Friday, September 11, 2026

25 Years of the “Exact Wrong Response to 9/11”

In marking the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S., Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J.S. Davies have penned a powerful piece that explains why “25 years of war was the exact wrong response to 9/11.”

First published this past Wednesday, September 9 at Common Dreams, I share this important article today at The Wild Reed in its entirety.

________________

The lesson of 9/11 should be that war is not the answer to any of the problems facing the United States. After inflicting violence and chaos on country after country for twenty-five years in a “global war on terror” that has evolved into a Zionist genocide and a revived Cold War against Russia and China, the widespread public opposition to Trump’s war on Iran suggests that most Americans have finally learned that lesson.

Unfortunately, powerful sections of our corrupt business and political elites have not.

Most Americans old enough to remember September 11, 2001, can still recall the horrifying images played endlessly on our TV screens as the scale of the mass murder became clear. But we also remember something else: the sinking feeling that the hopes and dreams of billions of people, in the U.S. and around the world, would be pushed to the back-burner for the foreseeable future, as our leaders and corporate media all too predictably embraced a new agenda of revenge, fear-mongering, jingoism and military violence.

We found out later that only hours after the attacks — less than six hours after the first plane struck the World Trade Center and barely five hours after the Pentagon was hit – the planning for America’s military response to the 9/11 massacre was already under way.

At 2:40 pm, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld convened a meeting at the Pentagon. Notes taken by Undersecretary Stephen Cambone, later obtained by CBS News, recorded Rumsfeld demanding the “best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit S.H.” – meaning Saddam Hussein – “at the same time” as Osama bin Laden. Then came the chilling instruction: “Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not.”

Twenty-five years later, we can look back and see how the U.S. government used September 11 to unleash a crusade of violence, war crimes and chaos across the world. Experts like Nuremberg prosecutor Ben Ferencz and military historian Michael Howard warned from the beginning that declaring a “war on terror” made no sense and would make matters worse.

They were right, of course. But when the State Department’s annual Patterns of Global Terrorism report for 2004 showed an unprecedented increase in global terrorism following the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice simply cancelled and discontinued the report, replacing it with a new one with different criteria to prevent comparison with previous years.

But, as Rumsfeld made clear to his subordinates from the outset, the 9/11 crisis provided an open-ended pretext for endless wars against enemies who had nothing to do with the attacks, and for the re-militarization of the United States after the small reduction in its military spending after the end of the Cold War.

Total U.S. military spending for the past 25 years has exceeded $21 trillion (in 2024 dollars), surpassing the combined spending of the other 18 largest military powers in the world. During that time, China has built a whole new civilization and infrastructure, and leap-frogged the U.S. economy to become the world leader in clean energy, high-speed rail and technological sectors in which the US was once preeminent.

Both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for these counter-productive choices, and the appalling human costs of these wars on the countries the United States has attacked, bombed or invaded make this an especially atrocious way to squander our nation’s wealth.

The history of the United States during this period calls to mind an old Greek myth. Croesus, the famously wealthy king of Lydia, asked the Oracle at Delphi what would happen if he invaded Persia. The Oracle told him, “If you cross the Halys river, a great empire will fall.” Encouraged, Croesus launched the invasion. But he lost the war, and the empire that fell was his own.

In pursuing their global imperial ambitions, our leaders and ruling classes have discounted and betrayed the real sources of America’s prosperity and security: the well-being of the American people and peaceful relations with our neighbors around the world.

They have led us into war, poverty and extreme inequality, and hollowed out a system of government that was slowly becoming more democratic. At home, decades of political struggle by labor, civil rights and other social movements produced enormous advances, including Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, major investments in public infrastructure and education, and a highly progressive tax system – with the top income tax rate at 91% until 1963 – that helped finance those public goods and narrow the gap between rich and poor.

Contrary to the “End of History” theory embraced by many policymakers after the Cold War, and Margaret Thatcher’s famous insistence that “there is no alternative” to the extreme neoliberal capitalism that she and Ronald Reagan ushered in, societies always have political and economic alternatives. It is only a transparently self-serving choice by America’s corrupt ruling classes that saddles us with a system that keeps all decision-making power in their own hands in order to build their own wealth to the detriment of the country we all share.

We can see one alternative today in New York City, where Mayor Zohran Mamdani is pursuing a different set of priorities: expanding free childcare, making major investments in affordable housing, improving public transportation, and freezing rents for tenants in rent-stabilized apartments. Electoral politics can be part of the solution, but only if it reflects what ordinary people really want, instead of limited choices between oligarchic “lesser evils.”

Americans are demanding a renewal of social progress, with universal healthcare, quality public education, and all the things we need but can’t afford as long as this bloated, destructive war machine remains our government’s top priority. As Martin Luther King lamented in 1967, “I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube.”

Twenty-five years is a long time to keep moving in the wrong direction, especially when that direction involves endless war and the destruction of other countries. We are a long way from where most Americans would like our country to be. But we have a pretty good idea of what is wrong and what we need to do:

Stop throwing money at a broken, destructive war machine. Stop threatening and blockading our neighbors. Close overseas bases and bring our troops home. Tax the wealthy. Start rebuilding our country, and replace war and militarism with cooperation and problem solving. Take public ownership and responsibility for things we all need and use, like education, healthcare, housing, infrastructure, and utilities. Abolish ICE, and other militarized institutions that waste our national resources and do not serve the public good. Insist that the military be scaled back to its legitimate role of defending the United States against a possible, but very unlikely, foreign military attack.

If we have truly learned the lesson of the past twenty-five years, then we must translate it into policies that reflect that. The real test is not whether we can finally see what went wrong after 9/11. It is whether we are able to change course.

Medea Benjamin & Nicolas J.S. Davies
25 Years of War Was the Exact
Wrong Response to 9/11

Common Dreams
September 9, 2026



Related Off-site Links:
The U.S. Had a Choice After 9/11. It Chose Wrong – Elie Mystal (The Nation, September 11, 2026).
25 Years Since the September 11 Terrorist Attacks – Patrick Martin (World Socialist Web Site, September 11, 2026).
“Horror to Last a Lifetime”: Juan González on Covering 9/11 Attacks in New York City 25 Years Ago TodayDemocracy Now! (September 11, 2026).
On 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Attacks, Condemnation of Global “War on Terror” That Has Killed Millions – Jake Johnson (Common Dreams, September 11, 2026).
9/11 Began 25 Years of Non-stop War and Abuses of Power – Pam Bailey (Current Affairs, September 11, 2026).
On 9/11, We Said, “Never Forget.” Then, We All Forgot – John Pavlovitz (This Beautiful Mess, September 11, 2026).
Empire as a Way of Life: 25 Years Since 9/11 – Tariq Ali (Tariq Ali, September 11. 2026).
“Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump”: An Interview with Spencer AckermanDemocracy Now! (September 10, 2026).
The Burning Towers Foreshadowed a Burning World – Viet Thanh Nguyen (Zeteo, September 10, 2026).
Osama Bin Laden Won – Nick Turse (The Intercept, September 11, 2026).
America After 9/11: 25 Years of Fear, War, Surveillance and Permanent Emergency – John and Nisha Whitehead (The Rutherford Institute, September 8, 2026).
25 Years After 9/11, How Do We Build a Movement to Stop Endless Wars? – Mark Engler (Waging Nonviolence, September 9, 2026).
4.7 Million Dead, $8 Trillion: Counting the Devastating Human and Economic Costs of the Post‑9/11 WarsDemocracy Now! (September 10, 2026).
After 9/11, the “War on Terror” Was a War of Terror – Norman Solomon (Common Dreams, September 9, 2026).
“Let’s Just Round Them Up”: The Rise of Islamophobia in the Post-9/11 Domestic War on TerrorDemocracy Now! (September 9, 2026).
Muslim Children Should Not Carry the Burden of the 9/11 Attacks – Maryam Hasan (Common Dreams, September 10, 2026).
Son of 9/11 Victim Says “Please Stop” Exploiting Tragedy to Spread Anti-Muslim Bigotry – Brett Wilkins (Common Dreams, September 11, 2026).
25 Years Later: Afghan New Yorker Masuda Sultan Remembers 9/11 and 19 Relatives Killed in U.S. BombingDemocracy Now! (September 10, 2026).
25 Years After 9/11: Cover-Up of Air Quality Risk Proved to Be “Death Sentence” for ThousandsDemocracy Now! (September 8, 2026).
Top Democrats Called Out for Silence Over Racist Push for Mayor Zohran Mamdani to Skip 9/11 Memorial – Julia Conley (Common Dreams, September 9, 2026).
Mamdani Says NYC Can Honor 9/11 Victims by Building a City Where “We Run Toward One Another” – Julia Conley (Common Dreams, September 11, 2026).
Remembering Gay Hero Mark Bingham Who Saved Hundreds of Lives on 9/11 on Flight 93 – Lily Wakefield (Pink News, September 11, 2026).
Defining Images From the 9/11 Attacks – Reuters (September 10, 2026).
The 9/11 Decade: Timeline of Voices of Dissent on Democracy Now!Democracy Now! (September 11, 2012).
Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear, and the Selling of American Empire – A film by Jeremy Earp and Sut Jhally (2004).


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Remembering . . .
Remembering September 11 and Its Aftermath
A Letter to “Dear Abby” re. Responding to 9/11
Rebecca Solnit on How 9/11 Should Be Remembered
Karen Armstrong on the 9/11 Attacks: A “Flagrant and Wicked Abuse of Religion”
Kittredge Cherry on Mychal Judge, the “Gay Saint of 9/11”
Before (and After) the Poison
Let’s Also Honor the “Expendables”
Praying for George W. Bush
The Tenth Anniversary of the U.S. Invasion of Iraq


Image 1: Michael J. Bayly (Faces of Resistance: Images and Stories of Progressive Activism at the Turn of the Millennium (1997-2006)Gallery 9: Responding to 9/11 and the “War of Terror,” Part 2).

Image 2: Michael J. Bayly (Faces of Resistance: Images and Stories of Progressive Activism at the Turn of the Millennium (1997-2006)Gallery 9: Responding to 9/11 and the “War of Terror,” Part 3).

Following is the commentary at Faces of Resistance that accompanies this image.

Minneapolis resident Jack Rossbach was in New York City on September 11, 2001, representing Veterans for Peace at the United Nations’ Conference for Non-governmental Organizations. Exactly one year later, while participating in the weekly vigil outside of the Edina-based international weapons selling corporation, Alliant Techsystems, he recounted his experiences of that fateful day.

“I was on a bus going toward the U.N. for an early morning session when a woman with an incredibly strong New York accent starting asking what the people outside were looking and pointing at,” remembers Jack. “And then she started yelling about the hole in one of the World Trade Center towers and we soon all realized that a plane had crashed into it – into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.

“I’d taken training in responding to catastrophic events so I got off the bus, caught another one and headed back toward the World Trade Center. That’s when I saw the second plane fly behind the South Tower and then hit it from behind.

“[On the streets] everybody was talking to everybody else. I mean, communication was just wide open. I remember there was a young man by a truck and he was just shaking, just shaking – telling us how he saw these planes intentionally crash into the towers. I knew then it had been an intentional act by people who believe that killing is a way to solve problems.

“I couldn’t see the South Tower because the smoke from the North Tower was too thick to see it, although when the South Tower collapsed I saw the dust storm . . . The second tower came down about twenty minutes later.”

About his presence at the Alliant Techsystems vigil on the first anniversary of 9/11, Jack said: “I’m totally devoted to non-violent resolution to conflict and to somehow or other convincing [those who are part of] the war machine that they're going in the wrong direction. There is another way – a very successful other way.”


Thursday, September 10, 2026

Quote of the Day

I don’t hate America. I hate what America has been taught to tolerate.

I hate that we call basic things “radical.” Healthcare? Radical. Paid leave? Radical. Clean air? Radical. Kids not getting shot in math class? Somehow political.

Meanwhile, the loudest “patriots” are usually the same people telling struggling Americans to shut up, stop complaining, and be grateful. Grateful for what? A flag doesn’t pay rent. A bald eagle doesn’t cover insulin. Fireworks don’t fix bridges. And chanting “U.S.A.” doesn’t make a broken system less broken.

America has incredible people. That’s the tragedy. The people are better than the system they’ve been forced to defend.



See also the following Wild Reed posts:
Welcome to the U.S.A. . . . Officially
“Organized Sustained Systemic Resistance and Self-Defense Are Our Only Options”
Maha D. Blackfeather’s Message to the American People: “We’re Finally Seeing the Truth”
And So Here We Are
Chris Hedges on the End of the American Empire
Inauguration Day Thoughts (2025)
Progressive Perspectives on Where Democrats Went Wrong in 2024
Election Day U.S.A. (2020)
Marx and Class Struggle – Then and Now

Image: Artist unknown.


Wednesday, September 09, 2026

Stay Supple, Like a Reed


The hard and rigid
will be broken.
The soft and supple
will prevail.

Tao Te Ching
(Chapter 76)

A tree that will not bend snaps in the first real storm. Reeds that bend all the way to the ground stand up again the moment the wind passes.

This chapter of the Tao Te Ching uses the body itself as evidence. A living person is soft, flexible, yielding to touch. A corpse is stiff, rigid, resistant to movement. Life, in this observation, is not defined by strength in the way most people define it. It’s defined by pliability. Rigidity is what death looks like, physically and metaphorically both, whether it’s showing up in a body or in a mind that has hardened into fixed positions it refuses to update.

This cuts hard against the instinct to treat strength as firmness, standing your ground, refusing to bend under any circumstance. That kind of strength works right up until it meets a force larger than itself, and then it doesn’t bend, it breaks, because it never developed the capacity to absorb pressure without shattering. Softness isn’t the absence of strength. It’s a different kind of strength, one that survives precisely because it never needed to prove it couldn’t be moved.

This applies as much to identity and belief as it does to trees and bodies. A person who cannot update their views when reality contradicts them isn’t strong. They’re brittle, waiting for the specific pressure that will finally break what refused to bend even slightly. A person who stays supple, willing to adjust, willing to be wrong, willing to move without losing themselves in the moving, is the one still standing long after the rigid position has cracked.

Nothing that refuses to bend survives long enough to see what comes next. Only what stays supple gets to keep growing.

Pyramid Consciousness
via social media
August 29, 2026


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Oak and the Reed
Flexibility and Flow
Trusting the Flow
Trust and Surrender
Awakening the Wild Soul
The Fatherly Heart
Vulnerability Is Power
Love as Exploring Vulnerability
Love as "Quest and Daring and Growth"
Our Bodies Are Part of the Cosmos
Move Us, Loving God

Image 1: Michael J. Bayly (September 2023).
Image 2: Michael J. Bayly (June 2009).


Tuesday, September 08, 2026

Finding Our Center-Deep


Draw into thy Centre-deep . . . thy Heavens within.
. . . Take present care of the Heavens of your Mind.
Dive into your own Celestiality, and see with what
manner of spirits you are endued: for in them
the Powers do entirely lie for Transformation.


How do we find our center-deep? We have hid from it all our days, though it beams upon us like a lighthouse and continually shows us the path to the center. This path of light can be discovered in times of quietness and solitude, when we withdraw from the bustle of life and contemplate who and where we are in the great web of existence, when we still our minds from the spindle of anxiety and redefine our being as a partaker in the vast macrocosm.

In the stillness of our body, mind, and soul, we discover the special spirits who are our guides and helpers on the spiritual path. These spirits are not fantasies or psychological archetypes; they are real, living beings.

Finding out which spiritual helpers we are gifted with is the primary task for those who would seek out their center-deep. All of us have our own spiritual friends – those beings who do not have a human or earthly existence but who nevertheless exist and accompany us. We do not choose them; they and we are drawn to each other according to the gifts we share. They cooperate with us in the work of transformation; for, by our encounters with the spirits of our center-deep, we grow and change as we are accompanied and taught.

Sitting in silence, become aware of your own center-deep. What kind of landscape does it have? Who is there with you? What has drawn you both there?

– Caitlin Matthews
Excerpted from The Celtic Spirit:
Daily Meditations for the Turning Year

HarperSanFrancisco, 1999


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Time to Go Inwards
Within You
In the Stillness and Silence of This Present Moment
The Beauty and Challenge of Being Present in the Moment
No Other Time, No Other Place
Today I Will Be Still
Allow Everything to Rest Right Now
A Sacred Pause
Aligning With the Living Light
Mystical Participation
A Season of Listening
Eckhart Tolle on Silence and Stillness
A Prayer of Anchoring
Cultivating Stillness
Inner Peace
The Source Is Within You
The Most Sacred and Simple Mystery of All
The Centered Life as An Advent Life
“Call Upon Those You Love”
Mistwalking
Holy Encounters Where Two Worlds Meet
Forever Oneness
“Window, Mind, Thought, Air and Love”
To Dream, to Feel, to Listen

Image: Saaxiib Qurux Badan (“Beautiful Friend”), Minneapolis, MN – Michael J. Bayly (7/26/23).


Monday, September 07, 2026

Quote of the Day

I believe in God.

I will never understand how some believers think it helps their cause to push theocracy – whether it's American Christian nationalism, Iranian Islamic theocracy, or Jewish ethno-state.

If your idea of God is so weak it needs man-made enforcement, then I hate to break it to you but you don’t worship the All Powerful Creator; you work for an all fragile cult.

Faith that requires force is a farce. Let there be no compulsion in faith. Let us ensure separation of religion and state.

Qasim Rashid
via social media
September 7, 2026


See also the following Wild Reed posts:
Douglas Richer: “God is Love and There Is That of God Within Everyone”
The Mystic Jesus: “A Name for the Unalterable Love That All of Us Share”
Guidelines for the Advent of a Universal Mysticism: An Introduction | Part 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
In Search of a “Global Ethic”
One Wisdom
In the Garden of Spirituality: Richard Rohr – Part 1 | 2
Sufism: Way of Love, Tradition of Enlightenment, and Antidote to Fanaticism

Image: Artist unknown.


Friday, September 04, 2026

Kadeem Announces His Next Show


One of my favorite dancers, Kadeem Hosein (known as Kadeem En Pointe), has recently announced a second live / live-stream show. It’s a re-imaginging of Act II of Tchaikovsky’s The Nutcracker entitled “A World of Our Own” (For a review of Kadeem’s first show, “All the World’s a Stage,” click here.)


Following is Kadeem’s description of his December 19 show, along with his reasoning for encouraging folks to buy their ticket early.

__________________


I want to explain why booking early for my next show genuinely matters to me. My mission with everything I’m doing is to make ballet more accessible – financially, physically and emotionally.

I want to reach people who may never have seen a ballet before. People who have never felt represented or welcomed within ballet. People who love the art form but can’t easily get to a theatre because of where they live, accessibility, travel or cost.

That is a huge part of why I’m putting on this production in December. The Nutcracker is known around the world by even those who don't know ballet. This is an opportunity to really get the art form I love in front of so many people in a fresh (and hopefully exciting!) way.

For the in-person performance, I’ve deliberately priced 60% of the theatre at just £25 because I want a significant part of the auditorium to remain genuinely affordable.

The difficult reality is that, by doing that, even a completely sold-out theatre would only recoup around 35% of the planned production budget.

That means the livestream is an enormous part of making this possible.

The livestream this time isn’t an afterthought. It is central to what I’m trying to build. It means somebody thousands of miles away can experience the production at the same time as somebody sitting in the theatre, or even catch up for 14 days after if they can’t watch live but still want to be a part of this.

But because this is independently produced, many of the costs have to be committed to months before I know how many people will ultimately watch.

That’s why when you book matters almost as much as whether you book.

If you know you want to watch the performance, it would make an extraordinary difference to how much progress I could make towards funding the production if you booked right now.

It would give me the confidence to keep moving forward with not just this show but with what comes after it. More productions. More opportunities for artists. More accessible tickets. And perhaps, eventually, the opportunity to take this work to audiences in other cities and countries too.

So if you already know you’re going to watch, either on YouTube from anywhere in the world or with us at the theatre in London, I would be incredibly grateful if you booked early.

And I mean what I say about accessibility. If you genuinely want to watch the livestream but the ticket price is currently beyond what you can afford, please send me an email. I don’t want finances to be the reason somebody who wants to experience the production has to miss it.

Every booking helps me prove that there is an audience for a different way of making ballet – one that can be ambitious but still fairly priced and accessible at the same time.

I really hope we can keep building that together! ❤

Kadeem


Are you interested in supporting Kadeem beyond purchasing a ticket to his new show?

Well, you can join me in making a one time or recurring donation. Another way is by purchasing a copy of his most recent creative project. I’ll let Kadeem say more . . .

My new coffee table book The Pointe Of Passion is now available for you to have in your home. I hope that this book can serve as a reminder of perseverance and passion and can maybe insipire at least one person to find their passion – whatever that might be 🖤


Trust me, it’s a beautiful publication. My copy arrived in the mail just last week!


Here’s more about the book from Kadeem's website:

The Pointe of Passion is the first true photographic archive curated by Kadeem En Pointe, bringing together more than a decade of images captured in locations around the world. It is printed as a premium 98 page, 8 × 10 inch hardback coffee table book.

From the earliest photographs en pointe in public to the work being created today, this coffee table book traces an artistic journey through pointe shoes, tutus, public spaces and more. Alongside already shared images are never-before-seen photographs, offering an intimate look at the evolution of a project that has challenged perceptions of who ballet is for.

More than a collection of photographs, The Pointe of Passion is an exploration of becoming. It asks who ballet has traditionally made room for and what becomes possible when those boundaries begin to shift. It is a celebration of passion and the belief that beauty can be found and created in the most unexpected places.

Unlike many coffee table books, The Pointe of Passion has been published entirely independently. Every stage of its creation – from curating the archive to designing, printing and fulfilling each order – is funded and managed by Kadeem, allowing the project to remain true to the vision that has guided it from the very beginning. Every purchase directly supports the continued creation of independent ballet projects that seek to make the art form more accessible.

Signature and personalisation will be added to the first blank page on the inside, unless otherwise requested.


Click here to purchase The Pointe of Passion.






Related Off-site Links:
Kadeem’s Official Website
“Being a Ballet Dancer Is Years of Hard Work, But It’s All Worth It” Says Kadeem En Pointe – Stuart Norval (France 24, February 26, 2026).
Men en Pointe: Ballet Dancers Kick Against Gender Stereotypes – Matilda Martin (The Guardian, March 10, 2021).





For previous posts about Kadeem, see:
Kadeem
A Message in Dance That Challenges, Inspires and Liberates
Kadeem En Pointe: Finding Freedom in Dance
A Mesmerizing Performance


See also the following dance-related Wild Reed posts:
The Soul of a Dancer
The Trouble with the Male Dancer – Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
Dancer Calvin Royal III: Stepping Into His Light
The Premise of All Forms of Dance
The Art of Dancing as the Supreme Symbol of the Spiritual Life
The Power of Dance
“Then I Shall Leap Into Love”
Love’s the Only Dance
We All Dance
Not Whether We Dance, But How
The Dance of Life
And As We Dance . . .
Our Dance
“I Came Alive With Hope”
Finding Balance in the Presence of the Beloved
Our Bodies Are Part of the Cosmos
Flexibility and Flow
Move Us, Loving God
A Prayer for Dancers
Trusting the Flow
Aristotle Papanikolaou on How Being Religious Is Like Being a Dancer


Image: Photo by @mandyleft


Photo of the Day


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Where We Belong
Heavy Seas and Grey Skies
Autumn Sky
Photo of the Day – June 17, 2023
Storm Clouds Over Minneapolis
Photo of the Day – December 7, 2019
Photo of the Day – September 4, 2019
Sunset Reflections and Vapour Trail
Photo of the Day – April 8, 2019
Photo of the Day – July 13, 2017
Bde Maka Ska Sunset
Bde Maka Ska Skies
Photo of the Day – August 19, 2014
Photo of the Day – June 18, 2010
Pacific Skies

Image: Michael J. Bayly.


Thursday, September 03, 2026

Progressive Perspectives on the Legacy of Gloria Steinem

Before becoming one of America’s most celebrated “feminist” icons, Gloria Steinem [who died yesterday in New York City at age 92] first participated in a CIA-backed anti-communist project that organized American youth participation in anti-communist international festivals during the Cold War. She later publicly acknowledged the CIA connection and defended her involvement. Her actual history matters because CIA anti-communism was not some politically neutral commitment to democracy; it was deeply entangled with U.S. imperialism, the suppression of freedom movements, and the policing of which forms of liberation were considered acceptable.

And that contradiction matters when we talk about her white feminism.

The feminism that became nationally legible was disproportionately shaped by white, middle-class women whose experiences were often treated as universal, and Steinem helped facilitate that process. Meanwhile, Black women, Indigenous women, women of color more broadly, and working-class women had long been articulating forms of liberation that could not be reduced to gender alone. Women confronting colonialism, racism, and economic exploitation understood that oppression operates through multiple, interconnected systems, not through a single axis of inequality.

That is the structural violence of white feminism: it can oppose forms of sexism that harm privileged women while reproducing racial and class hierarchies over whose suffering is centered, whose politics are considered legitimate, and who gets remembered as the face of women’s liberation.

We do not need to pretend Steinem was responsible for feminism.

Not now. Not ever.

Layla Rafaoui
via social media
September 3, 2026


I had to deal with the twisted legacy of Gloria Steinem constantly as a writer, educator and activist from Toledo, Ohio, which was also her home town where she was born and raised. She was held up as some kind of revolutionary saint despite doing more harm than good for this world. Instead of the mythology built up around her, her actual story tells a very different reality about what she stood for. In my eyes she reduced feminism to a shallow identity politics devoid of class and race politics and completely devoid of a critique of the devastating policies of the U.S. Empire around the world. She was a tool of the elite forces from her career as an anti-communist operative for the CIA, her long lasting friendship with Henry Kissinger, to her campaigning for zionist war criminal Hillary Clinton and coming up with the Bernie Bros slander.

Many of the headlines commemorating the death of Gloria Steinem at 92 read like this: “Feminist icon, trailblazer, journalist.” They leave out one very salient episode of her career: Steinem’s years as a paid CIA operative running the anti-communist Independent Research Service in the late ’50s and ’60s. There was, of course, nothing “Independent” about the “service.” It was an agency front group, fully funded by the CIA. The “research” it did was on left-leaning student activists, often conducted by sending undercover operatives to spy on their activities on campuses and at youth festivals. Though Steinem eventually cut ties with the Agency, her brand of feminism downplayed class-based politics.

Jeffrey St. Clair
via social media
September 3, 2026


Feminist icon Gloria Steinem has passed away. I must admit, when I observed her career early on I was enthralled with her journalism and organizing. But as the months turned into years, she was sadly absorbed into the very system she fought against.

Here’s some evidence: After several government documents were declassified, it was revealed Steinem worked for the CIA. From 1958 to 1962, Steinem served as the director of the Independent Research Service (IRS), an organization established and funded by the CIA. Its mission was to counter Soviet influence at youth events worldwide, specifically by sending American non-communist students and activists to the World Youth Festivals in Vienna (1959) and Helsinki (1962).

When the magazine Ramparts exposed widespread CIA funding of youth and student groups in 1967, Steinem spoke openly about her role. She confirmed that she knew the CIA was bankrolling the organization and defended the arrangement. Steinem famously stated that “if I had a choice I would do it again.”

Transitioning into the 1990s, Steinem became a defender of the sexual predator, Bill Clinton. She drew sharp criticism for a March 1998 New York Times op-ed titled “Feminists and the Clinton Question,” in which she defended President Clinton against allegations made by Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and Monica Lewinsky. Steinem wrote that even if the allegations were true “for the sake of argument,” Clinton was not guilty of sexual harassment and argued that his conduct amounted to a “clumsy sexual pass.”

During the 2016 presidential campaign, she was a surrogate for Bill Clinton’s war criminal wife, Hillary Clinton. During an appearance on Bill Maher’s program, she suggested young women were only joining Bernie Sanders’ campaign to meet boys. She told Maher, “When you’re young, you’re thinking, 'Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie.’” She later apologized.

For me, I place Steinem in the same category as a figure like Noam Chomsky: people I recognized as heroes, only to be disappointed and let down as they were slowly absorbed into the Deep State and neoliberal structure. Yes, I don’t deny Steinem inspired a lot of women, but how many of those women know the aforementioned about her?

Dorothy Lennon
via social media
September 3, 2026


Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA and called its members “enlightened,” “liberal,” and “honorable.” She never apologized and instead said she “would do it again.” The CIA overthrew governments, propped up dictators, murdered opponents, and aligned itself with the most oppressive forces on the planet. Its interventions led to severe and systematic repression of women in countries around the world. Some of its agents used sexual abuse as a technique of coercion. Workplace sexual abuse was common within its own ranks. And the agency itself systematically discriminated against women. “Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the theater?”

Craig Mokhiber
via social media
September 3, 2026


Steinem’s concept of a “liberated woman” (who, as she quipped, has sex before marriage and a job after) directly contradicted the the very heart of the radical movement’s argument – that women are oppressed as a class and can’t make themselves free individually.

Where did her politics come from? She seemed to have one foot in the establishment from the start, dating John F. Kennedy speechwriter Ted Sorensen; then Franklin Thomas, who would soon lead the Ford Foundation; and, in the 1980s, real estate developer Mortimer Zuckerman. Vivian Gornick recalled, “Gloria was uptown; we were downtown. She hung out with Establishment figures; we had only ourselves.”

[. . .] By the late 1980s, Steinem was famous for Ms. and for being the radical feminist but had not yet written a book laying out her vision of feminism (the anthology Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions in 1983 collected her writing in Ms. and elsewhere).

When it finally came, Revolution From Within: A Book of Self-Esteem (1992) affirmed everything about her politics that had dismayed the radicals who started the movement. The book, which received a six-figure advance, continued the women’s magazine line that women needed to make internal changes.

“Without self-esteem, the only change is an exchange of masters; with it, there is no need for masters,” she wrote. Of course, we don’t have masters because we need them but because they need us. This basic inversion was symptomatic of her politics.

By contrast, women’s liberation feminists argued that women, like other oppressed people, are in constant struggle against our bonds – a concept they called the “Pro-Woman Line” – in fact, we take every bit of space available and find ingenious workarounds even when there is none. It was discrimination, exploitation, punishment, and constant everyday pressure that constrained us. This hard-won analysis was developed through the main program of the movement, consciousness-raising.

Ms. watered down this important organizing tool, publishing a guide to consciousness-raising that used the name and the form but missed the substance, reducing it to a therapy group where women blew off steam and got sisterly support. The original idea was to use the data that emerged in testimony to assess women’s true situation, dig at the root cause, and analyze who benefits. The program was inspired by the Southern civil rights movement’s “tell it like it is” public testifying and had parallels in the Chinese Revolution’s “speak bitterness” sessions. It was not intended as a safe space.

As corporate attacks in the late 1970s and early ’80s destroyed unions and working-class living conditions and wages plunged for all workers, Betty Friedan and feminist radicals alike argued that advancing women’s equality now required confrontation with corporate power to get guarantees of childcare and health care, paid family leave, and shorter work hours for everyone. Friedan called it the “second stage” of feminism in a book by that name. Redstockings called for the abolition of private health insurance companies and a robust social wage, to give women independence from men and employers.

The Ms. wing of the movement fragmented into thousands of non-profits, competing for grants from rich people by each proposing “winnable” small-bore solutions to the wreckage left by the employer offensive. This blinkered feminist vision was reflected in the Democratic Party establishment. Meanwhile, long hours, low pay, and worsening conditions for raising kids made women vulnerable to a right-wing nostalgia for to the “glorious thirty” postwar years of family-supporting jobs and stay-at-home moms.

[. . .] Women’s liberation movement pioneers, to a woman, came out of the civil rights movement, the antiwar movement, and the student left. They believed that consistent feminism leads to socialism, and vice versa. Following Simone de Beauvoir, they wanted to dig deep and abolish the exploitation of women and the oppression required to maintain it. Starting in the 1960s, they planned and built a successful radical movement that profoundly changed the situation of women in the United States and reverberated worldwide.

It’s a crime that their movement was for fifty years personified by someone who never shared its goals.

Jenny Brown
Excerpted from “Gloria Steinem Was the
Godmother of Neoliberal Feminism

Jacobin
September 4, 2026


As the media machine prepares to unleash a flood of fawning tributes, the usual suspects will inevitably honor Gloria Steinem – a spectacle revealing little about liberation and everything about their own bankrupt politics, brazen opportunism, willful blindness to historical fact, and the hackneyed claims to “complexity” and “nuance” held so dear by these intellectual mercenaries.

How does one assess a life after it ends? Those who benefit and are in a good position in this system will honor Gloria Steinem for contributing to stabilizing a system oppressive to many and dis-aligning them from revolutionary ideas – this is not what women want and need.

The death of Gloria Steinem will undoubtedly unleash an avalanche of sanitized obituaries, performative tributes, and ruling-class hagiography. Western media will mourn her as a “groundbreaking icon” and a pioneer for gender equality. But for the global majority – the millions of women across the Third World and the working-class masses who remain crushed beneath the boot of imperialist exploitation – her passing marks the end of a legacy that fundamentally weaponized feminist rhetoric to protect the empire.

Steinem did not liberate women; she weaponized women’s liberation to serve the interests of U.S. hegemony. The foundational sin of her career was never a mere footnote: her early leadership of the CIA-backed Independent Research Service in the late 1950s and 1960s was explicitly designed to undermine anti-imperialist, socialist, and communist youth movements at international youth festivals. When exposed, Steinem didn’t apologize; she defended the covert arm of the U.S. imperialism, describing its operatives as "liberal and honorable." This was not an innocent blunder of youth, but the blueprint for her entire career.

Through Ms. magazine and her manufactured status as the singular, polished face of “second-wave feminism,” Steinem pioneered a dangerous model of liberal counter-insurgency. As radical feminists, Black panthers, and anti-capitalist women were rising up to demand the dismantling of the triad of imperialism, white supremacy, and capitalism, Steinem offered a palatable alternative: bourgeois, reformist faux feminism.

This imperial feminism detached gender oppression from its economic and geopolitical roots. It told American women that liberation meant climbing corporate ladders, breaking glass ceilings inside warmongering state institutions, and achieving parity within an exploitative system – all while the very empire housing them carpet-bombed, starved, and destabilized nations across the Global South. By framing patriarchy as an abstract cultural enemy separate from class struggle and U.S. military domination, her brand of activism effectively depoliticized the feminist movement and severed its solidarity with anti-imperialist struggles worldwide.

It was precisely this co-optation that radical groups like Redstockings rightly called out in 1975. They recognized Ms. magazine and Steinem’s elevated media stature as a parallel organization meant to channel radical anger into benign electoral politics. When challenged on her intelligence connections and corporate backing, her apparatus used legal threats and publishing pressure to suppress internal dissent, silencing the very radical women whose ideas she had watered down and monetized.

For the global majority, Steinem’s legacy is not one of freedom, but of co-optation. Her pro-imperialist ideology gave feminist cover to U.S. soft power, making Western liberal democracy look progressive while its economic structures continued to siphon labor and resources from women in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. She normalized a brand of identity politics that allows female CEOs, drone operators, and politicians to be celebrated as triumphs for “womanhood,” even as their actions inflict violence on millions of impoverished women globally.

We must refuse the myth-making that surrounds her death. True liberation for women will never come from the handshakes of CIA handlers, corporate sponsors, or ruling-class media elites. It will come from the destruction of the imperialist, capitalist structures that Steinem worked so tirelessly to legitimize. Her death should serve as a stark reminder: a feminism that aligns itself with the empire is no feminism at all – it is merely the soft edge of oppression.

Sarah Raymundo
“An Anti-Requiem for Gloria Steinem,
A Cold War Icon (1934-2026)”
via social media
September 3, 2026


Yes, Gloria Steinem was a liberal feminist, although she sometimes called herself a radical feminist, and I think she was often more radical than many leftists give her credit for. And I think radical feminist collective Redstockings’ 1975 investigative essay about Steinem, CIA, and the defanging of radical feminist movements are fair and important critiques – or at least are asking important questions that Steinem did not really answer to. I do think Ms. and some of the things Steinem said, and definitely many things said by folks who loved Steinem, were too focused on individual women making it to the top and often underplayed class and racial analyses (I don't think Steinem ever completely ignored these). I strongly oppose her defense of sexist Bill Clinton and support for hawkish Hillary. In my drag I did and continue to make fun of some of her goofiest claims, like that young women vote for Bernie because boys are voting for him. But even that out of touch, condescending snippet from a decade old Bill Maher interview was decontextualized from a more complex and thoughtful conversation.

Intellectually, politically, my own feminism is much more informed by Shulamith Firestone and Redstockings, Kate Millet, the Combahee River Collective, Gayle Rubins’s early writing, Monique Wittig, early Andrea Dworkin, etc. But the cultural, emotional, and material legacy of Steinem’s life influence me and my feminism in ways I probably can’t even identify.

Steinem was not the queen of feminism, the voice of feminism, the single hero we all need to follow. and she was someone who did have an immense impact. We don’t have to worship her to appreciate her. She devoted her life and work to vital causes. She created platforms for women to share their stories, to find self worth, to effect change. She worked on legal and political campaigns to better the lives of millions. Steinem also was able to follow not only lead, which many social justice leader struggle with. For some who are grieving Steinem, I hope you won’t ignore the many younger women and feminists who continue, critique, cherished, and transform Steinem’s work and the womens movment of the 1970s. Feminism isn’t one person, one identity, one strategy. It doesn’t die with Steinem. Steinem was flawed, occasionally frustrating, and endlessly passionate about making a better world.

Max Brumberg-Kraus
via social media
September 4, 2026


Related Off-site Links:
Gloria Steinem, Trailblazing Journalist and Activist, Dies at 92 – Juliana Kim (NPR, September 3, 2026).
Gloria Steinem Was the Godmother of Neoliberal Feminism – Jenny Brown (Jacobin, September 4, 2026).
Gloria Steinem: The CIA, White Feminism, Intersectionality and COINTELPRO – United Panther Party (September 3, 2026).
Feminist Icon Gloria Steinem Was An Anti-Communist CIA Operative Who Kept Feminism From Discussing ClassMedium (February 11, 2024).

UPDATE: Gloria Steinem’s Legacy Is Messier Than Her Defenders or Her Critics Want to Admit – Stacey Patton (Dr Stacey Patton, September 5, 2026).

Image: Glenn Lowson.


Wednesday, September 02, 2026

The “Threshold Month” of September


September never arrives all at once. It comes quietly through cooler mornings, earlier sunsets, ripening berries and the first leaves beginning to turn. Summer may still be holding the afternoons, but something in the air has changed. The light is softer. The shadows are longer. The evenings are asking us to come home.

This is a threshold month, neither entirely summer nor fully autumn. It gives us time to notice what is fading, gather what we want to keep and prepare for the darker months ahead. You may feel drawn to clean your altar, light candles earlier, return to neglected books or make your home feel warmer and safer. Follow that pull. Your body often recognises the changing season before the calendar does.

September is standing with the door open. What are you ready to carry through?

Hex and Shadow Chronicles
via Facebook
September 1, 2026


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Crowned Spirit of the Wild
First Signs of “By Far the Most Paradoxical” Season
Late Summer Blooms – 2025 | 2016
Summer’s End – 2024 | 2021
Threshold Musings

Image: Michael J. Bayly.


Tuesday, September 01, 2026

“Complex, Brilliant, Revolutionary”: Remembering Wendell Berry, 1934-2026


Writes Julia Conley . . .

The death of poet, activist, and conservationist Wendell Berry on Monday [August 31, 2026] was called by one labor organizer “a loss of morality and clarity and compassion,” as admirers of Berry’s lifelong crusade to defend the environment honored his memory by sharing favorite poems and other works.

Berry died at the age of 92 at his home in Port Royal, Kentucky, where he spent decades writing about his farming the land, teaching, and writing about the need to fight “the concentration of farmland into larger and larger holdings and fewer and fewer hands,” as he wrote in one of his best-known works, The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture.

“The true measure of agriculture is not the sophistication of its equipment, the size of its income, or even the statistics of its productivity, but the good health of the land,” wrote Berry in the essay collection, published in 1977.

He stressed that the “increase in overhead, debt, and dependence on machines” in the agricultural sector “is a matter of complex significance, and its agricultural significance cannot be disentangled from its cultural significance.”

The Unsettling of America was one of more than 50 works published by Berry, whose commitment to interdependent community-building, small farms, and the protection of nature was woven into his fiction, poems, and essays alike.

In America magazine in 2021, Jon Sweeney wrote in a review of What I Stand On, a collection of Berry’s writing, that “he writes about what he has experienced, what he has learned, and always with humility for what he does not know.”

“The natural world is his primary teacher: its rhythms, its largesse, its mysteries,” Sweeney wrote. “And in the essays, the natural world often reflects how change in humans is also natural, inexplicable, and possible. I think this is what many who love his writing appreciate most about Berry, whether they realize it or not.”

Berry traveled and taught briefly at New York University as a young man before returning to his Kentucky roots, remaining there for six decades. He told The New York Times in 2018 that writing and working in rural Kentucky “made a permanent connection between me and my native place, and with its landscape. The landscape was there to check me if I was wrong. I could never go away and make up stuff at cocktail parties about the backwoods of Kentucky. I worked with people here in all walks of life and learned from them.”

In his 1969 essay “The Long-Legged House,” named for the two-room cabin his ancestors had lived in, to which Berry returned to write his books and other works, he offered an early warning about the harm humans and their industries – agribusiness and fossil fuels – were doing to the Earth.

“We have lived our lives by the assumption that what was good for us would be good for the world,” wrote Berry. “We have been wrong. We must change our lives so that it will be possible to live by the contrary assumption, that what is good for the world will be good for us. And that requires that we make the effort to know the world and learn what is good for it.”

The writer Joyce Carol Oates said on social media on Monday that “long before it became a more familiar subject, Wendell Berry was conscious of the endangered natural environment; indeed, Berry helped to raise this consciousness.”

In addition to making his views on the environment and corporate control over the natural world known through his writing, Berry took part in direct actions to protest mining, war, and capital punishment.

He rallied against the U.S. war in Vietnam, saying, “Peace is more important than victory,” and was arrested in 1979 for protesting the Marble Hill Nuclear Power Plant in Madison, Indiana. Thirty years later he was one of thousands who marched on Washington against the Capitol Power Plant, and two years after that, in 2011, Berry spent the night at a sit-in in the Kentucky governor’s office to protest mountaintop removal mining.

In 2009 he also withdrew his writings from the collection of University of Kentucky, his alma mater, to express opposition to the university’s $7 million donation from a coal producer; the school then named a dormitory Wildcat Coal Lodge.

“I was taught that taking care of land was one of the primary human responsibilities,” Berry told the student newspaper, the Kentucky Kernel, at the time. “In the long run, the top soil, the forests, and the woodland of this state will be more valuable than the coal deposits.”

Silas House, another writer who hailed from Kentucky, said that with Berry’s death, “another great light” had gone out.

House described the writer as “complex. Brilliant. Revolutionary.”



Related Off-site Links:
Beloved Writer and Environmentalist Wendell Berry Has Died at Age 92 – Tilda Wilson and Noah Adams (NPR News, September 1, 2026).
‘Another Great Light Gone Out’: Kentucky Author and Activist Wendell Berry Dies at 92 – Linda Blackford (Lexington Herald Leader, September 1, 2026).
Wendell Berry, Kentucky-born Author Who Advocated a Simpler Life, Has Died at 92 – Hillel Italie (Associated Press via PBS News, September 1, 2026).
What Wendell Berry Taught Me About Heaven – Russell Moore (Christianity Today, September 2, 2026).

Image: Wendell Berry reads one of his poems at the 2014 Festival of Faiths. (Photo: Wikimedia/Creative Commons)


Monday, August 31, 2026

August Vignettes



See also the previous Wild Reed August 2026 posts:
Abdul El-Sayed: The Disruptor Michigan (and the Country) Needs
Why the American Political Establishment Is Panicking
“Like a Stream Running Into the Ocean”
No Plausible Justification
Jonny Rashid: Quote of the Day – August 10, 2026
Kadeem En Pointe: Finding Freedom in Dance
MPR’s Major (But Unsurprising) Failure
Photo of the Day – August 13, 2026
Rejecting “Cartoonish Conclusions” About Marxism and Dealing with the “Actual Architecture of Our Current Reality”
Mapping Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Defection from the “Obama Hypnosis”
Ashley Stevens: Quote of the Day – August 18, 2026
Mysticism and Miracles
“Woke 1.0” as Revisionist History
A Mesmerizing Performance
Choosing to Awaken
“Rest in Peace, Dear Prophet Dolly”
Genevieve Fraser: Quote of the Day – August 26, 2026
Four Political Commentaries Worth Viewing
Spider-Man in Minneapolis
Remembering the Dolly Parton and Dionne Warwick Duet . . . and Celebrating Dolly as a “Kind of American Folk Saint”
Memes of the Times
The Crowned Spirit of the Wild

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
August Vignettes (2025)
August Vignettes (2024)
August Vignettes (2023)
The Summer of My Wildebeest-of-a-Bike
A Summer Sunset Psalm
The Dance of a Summer Day
Summer Vignettes (2022)
O Breath of Summer
Summer Blooms
Eternal Summer

Images: Michael J. Bayly.