Johnson on the “Courage to Call Fascism by Its Name”
• Jason Duchin: Quote of the Day – September 24, 2025
• Staying Strong in Trump’s Fascist America
• James Greenberg on the Identity Politics of MAGA
• “This Is What Fascism Looks Like in Practice”
• Garrett Graff: “America Tips Into Fascism”
• Marianne Williamson: “We’re Moving Into Totalitarianism”
• “It’s Here, and We Are Sleepwalking Through It”
• Khalil Gibran Muhammad on Donald Trump’s Militarization of Law Enforcement
• Marianne Williamson: Quote of the Day – June 20, 2025


THE GREEN PARTY
• Butch Ware on Why Third Parties Are Crucial
• Campaigning With the Green Party
• With the Green Party at Twin Cities Pride
• Meet Some of the “People-Powered” Green Party Candidates for 2026
• “Green Wave 2026 is Global”
• MPR’s Major (But Unsurprising) Failure
• “It Is Our Responsibility to Make a Third Party Viable”
• Something to Think About – December 8, 2024
• The Green Party’s Jill Stein and Butch Ware Give Their First Post-Election Interview
• “We Give Reasons for People to Come Out and Vote”
• We’re Witnessing a Liberal Meltdown Over Jill Stein
• The “Green Smoothie” Option
• Green Party Vice Presidential Candidate Butch Ware in Minneapolis
• Butch Ware: “I’m Not Here as a Spoiler”
• Jill Stein: “Americans Deserve Choices”
• Elise Labott on How Third Parties Can Revitalize Democracy
• Third Parties and the Historical Record
• Something to Think About – August 15, 2024
• Howie Hawkins: “The Democrats Are Not the Answer to the Trump/Fascism Problem”
• Demolishing the False Narrative About Jill Stein and the 2016 Election
• Cornel West: “The Next Step Is a Green Step, a Progressive Step”
• Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein: Is a “Historic Collaboration” in the Making? (2016)
• Voting Green: Hope Over Fear


Friday, October 16, 2026

Standing Together in Minnesota

I’ll be at work during the following times (though I may take the 23rd off for my birthday!). But just let me say that it is community-focused initiatives like this that make me proud to be a Minnesotan.


UPDATE: Here are some photos from this afternoon's gatherings of support outside of mosques in the Twin Cities. They were posted online this evening by ISAIAH.


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
• This Is the Moment We “Start Fighting Like Hell”
• Brenna Zeimet: Quote of the Day – October 9, 2026
• On July 4th, Two Very Different Marches
• “The Fascist Fist Is Tightening Because It Knows That It Is Losing Its Grasp on Us”
• Greg Ketter: A Valiant Minnesotan
• The “Power, Peril and Importance” of What’s Happening in Minnesota
• Quote of the Day – February 23, 2026
• The North Remembers
• Dispatches from Occupied Minnesota
• More Dispatches from Occupied Minnesota
• A Luminous Celebration of Light, Love and Community
• Honoring Renée Good and the “Astonishing Surge of Courage” of Minneapolis
• Bruce Springsteen and the Streets of Minneapolis in the Winter of ’26
• Adam Serwer on How “Every Social Theory Undergirding Trumpism Has Been Broken on the Steel of Minnesotan Resolve”
• Honoring Alex Pretti
• “ICE Out!”: The Minnesota General Strike – 1/23/26
• Why Minnesota?
• Doing What We Can to Stop Unjust Arrests of Immigrants
• Photo of the Day – December 5, 2025
• Omar Fateh: Quote of the Day – December 4, 2025
• Demanding Justice and Embodying Compassion for Separated Families (2019)
• “What We’re Seeing Here Is a Tipping Point” (2018)
• “It Is All Connected” (2017)
• 2000+ Take to the Streets of Minneapolis to Express Solidarity with Immigrants and Refugees (2017)
• Fasting, Praying, and Walking for Immigration Reform (2007)
• May Day 2007

Related Off-site Link:
• Minnesota Neighbors Film Project (2026)


Thursday, October 15, 2026

This Is the Moment We “Start Fighting Like Hell”


Writes Julia Conley:

“I have rarely wanted to be wrong more,” said one journalist Wednesday night after The Wall Street Journal confirmed what many supporters of U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar had suspected: that the Department of Homeland Security’s raid on her home this week was part of an investigation that is ultimately aimed at deporting her.

The Journal reported that U.S. officials confirmed the Trump administration aims to revoke Omar’s (D-Minn.) citizenship, which she obtained in 2000, five years after she arrived in the U.S. with her family from a refugee camp in Kenya. Omar is originally from Somalia, and President Donald Trump has made Somali Americans a key target of his mass deportation agenda and his racist attacks on immigrant communities.

Agents with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), part of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), seized Omar’s passport, cellphone, personal computers, and notebooks, according to The Wall Street Journal, when they searched her home in Washington, DC.

Authorities have also issued more than a dozen subpoenas and are seeking testimony from people including Omar’s family members before a grand jury.

A Justice Department official told the WSJ that the agency plans to build its case on allegations that Omar lied about her age when she became a citizen.

Federal investigators have been examining whether Omar’s father, who died in 2020, altered her age to say she was 17 instead of 18 on immigration paperwork when he applied for citizenship. Doing so would have allowed Omar to acquire citizenship through her father.

The congresswoman, who is currently running for a fifth term, has previously denied committing immigration fraud, which Vice President JD Vance has openly accused her of. Other Republican elected officials have explicitly attacked Omar for her criticism of Israel and for being a Muslim, with Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) calling her a “terrorist.”

Trump has suggested the progressive lawmaker should be deported for “always complaining” and has called to “denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility.”

Journalist Peter Sterne said Wednesday evening that “many on the left suspected” the administration was attempting to deport Omar, “but it’s still wild to see the WSJ confirm it.”

Dylan Williams of the Center for International Policy emphasized that the raid and investigation – carried out just weeks before the midterm elections and as Americans are already voting, though the Justice Department typically does not take actions against candidates just before an election – are “an attempt by the Trump administration to stir up its flagging base ahead of elections that are going to be brutal for them.”

“Nonetheless, we need to fight this fascist, un-American abuse of power, hold those responsible accountable, and stand with Ilhan Omar,” said Williams.

[. . .] New York state Assembly Member Diana Moreno (D-36) said of the WSJ’s reporting, “This is either the breaking point of our democracy or the moment we start fighting like hell to win back this country from the authoritarian demons in the White House. I stand with Ilhan Omar.”

– Julia Conley
Excerpted from “Omar Raid and Investigation Aimed at
Deporting Congresswoman, Officials Say
”
Common Dreams
October 15, 2026


Related Off-site Links:
Ilhan Omar’s Home Raided by DHS Following Trump Deportation Threats – Stephen Prager (Common Dreams, October 12, 2026).
Ilhan Omar’s Office Slams Trump Deportation Plot as “Authoritarian Move to Silence an Opponent” – Brad Reed (Common Dreams, October 15, 2026).
What’s at Stake in the Ilhan Omar Case – John Ganz (Dissent, October 15, 2026).
“Bogus”: Minnesota State Senator Zaynab Mohamed on DHS Raid on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s D.C. Home – Democracy Now! (October 14, 2026).
“Part of the Fascist Playbook”: Ilhan Omar Condemns Trump DHS Raid on Her Home – Jake Johnson (Common Dreams, October 13, 2026).
Marjorie Taylor Greene Comes To Nemesis Ilhan Omar’s Defense, Calls Trump Administration’s Investigation “Bullshit” – Michael Luciano (Mediate, October 14, 2026).
Democrats Rebuke Federal Raid of Ilhan Omar’s Home: “Rogue Abuse of Power” – Maya Yang (The Guardian, October 12, 2026).
Trump Says Lawmakers Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib Should Be Removed From U.S. – Erin Hale (Al Jazeera, February 26, 2026).
In State of the Union, Trump Slams Somalis Over Fraud; Rep. Ilhan Omar Shouts Back – Sydney Kashiwagi (The Minnesota Star Tribune, February 25, 2026).
Ilhan Omar: “You Know Damn Well I Was Going to Respond to” Trump’s State of the Union “Lie” About Somalis – Eric Garcia (Independent, February 25, 2026).
“You Have Killed Americans,” “Black People Aren’t Apes”: Democrats Ilhan Omar and Al Green Protest Trump’s State of the Union – Democracy Now! (February 25, 2026).
Al Green and Ilhan Omar Interrupt Trump’s State of the Union Speech As Democrats Rally Outside Capitol – Rising (February 25, 2026).
From Minneapolis to Somalia: Here’s Everything Trump Gets Wrong About Somalis – Jordan Liz (Common Dreams, February 22, 2026).

UPDATES: Trump Officials Scrutinized Omar in 2019. They Didn’t Find Citizenship Issues – Ted Hesson, Jeremy Roebuck, Perry Stein and Salvador Rizzo (The Washington Post via Yahoo! News, October 16, 2026).
Ilhan Omar’s Attorneys Say Federal Search of Her Home Was “Neither Justified Nor Lawful” – Eric Berger (The Guardian, October 17, 2026).


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:

ILHAN OMAR
• For Rep. Ilhan Omar, Silence Is Never an Option
• Rep. Ilhan Omar: “These Findings Are Shocking, But Sadly, Not Surprising”
• Dean Phillips: Quote of the Day – February 3, 2023
• Ilhan Omar: “The Coup Attempt on January 6th Was a Warning for What’s to Come If We Don’t Act”
• Ilhan Omar: Quote of the Day – October 28, 2021
• Hadas Thier: Quote of the Day – June 11, 2021
• Ilhan Omar: Quote of the Day – May 29, 2021
• Ilhan Omar: Quote of the Day – January 13, 2021
• Progressive Perspectives on the 2020 U.S. Election Results
• Rep. Ilhan Omar Responds to President Trump’s Authoritarian Threats
• Quote of the Day: Ilhan Omar – August 11, 2020
• Ricardo Levins Morales on the “Deepest Political Fault Line” Separating Democrats Ilhan Omar and Antone Melton-Meaux
• To Whom the Future of America Belongs
• Ilhan Omar: Stepping Into Her Power
• Ilhan Omar: Quote of the Day – April 13, 2019
• Progressive Perspectives on the Ilhan Omar “Controversy”
• Ilhan Omar on The Daily Show
• Juan Cole: Quote of the Day – February 11, 2019


THE RISE OF FASCISM IN THE U.S.
• Brenna Zeimet: Quote of the Day – September 24, 2025
• “Our Country Right Now Is At a Crossroads”
• George Conway: The Trump Administration Is a “Criminal Organization”
• Mark Greene on How ICE Is a Weapon of the Epstein Class
• Tommy J. Housman on Reactions to the “Defining Image” of Trump’s America
• James Greenberg: “I Am in Mourning for America”
• An Incident That Feels “Ripped from a Dystopian Novel”
• The “Creeping Fascism of Trump’s America”: A View from Australia
• Will Potter on Trump’s War on Dissent: “This Is What Fascists Do”
• Derek Johnson on the “Courage to Call Fascism by Its Name”
• Jason Duchin: Quote of the Day – September 24, 2025
• Staying Strong in Trump’s Fascist America
• James Greenberg on the Identity Politics of MAGA
• “This Is What Fascism Looks Like in Practice”
• Garrett Graff: “America Tips Into Fascism”
• Marianne Williamson: “We’re Moving Into Totalitarianism”
• “It’s Here, and We Are Sleepwalking Through It”
• Khalil Gibran Muhammad on Donald Trump’s Militarization of Law Enforcement
• Marianne Williamson: Quote of the Day – June 20, 2025


Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Andy Shallal Reflects on the “Paradigm-Shifting” Film, NAZA

Once in a while, a film comes that shifts the paradigm, offering a shattering new lens to a conflict that has been around as long as I have lived. As the genocide of Palestinians continues unabated, now stretching into a third year (though many would argue that it has been nearly eight decades), it is easy to succumb to helplessness. Yet, paradoxically, I have never been more hopeful.

The tide is turning. You can feel it. You can hear it. You can see it. Like a tsunami rumbling deep beneath the ocean floor, the rumble is growing closer to the shore. We see it when an influencer’s commentary goes viral. You see it when a high-profile ally steps forward. And when congressional candidates shift the political discourse. Change is always far too slow, but what seemed entirely impossible yesterday suddenly feels inevitable.

You also see it with films like NAZA, a documentary by two Israeli directors. Shot in a dark film noir style, it features shadowy figures on a Tel Aviv rooftop delivering a message that most of us probably already knew. The interviewees are IDF intelligence personnel operating from military headquarters. Their mandate is simple: identify targets and pass them up the chain of command for execution.

What is most terrifying (and telling) about the film, however, is the subjects’ complete lack of remorse about their work. To them its a job. Their targets are digitally detached. They execute their orders from the comfort of an office building in Tel Aviv less than an hour's drive from Gaza.

It reminded me of the type of disconnect in The Zone of Interest, where Nazi commanders lived idyllic lives directly adjacent to the human ovens of Auschwitz. These Israelis mirror this type of existence. They casually discuss inventing AI programs to “track” and “eliminate” human targets. In their mechanical calculus, their algorithmic parameters allow for tens, if not hundreds, of deaths under the cold classification of NAZA, the Hebrew military term for “collateral damage”, with program names like “Where’s Daddy” and “Lavender.”

Over time, this eerily mechanized detachment has stripped them of their humanity. One interviewee even mentions studying clinical psychology during their off-hours. Tragically, these men and women do not represent a fringe, they reflect the mainstream of Israeli society today and the inescapable warning that the ultimate casualty is our shared humanity.

– Andy Shallal
via social media
October 13, 2026






Related Off-site Links:
Israeli Documentary NAZA Exposes “System of Killing” in Gaza From Eyes of Secret Intelligence Unit – Brett Wilkins (Common Dreams, September 10, 2026).
NAZA Film on Gaza Genocide Wins Venice Special Jury Prize; Israel Threatens Directors’ Citizenship – Democracy Now! (September 14, 2026).
NAZA Filmmakers to Make Film Available for Free Online Amid Israel’s Smear Campaign – Julia Conley (Common Dreams, September 24, 2026).
The Israeli Film Directors Pushing for a Reckoning in Their Home Country – The Daily (October 12, 2026).
Netanyahu Seeks to Identify and Prosecute IDF Soldiers in Investigative Documentary NAZA – Democracy Now! (October 13, 2026).

UPDATES: “Tough to Watch, Impossible to Ignore”: Reviewers on NAZA Documentary – Sammy Gecsoyler (The Guardian, October 16, 2026).
NAZA: The Film Shocking Israeli Society – Channel 4 News (October 16, 2026).
NAZA: The Film Israel Does Not Want You to See – Today in Focus (October 16, 2026).
Navi Pillay on the Legal Proof for Genocide in Gaza – Basement Films (October 16, 2026).
I’ve Debated with Israel’s Most Fervent Defenders – NAZA Debunks Their Talking Points – Mehdi Hasan (The Guardian, October 16, 2026).


See also the following chronologically-ordered Wild Reed posts:
• October 7, 2023: “Nothing About Today Is ‘Unprovoked’”
• Phyllis Bennis: “If We Are Serious About Ending This Spiraling Violence, We Need to Look at Root Causes”
• Voices of Reason and Compassion on the Crisis in Israel and Gaza
• More Voices of Reason and Compassion on the Crisis in Israel and Gaza
• Ta-Nehisi Coates: Quote of the Day – November 2, 2023
• Jehad Abusalim: Quote of the Day – December 8, 2023
• Christmas 2023 – Reflections, Activism, Art, and Celebrations
• Sabrina Salvati: Quote of the Day – January 2, 2024
• Michael Fakhri: Quote of the Day – February 27, 2024
• Phyllis Bennis: Quote of the Day – March 28, 2024
• Josh Paul: Quote of the Day – March 28, 2024
• “A Genocide Has Been Normalized”
• “This Is a Genocidal Project”
• Outrage and Despair
• Kyle Kulinski: Quote of the Day – May 23, 2024
• John Cusack: Quote of the Day – July 26, 2024
• Yousef Munayyer: Quote of the Day – August 30, 2024
• “It’s a Systematic Slaughter That We’re Funding”
• Protesting Weapons Manufacturer and Genocide Enabler General Dynamics
• Something to Think About – September 26, 2024
• “A Year of War Against Children”
• Anti-Genocide Presidential Candidate Jill Stein Reflects on the First Anniversary of Israel’s Genocide in Gaza
• “This Is a Tragic, Heartbreaking Moment in the History of Humanity”
• Hope and Courage – Christmas 2024
• Chris Hedges: “Israel Has No Intention of Halting Its Merry-Go-Round of Death”
• The Lamentable Legacy of the Biden Administration
• Caitlin Johnstone: Quote of the Day – January 22, 2025
• The Only Difference
• Silence on Gaza Genocide Is “More Than a Mere Moral Abdication; It Is Lethal”
• The Theft of One’s Soul: Omar El Akkad on the “Lesser of Two Evils” Argument
• How Genocide Becomes Ordinary
• “A Holocaust, Live-streamed”
• Why What’s Happening in Palestine – and Our Response to It – Is So Important
• Caitlin Johnstone: Quote of the Day – July 23, 2025
• Israel’s Actions in Gaza: “A Clear and Present Moral Collapse”
• Protesting Israel’s “Starvation Campaign” in Gaza
• A Call to Divest from Israel
• Idrees Ahmad: Quote of the Day – August 25, 2025
• A Poem That Remains Painfully Relevant
• Two Years of “Indescribable Horror”
• The Architecture of Settler Colonialism
• Kym Staton: Quote of the Day – March 3, 2026
• Omid Safi: Quote of the Day – March 7, 2026
• Chris Hedges: “The Genocide in Gaza Is the Beginning. Welcome to the New World Order”
• “The Moral Issue of Our Generation”
• Genevieve Fraser: Quote of the Day – August 26, 2026
• “One More Destruction of Our Collective Humanity”

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
• “The Mistreatment and Discrimination Against Palestinians Is Not Unprecedented. It’s Baked Into the Foundation of the Political System in Israel”
• “Essential Viewing for All Who Care to Understand the Plight of the People of Palestine”
• Progressive Perspectives on the Ongoing Israeli-Palestinian “Nightmare” (2021)
• Something to Think About – July 29, 2018
• Noura Erakat: Quote of the Day – May 15, 2018
• For Some Jews, Israel’s Treatment of Palestinians is Yet Another Jewish Tragedy
• Remembering the Six-Day War and Its Ongoing Aftermath
• David Norris: Quote of the Day – August 12, 2014