Saturday, December 25, 2010

John Dear on Celebrating the Birth of the Nonviolent Jesus



I share today an excerpt from John Dear, SJ's latest column in the National Catholic Reporter and wish all my readers . . .

. . . a happy and peace-filled Christmas!


I’ve been thinking about Christmas as a time to celebrate the life of the nonviolent Jesus because his life is so remarkable, to say the least. Of course he is the God of peace present in our world of war, but I can barely wrap my mind around the mystery of the Incarnation.

So instead I consider Jesus’ whole life and discover there, in the cumulative effect, an entirely new way of life, something rarely seen, something rarely invoked in the mass media and the churches – the most perfect life of love, compassion, nonviolence, peacemaking and resistance to injustice and empire.

I see Jesus as a nonviolent revolutionary who sets in motion God’s peace movement for the disarmament of every heart, every nation and every age. His nonviolent revolution continues to this day and, as participants in it, we celebrate his birth and his revolutionary life.

Poverty, war, executions, global warming, drug killings, nuclear weapons – it’s hard to believe that Jesus’ life two thousand years ago has sparked the coming of new peace. That’s why as people of faith, Christmas invites us once again to dig deeper spiritual roots, to continue our own personal conversion to Christ, to believe in his Way and to carry on his Gospel witness.

When I look at his entire life, I’m challenged once again to renounce violence, let go of resentment, turn away from meanness, throw away despair, choose life, adopt his brave nonviolence, forgive everyone, offer compassion, practice universal love, and seek that Christmas gift of “peace on earth.” As we ponder his lifelong active nonviolence, we will rejoice because Jesus really offers us a Way out of madness.

– John Dear, SJ
"Celebrating the Birth of the Nonviolent Jesus"
National Catholic Reporter
December 21, 2010



See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
A Bush Christmas (2009)
A Story of Searching and Discovery (Christmas 2008)
Clarity and Hope (Christmas 2007)
A Christmas Reflection by James Carroll
The Christmas Truce of 1914


Image: Artist unknown.

Friday, December 24, 2010

Censored Gay Catholic High School Student Honored by Peers

.
Writes Michael Jones of GayRights.org:


And then comes the best part of the whole story. . . . Earlier this month, [the classmates of Sean Simonsen (pictured at right)] voted Sean to be Grand Knight (which is equivalent to prom king) for the high school winter formal. That's right, Catholic students all voted for the gay guy to represent them, and this despite the institutional Catholic Church's continued insistence that gay people are less than their straight peers.

Now that's what you call justice.

Meanwhile, even though the school newspaper never republished Sean's article, they did institute a new policy that should prevent them from having to take down articles in the future.

Kudos to Minnesota, for showing in so many ways that Catholics in the pews believe that equal rights for LGBT people can be consistent with their faith.




See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Two Editorials that Benilde-St. Margaret's Catholic High School Doesn't Want You to Read
Quotes of the Day - November 16, 2010
CPCSM and the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis (Part 4)


Twilight


This is where the shadows come to play
‘twixt the day and night;
Dancing and skipping
along a chink of light.

Somewhere in between
the waxing and the waning wave.
Somewhere in between
what the song and the silence say.

Somewhere in between

the ticking and the tocking clock.
Somewhere in a dream between
sleep and waking up.

Somewhere in between

breathing out and breathing in;
Like twilight is neither night nor morning.


“Somewhere in Between”
by Kate Bush
(From the 2005 album, Aerial)






To listen to "Somewhere In Between" by Kate Bush, click here.


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Somewhere In Between
Photo of the Day - December 19, 2010
Sharing a Good Thing


Images: Michael J. Bayly.

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Quote of the Day

.
Did Jesus really exist?

Well, yes, he did, and yes he does. We look for proof of Christ in many different places, none of them where he is. If we spend too much time looking in ancient Palestine, we won’t see the rest of history. If we demand the documentary evidence about Bethlehem, we forget what’s going on next door.

Christ lived, and yes, Christ died, and Christ lives today in his resurrection. His life in every Christian* is how he lives in history, and how he lives next door. Of course the hierarchy has fouled up the story. Pope Benedict is on the mark now, with very little very late. He says, in his Christmas message, "We must ask ourselves what was wrong in our proclamation, in our whole way of living the Christian life, to allow [the clergy sex abuse scandal] to happen."

Despite its foibles, despite its weaknesses, the church we see in Rome is only a fraction of its wealth. The real center, the real wealth of Christianity toils day by dreary day at ordinary jobs, lives ordinary lives, prays ordinary prayers. To me, that is the key. It’s not the history or the artifacts; it’s not the manuscripts and scrolls. It’s how the story is lived.

– Phyllis Zagano
"Finding Christ at Christmas"
The National Catholic Reporter
December 22, 2010


* Actually, I wouldn't limit Christ to living only in Christians. Christ – God's spirit of compassion and justice – is within every human and imbued throughout all creation. The names we give this sacred, transforming presence my vary from religion to religion and culture to culture, but the omnipresent reality of it remains.

Image: “In His Image” by Bill Zdinak.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Thoughts on Transformation (Part 3)


Concluding The Wild Reed’s 2010 Advent series, I share today a second except from Flora Slosson Wuellner’s contribution to the March/April 1991 issue of Weavings: A Journal of the Christian Spiritual Life. This particular issue focuses on transformation, and Flora’s contribution is an insightful reflection entitled “Transformation: Our Fear, Our Longing.” In the following excerpt she explores what she sees as four characteristics of God’s way of transformation.

____________________________________


I see four major characteristics of God’s way of transformation, as contrasted with enforced change from outside forces.

The first of these is the scriptural witness that God’s transformation of us does not deny our humanity or wipe out our identity. There are, unfortunately, some forms of spirituality that teach that God is not concerned with our needs, longings, or unique identities, and that spiritual growth consists of denying our humanness. But in both the Old and New Testaments we see a very different thrust. We see God’s passionate interest in and concern for our human condition. . . . The scriptures witness that God loves humanity, has called it good (in spite of all problems and failings) and has faith in it and purpose for it. In the second century the great church father Irenaeus of Lyons put it this way: “The glory of God is the fully alive human being.”

This understanding might be termed incarnational spirituality. In this way of spiritual experience, we are invited more deeply into the rich challenge of the flesh, the earth, and the human personality. The transformation God brings us is seen supremely in Jesus, always involved with the encounter, healing, and release of our full humanity.

As we unite with God, we are invited into bonding rather than bondage. Nothing that has been created is to be enslaved or destroyed. God did not create us as amusing toys to be manipulated and then swept off the board. We are given life, guided, transformed through ecstasy and anguish unspeakable, by love immeasurable, for cosmic purpose unimaginable.

Secondly, God’s transformation of us unites us with our deepest longings. We are told that God says: “I make all things new” (Rev. 21:5, RSV), but though the inner unfolding indeed feels surprising, it also feels strangely and poignantly familiar. It feels like coming to a home we had long forgotten, or like waking from confused dreams to see the sunshine and a loved face near ours. God’s transformation at work within us brings us increasingly closer to the person we have always (perhaps subconsciously) longed to be. How could it be otherwise if, indeed, “the kingdom of God is in the midst of you” (Luke 17:21, RSV)?

. . . A third manifestation of God’s transformation within us is that it always involves our deep healing. Frequently we experience blocks, plateaus, even partial regressions in our inner growing. Why do we keep falling back into the old patterns? This can be discouraging when we see what exciting possibilities lie within us. Even though we know we have grown in many wonderful ways, still there are parts within us that are untransformed, childish, full of fear and anger.

. . . What does this mean? There is deep, unencountered woundedness, perhaps passed on for generations, that blocks our inner growing. Deep unhealed fear, anger, grieving, loneliness, brought about by the assaults, lovelessness, and manipulations of much of the life around us have made us resistant to trust and love. Often it is difficult to discern that we are wounded and blocked by unhealed pain. We have become so used to deep pain and defensive/offensive reaction that it has become part of the air we breathe. We can learn to listen to our pain by attentiveness to our negative side: our tendency to worry, hair-trigger anger, compulsive over-control, inertia and procrastination, manipulating or closing off to others, constant broken resolutions.

Too often in some forms of spiritual teaching we have been told to denounce or ignore our faults, merely confessing them as sins, and then using willpower to increase our positive aspects. But if we learn to listen attentively to our faults (which is not the same as condoning or giving in to them), they can teach us as much about our pain and needs as our longings can teach us about the gifts that lie beneath them.

For example, if we have a tendency always to be worried and anxious, and that does not seem to change no matter how much we pray about it, no matter how many good resolutions we make, we can dialogue with our worry, asking ourselves: “What are you afraid of?” We should ask this question with sincere respect, a genuine desire to know, not with contempt or scorn. And then we can ask it again, and keep asking, each time at a deeper level. . . . Is this chronic worry a signal given to us by our deep self that there is a child within us who feels helpless and frightened? A child whose time for healing has come?

Such a condition is not reached by mere confession of sins. Such a condition cannot be overcome by resolutions and willpower. There is a child in there who needs healing. We begin to understand something of the compassion God has for us. We begin to share with others what we really feel. We begin to release these inner hurt and frightened children into God’s hands for healing.

Why is this central pain, which has for so long blocked our growth, not automatically, spontaneously healed by God’s love without our awareness and asking? Much of it is, of course. In many ways we are healed at subconscious levels without consciously knowing it. But apparently there are some forms of inner pain whose healing needs intentional consent. God’s love always surrounds us, our unreconciled areas as well as our light-filled areas. But God's full healing seems to wait for our longing and consent. Is this because we are not helpless puppets, but created to be children, heirs, spouses, partners, co-creators with God, our free consent a crucial part of the creative wisdom of growing?

The fourth great sign I see of God’s way of transformation, and perhaps this is the greatest, is that our inner unfolding rises from a living relationship with God rather than from laws and commands. Somewhere I have read that the Sermon on the Mount is not a series of orders, but rather a description of what begins to happen as we grow closer to God through Christ.


Abide in me and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself unless it abides in the vine, neither can you unless you abide in me.

- John 15:4 (RSV)


This is said by the living Christ to our hearts. We cannot bring fourth the full fruits of the Christian life unless we are rooted and growing in the Source of that life. . . . The further we are from this living relationship with the Christ, the more lifeless, the less exciting and transforming becomes our Christianity. How do we most deeply bond with the Living One? Just as each identity is unique, so is each relationship. But those who have lived the longest and most profoundly with the Christ tell us to let our breathing become the breathing of God’s breadth of life. They show us the healing power of sharing each need, each hurt, each longing with the Christ who walks with us each moment of the day. They witness to us that all that is within us is loved compassionately and searched for passionately by the Risen One who only asks our consent to “come quickly” with the healing water and light (Rev. 22:20, KJV).

For some of us the great transformation from the inside out comes gradually. For some of us it comes swiftly. But for all of us it comes inevitably as we unite more closely to the One who brings the yeast, salt, wind, and fire of the new creation – the deep self we have always longed to be.

– Flora Slosson Wuellner
“Transformation: Our Fear, Our Longing”
Weavings: A Journal of the Christian Spiritual Life
March/April 1991
pp. 10-14



See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Thoughts on Transformation (Part 1)
Thoughts on Transformation (Part 2)
Jesus: Path-Blazer of Radical Transformation
In the Garden of Spirituality – Eckhart Tolle
“More Lovely Than the Dawn”: God as Divine Lover
The Challenge to Become Ourselves


Image: Artist unknown.

Quote of the Day

Pope Benedict just can't seem to bring himself to admit how devastating the clerical abuse scandal has been for Catholicism in the West. Nor can he bring himself to face the fact it was far more a product of his own clerical culture than it was society.

. . . There's a part of me that can easily understand why Benedict is having trouble facing up to this scandal. It really does betray the priesthood on a very fundamental level and he has given virtually his entire life to a very idealistic version of the priesthood. This betrayal . . . has to be something like a dagger to his own heart, but the fact is his own history has its moments when he was the one holding that dagger. And that is the problem with the clerical culture. It seems to be able to compel otherwise good men to do very bad things in order to protect the magical/fantastical notions of the priesthood.

– Colleen Kochivar-Baker
Enlightened Catholicism
December 20, 2010



Recommended Off-site Links:
Benedict on Clergy Abuse Situation: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back – William D. Lindsey (Bilgrimage, December 21, 2010).
What Victims Hear in Pope's Talk on Sex Abuse – Thomas P. Doyle (National Catholic Reporter, December 21, 2010).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Real Crisis
Quote of the Day - April 28, 2010
Authentic Catholicism: The Antidote to Clericalism
Now We Know
SNAP Responds to Cardinal Bertone
A Clerical Leadership Unresponsive to Voices of Reason
The Roman Catholic Pyramid is Crumbling
An Offering of Ashes
Eugene Kennedy on Roman Catholicism's "Post-Hierarchical Blues"
Genuine Authority
Beyond Papalism


Photo of the Day



Image: Michael J. Bayly.


See also the previous Wild Reed post:
An Evening Stroll (and Theological Musings)


Tuesday, December 21, 2010

The Trouble with the Male Dancer (Part 2)

The Wild Reed series “The Dancer and the Dance” continues with the second of three excerpts from Ramsey Burt’s book The Male Dancer: Bodies, Spectacle, Sexualities (2007). All three excerpts are from chapter one, “The Trouble with the Male Dancer,” which explores how the spectacle of men dancing can challenge, undermine and/or redefine notions of masculinity.

Today’s excerpt focuses on homophobia and the male dancer, and contains an excellent definition and discussion on homophobia which, as Burt reminds us, is an “essential characteristic of patriarchal society.” Regular visitors may notice that I used part of this excerpt in my previous post on the pope and the troupe of male acrobats that recently entertained him and his court at the Vatican.

____________________________________


Increasingly since the nineteenth century, it has been considered appropriate for men not to appear soft and not to appear emotionally expressive. An individual who does not conform to these behavioural norms, and cannot claim to be a genius, has been in danger of being considered “not to be a proper man,” a euphemistic phrase that generally means homosexual.

The cluster of fears associated with homosexuality is sometimes called homophobia. Homophobia is the social mechanism which prohibits, or makes fearful, the idea of intimate contact or communication with members of the same sex. It is generally argued that homophobia is a mechanism for regulating the behaviour of all men rather than just self-identified homosexuals. Much queer theory assumes that homophobia is an essential characteristic of patriarchal society. Joseph Bristow puts it thus: “homophobia comes into operation so that men can be as close as possible – to work powerfully together in the interests of men – without ever being too (sexually) close to one another. . . . homophobia actually brings men into a close homosocial relation ([“How Men Are,” New Formations, 6, Winter: 119-31] 1988: 128). The mechanisms (including disapproval of male dance) which limit the subversive potential of some representations of masculinity can be seen to serve the purpose of keeping out of sight anything which might disrupt the relations within which men work powerfully together in the interests of men.

Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick argues that, in men’s relationships with other men in contemporary Western society, emotional and sexual expression is necessarily suppressed in the interests of maintaining male power. In a broader historical and anthropological perspective, she argues, this sort of male bonding is atypical: a similar suppression does not occur in female bonding in modern Western society, nor did it exist, for example, for Greek men in the time of Socrates. In the latter examples, there is a continuum between social, political, and sexual expression. Sedgwick argues that male, homosocial relationships in our society are characterised by intense homophobia, fear, and hatred of homosexuality. This repressed homosexual component of male sexuality accounts for “correspondences and similarities between the most sanctioned forms of male homosocial bonding and the most reprobate expressions of male homosexuality” (Sedgwick
1985: 89). Men are in a double bind in that they are drawn to other men, but this acceptable attraction is not clearly distinguishable from forbidden homosexual interest: “For a man to be a man’s man is separated only by an invisible, carefully blurred, always-already crossed line from being ‘interested in men’” (ibid.: 89). What was at stake in Sedgwick’s account is the limit of normative heterosexual masculine identity. Heterosexuality depends on homosexuality in order to define its own limits. There would be nothing straight about heterosexual men if there weren’t homosexual men to define the limit beyond which heterosexuals cannot go. Homosexuals are, thus, essential to the continuation of heterosexuality; as Leo Bersani has put it, homosexuals are “the internally excluded difference that cements heterosexual identity” ([Bersani]1995: 36).

Homophobia doesn’t actually offer an explanation of why modern Western society is prejudiced and discriminates against homosexuals. Homosexual men were subject to sometimes violent discrimination prior to the nineteenth century, at times when performances by leading male ballet dancers were greeted with considerable approval. There is no simple linkage between homosexuality, homophobia, and uneasiness at professional male dancers. The usefulness of the concept of homophobia is, perhaps, strategic. By giving a name to the way social restrictions function that maintain certain norms of masculine behaviour, it is possible to make visible aspects of male experience that are otherwise hidden. It, then, also becomes possible to discuss the way male-male social relations have been represented in theatre dance in terms of homophobia. My argument is that it is these social restrictions that, since the mid-nineteenth century, have caused the display of male dancing to become a source of anxiety.

Male appearance signifies power and success: as John Berger has put it, a man’s appearance tells you what he can do to you or for you. If, however, his appearance is also desirable, he is, from the point of view of a male spectator, drawing attention to the always-already crossed line between homosocial bonding and homosexual sexuality. His appearance, therefore, carries with it, for the male spectator, the threat of revealing the suppressed homosexual component within the links he has with other men and through which he maintains his power and status in patriarchal society. It is the ability of the male ballet dancer to represent the power and status of men in bourgeois society which was proposed by one nineteenth-century writer as being the trouble with the male dancer.



NEXT: Part 3: Homosexuality and the Male Dancer


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Trouble with the Male Dancer (Part 1)
The Dancer and the Dance
The Premise of All Forms of Dance
The Church and Dance
Recovering the Queer Artistic Heritage
Istanbul (Part 4)
Scaling the Heights
Dark Matters
Oh! What’s This, Then?
Whimsical and Edgy
Love, Equality and the Rumba
An Evening with the Yuval Ron Ensemble
Oh, Yeah!
Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake
Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake Returns to New York
The Potential of Art & the Limits of Rigid Orthodoxy to Connect Us to the Sacred


Image 1: Subjects and photographer unknown.
Image 2: Chris Nash.
Image 3: Alan Alberto (photographer unknown).


Monday, December 20, 2010

Photo of the Day


See also the previous Wild Reed post:
Swallows' Ledge

Image: Michael J. Bayly.


Sunday, December 19, 2010

Francis DeBernardo: "The Church is Better Because of the Presence of LGBT People"

Over at the always informative Religion Dispatches, Alex McNeill has an excellent interview with Francis DeBernardo, executive director of New Ways Ministry, a gay-positive ministry of advocacy and justice for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Catholics.

As I’m sure most folks who are reading this would know, New Ways Ministry has recently collaborated with Call to Action, Dignity USA and Fortunate Families to form a new justice-focused coalition called Equally Blessed. One initiative of Equally Blessed is a national campaign that is encouraging Catholics to wear rainbow ribbons to Mass in order to raise awareness about LGBT issues. Of course, such a simple action may mean that one gets denied communion! (As folks in Minnesota know well (see here).

Following is McNeill’s interview with DeBarnado in its entirety.

_________________________________________


Alex McNeill: How has the LGBT movement changed and where do you see it going?

Francis DeBernardo: It has grown. LGBT issues are now in the mainstream of discussion of Catholic organizations and associations. They are no longer ignored. In terms of ministry, the biggest shift has been from Catholics who first encountered LGBT issues from a place of pity and sympathy. I now see that Catholics are recognizing that LGBT people have a lot to bring to the church and that the church needs those gifts. It’s a more optimistic outlook. It’s gone from a pity-party to recognizing that the church is better because of the presence of LGBT people.

In terms of the future of the movement and church, Catholic lay-people are moving in a direction totally opposite from the bishops, and if the bishops do not start to see how the Catholic faith is being manifested, they are going to miss the boat. I believe the Holy Spirit is speaking among the lay people of the church and the bishops who are not discerning that call, and are not listening to that voice, to their detriment.

I think the illogical statements that bishops make about LGBT people and issues cause Catholic people to question bishops’ moral authority, not only on that issue but on other issues as well. We saw with birth control, for example, when the Vatican maintained its ban on artificial birth-control, more and more Catholics started questioning the Bishops on a variety of issues. This issue will further erode the credibility of bishops as speakers on moral and social issues.


Alex McNeill: What is the effect of that on the church as a whole?

Francis DeBarnardo: One very sad thing we’ve seen is people are leaving the church. Ex-Catholics would make up the second largest denomination in this country, if they were a denomination. People who stay in the church are becoming dispirited, and the bishops need to realize how their intransigence affects church life.


Alex McNeill: What have been the results of the "rainbow ribbon" campaign. Any negatives?

Francis DeBarnardo: I’ve only heard stories of support and encouragement. People are supportive of anti-bullying measures. They were moved by the suicide trend this past fall, and agree that the Catholic Church should be responding in a positive way.

The most likely negative consequence is that people might be denied communion for wearing the rainbow ribbon. Two months ago, college students in Minnesota were denied communion when wearing rainbow pins to church. Also, people from another group, the Rainbow Sash Movement, have been denied communion for wearing a rainbow sash on particular days. [In addition, there's the Rainbow Sash Alliance USA and its various actions in Minnesota. See, for instance here, here and here.]


Alex McNeill: How do people feel, wearing the ribbons to church?

Francis DeBarnardo: It’s a scary thing at first. It’s not like wearing any other kind of ribbon because the rainbow stands out and invites more questions. But people have said that they appreciate the fact that it is a conversation-starter. Those who are wearing the ribbons have wanted to start conversations about these issues but didn’t have a comfortable, non-threatening way to bring it up. This is a friendly form of activism. It offers a message of hope and allows people to ask questions. It’s not preachy, but it gets the ball rolling. [For further reflections on how people feel wearing rainbow ribbons, sashes and buttons to church, see The Wild Reed's 3-part series "Take, All of You, and Eat": Communion and the Rainbow Sash.]


Alex McNeill: How did this action come about?

Francis DeBarnardo: It started at a national conference for Call to Action, one of Equally Blessed’s member organizations and a national organization of progressive Catholics. When we launched the campaign only a handful of the 2,000 people in attendance were wearing ribbons, but by the end of the conference almost everyone was wearing them. We’ve been using social media to spread the word, including a video which had over 2,500 hits on YouTube. The video is of a mom speaking to bishops which is a very powerful and hopeful message. One of the things about this campaign is that it is the people are leading the bishops, because the bishops were very quiet on the LGBT suicide trend that happened this fall. Catholic people are taking leadership in a way that the bishops did not.


Alex McNeill: What was the catalyst for the creation of Equally Blessed, and what do you hope to accomplish?

Francis DeBarnardo: Equally Blessed comprises four organizations who represent different contingencies that have been working together for LGBT equality. In the last year and a half, we’ve had many discussions about how the bishops have ramped up their rhetoric against LGBT issues. At the same time we have been recognizing that Catholic lay people are becoming more and more supportive of LGBT issues and people. We wanted to unleash the power of those lay people to make an impact on both the church and society.

One of our goals is to raise awareness among Catholics of the problems that LGBT youth are facing. Sometimes in Catholic conversations, Catholics tend to forget the human realities that LGBT youth face. Catholics can focus too much on sex and forget that being an LGBT youth often means struggling with self-acceptance and self-esteem and feeling marginalized and ostracized. These are the much more important issues [than sex] and require a Gospel reaction and response of acceptance.


Alex McNeill: At what levels do you think the conversations will take place, and have you seen it work before?

Francis DeBarnardo: We think conversations will start at the personal level, but we hope they will move towards structural changes. For example, Catholic schools should all have anti-bullying policies and programs in place. The schools could establish safe-space programs on their campuses. [The organization I serve as executive coordinator, the Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities, has played a leading role in developing "safe school" curriculum for Catholic high schools. See, for instance, here, here, here and here.] Diocese can implement anti-discrimination policies in hiring and employment practices.

Bishop Thomas Gumbleton was once asked, “How can we get more supportive bishops like you?” He said, “tell them to find and talk to the gay and lesbian members in their own families.” He was stating a truth that this is an issue where personal conversations and personal experience can change hearts and minds. Sexuality is a vulnerable part of our make-up. When we start to discuss it in human terms with other people and hear other people’s perspective, it is easier to change hearts and minds and then change policies from there.


Alex McNeill: What are the biggest obstacles in the way of policy change in the Catholic church?

Francis DeBarnardo: With LGBT issues, the greatest obstacle is silence, though the obstacles run the gamut from silence to violence. By breaking the silence, even in small ways, we are planting the seeds of change.


Alex McNeill: What's next?

Francis DeBarnardo: The ultimate goal is to have a Catholic church that accepts and respects all of its members. LGBT people and youth are definitely a part of the membership of the Catholic church, and ultimately we want a church where all will be welcome. We want a church that offers hope, not condemnation.


Alex McNeill: Are there any groups doing similar work, or working against LGBT people? How is that playing out?

Francis DeBarnado: There are other groups working on LGBT issues: Catholic Association for Lesbian and Gay Ministry is a national organization of people who minister in the Catholic Church to LGBT people. A new group called Catholics for Equality works on legislative issues. [There are also numerous locally-based groups, including the Holy Families Committee of the St Louis-based Catholic Action Network for Social Justice and the aforementioned Twin Cities-based Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities.
In addition, there is a growing number of Catholic LGBT blogs, including The Open Tabernacle, Bilgrimage, Queering the Church, Enlightened Catholicism, Gay Mystic, Ad Dominum, the Gay Catholic Forum, and the blogs of John McNeill, Joseph O'Leary and Geoff Farrow.]

The National Organization for Marriage, which is not explicitly Catholic but has a lot of Catholic members, is the biggest one against the grain. [See Religion Dispatches coverage of a recent debate between Andrew Sullivan and NOM's Maggie Gallagher.] Another group called Courage is a ministry group that supports celibacy for lesbian and gay people, and would not support any changes to Church practice or policy. They aren’t waging an anti-rainbow ribbon campaign, but they offer reparative therapy and encourage people to remain celibate or to change their orientation. [Actually, the Courage apostolate doesn't actually offer reparative therapy, but neither does it discourage people from pursuing such "therapy" elsewhere. Also, it has close connections to the discredited National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), an organization of “therapists” that teaches that homosexuality is a disorder not only chosen, but changeable through effort and therapy. See here, here, here, here and here.]

The Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights often speaks out against any progressive groups but mostly targets the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. We would love to have something even as tame as an open dialogue with them. They are one of the strongest Catholic influences on LGBT issues right now, and we are trying to be equally strong . . . as well as equally blessed.


Alex McNeill: What would you say to queer Catholic folk who feel disgruntled with the Catholic church?

Francis DeBarnardo: I would say that the church is yours. You are the church. The church is not just the bishops and the hierarchy, but it is all of the people of God. If the church is a place that gives you life, then you should stay and work to make it a more inclusive place for all people. The other thing I would say is: You are not alone. There are tons of people out here who support you and who welcome you and who want you as full members of the church. [In the local church of St. Paul-Minneapolis, such Catholics have come together to form the Catholic Coalition for Church Reform. For more about CCCR and its successful Synod of the Baptized, see here, here, here, here and here.]


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
LGBT Catholics Celebrate Being “Wonderfully Made”
The Raising of Lazarus and the Gay Experience of Coming Out
A Message to NOM (and the Catholic Hierarchy)
A Catholic Statement of Support for Same-Sex Marriage
At the Cathedral of St. Paul, Rainbow Dashes and a Circle of Love
300+ People Vigil at the Cathedral in Solidarity with LGBT Catholics
At UST, a Rousing and Very Catholic Show of Support for Same-Sex Marriage
250+ People Attend Catholic LGBT Pride Prayer Service in Minneapolis
Celebrating Our Sanctifying Truth
The Catholic Church and Gays: An Excellent Overview
Catholic Church Can Overcome Fear of Gay People
To Whom the Future of the Catholic Church Belongs
How Times Have Changed
CPCSM and the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis (Part 1)
CPCSM and the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis (Part 2)
CPCSM and the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis (Part 3)
CPCSM and the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis (Part 4)
The Pope’s “Scandalous” Stance on Homosexuality
Daniel Maguire: “Heterosexism, Not Homosexuality, is the Problem
Knowing What to Do, Knowing Why to Stay
Getting It Right

Recommended Off-site Link:
NOM Exposed


Photo of the Day


Image: Michael J. Bayly.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Quote of the Day

It is time to close this chapter in our history. It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed.


– President Barack Obama
Quoted in Anne Flaherty’s article,
Senate Votes to End Ban on Openly Gay Troops
Associated Press
December 18, 2010



Recommended Off-site Links:
”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Repeal Passes Senate 65-31 – Elise Foley (The Huffington Post, December 18, 2010).
Admiral Mike Mullen: “We Will Be a Better Military Without ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’” – Michael A. Jones (GayRights.org, December 18, 2010).
In DADT's Wake: A New Chance to Serve - Ron Hill (FrumForum.com, December 18, 2010).
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell": How It Was Repealed – Linda Hirshman (The Daily Beast, December 18, 2010).
Gays Celebrate Repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" – Verena Dobnik (Associated Press, December 18, 2010).
The History of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Repeal, in a Nutshell – Evan Hurst (TruthWinsOut.org, December 18, 2010).

UPDATES: Next Steps for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" – Alexandra Zavis (Los Angeles Times, December 20, 2010).
Soldiers Mixed on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Repeal National Public Radio (December 20, 2010.
Anti-Gay Group Declares War on DADT Repeal – Neal Broverman (The Advocate, December 20, 2010).
Re-Enlistment Choice Looms for Discharged Gay Veterans – Liz Goodwin (The Lookout, December 20, 2020).
The Ghost is Slain – Wayne Besen (TruthWinsOut.org, December 21, 2010).
Religious Right Lays Out Plan to Punish Senators Who Voted for DADT Repeal – Kyle (Alternet.org, December 21, 2010).
To the Gay Community: Now That You Can Join the Military, Please Don’t! – Medea Benjamin (CommonDreams.org, December 21, 2010).
Obama Signs "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Repeal – Pauline Jelinek (Associated Press, December 22, 2010).

See also the previous Wild Reed post:
Two Very Different Perspectives on the Military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy


The Wild Reed's Year in Review

.
Part 2: April – June 2010

Following is a further selection of 2010 Wild Reed posts that I particularly enjoyed putting together. Many of these posts have also generated the most comments from readers.

If you’ve yet to read these posts then I hope you'll take the time to do so. I also hope that the experiences and insights they convey will, in some way, resonate with you and encourage and inspire you on your journey.


_______________________________


April 2010

One Overwhelming Fire of Love (Part 4 of The Wild Reed's 2010 Holy Week series featuring excerpts from Andrew Harvey’s book, Son of Man: The Mystical Path to Christ)

The Most Dangerous Kind of Rebel (Part 5 of The Wild Reed's 2010 Holy Week series)

Resurrection: Beyond Words, Dogmas, and All Possible Theological Formulations (Part 6 of The Wild Reed's 2010 Holy Week series)

Blaming the Gays

The Cosmic Christ: Brother, Lover, Friend, Divine and Tender Guide (Part 7 of The Wild Reed's 2010 Holy Week series)

Bill Donohue's "Blame the Gays" Tactic Refuted by John Jay Study Researcher

Remembering Oscar Romero

The Wounded and Risen Christ

A Clerical Leadership Unresponsive to Voices of Reason

Let's Face It: The Catholic Church is a Gay Institution . . . and That's a Good Thing!

At UTS, a Rousing and Very Catholic Display of Support for Marriage Equality

A Message of Hope (and a Call to Action) from the Land Down-Under

Rockin' with Maxwell

Part 3 of The Wild Reed series celebrating the city of Istanbul

Archbishop Nienstedt Calls (Again) for a Marriage Amendment to Minnesota's Constitution



May 2010

Uproar on the Streets of Minneapolis (Part 1)

Uproar on the Streets of Minneapolis (Part 2)

Part 8 of The Wild Reed series The Journal of James Curtis

Thanks, Mum!

Dale Carpenter on the "Win-Win"Reality of Gay Marriage

Sister Jeannine Gramick Asks: "Who Speaks for Catholics?"

Revisiting Dirk Bogarde

The Spirit of Pentecost is Very Much Present and Active in the Church of Minneapolis/St. Paul



June 2010

The Scourge of Homophobia in Economically Impoverished Countries

The Fizzer Finale of Lost Brings to Mind the Unraveling of Twin Peaks

"Homodevotion" to the Body of Christ

Standing Strong (Part 1 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

Jesus Was a Sissy

Notes from the "Laughable but Tragic" World of Courage

Growing Strong (Part 2 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

Jesus and Homosexuality (Part 3 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

It Is Not Good to Be Alone (Part 4 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

A Scientific Look at Vampire Mythology

The Bisexual: "Living Consciously and Continually in the Place Where the Twain Meet" (Part 5 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

LGBT Catholics Celebrate Being "Wonderfully Made"

Spirituality and the Gay Experience (Part 6 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

Recovering the Queer Artistic Heritage (Part 7 of The Wild Reed's special “Gay Pride 2010” series)

A Catholic Presence at Gay Pride



NEXT: Part 3: July - September 2010


See also the previous post:
The Wild Reed's Year in Review: January – March 2010


Thursday, December 16, 2010

Thoughts on Transformation (Part 2)

Continuing with The Wild Reed’s 2010 Advent series, I share today excepts from Flora Slosson Wuellner’s contribution to the March/April 1991 issue of Weavings: A Journal of the Christian Spiritual Life. This particular issue focuses on transformation, and Flora’s contribution is an insightful reflection entitled “Transformation: Our Fear, Our Longing.”

_______________________________


We are surrounded, overwhelmed, battered, swept along by outer change. The inner self adapts, adjusts, survives, but too often does not undergo any deep transformation. We have reacted rather than acted.

There are many forms of both spirituality and relationship which anesthetize our sense of powerlessness. Sometimes we are tempted to join a faith or enter a relationship which invites us to surrender our identity, to relinquish our freedom and responsibility of choice, and to merge ourselves with the identity of others. Sometimes, on the other hand, we are invited into spiritualities or relationships in which we are offered total control. We are taught methods of manipulative power over everything and everybody.

These extremes and their various adaptations do not enable us to face the deep challenge of change: “While all events and persons around me change, am I able to change with power from my center rather than be swept along helplessly?”

This is the great, grave distinction between change and transformation. Change refers to adaptation, reaction, without necessarily involving newness of being. Transformation involves much more than mere adaptation to outer manipulation. Transformation implies new being, a new creative energy flowing from the center which acts with creative power upon surrounding events.

When Jesus spoke of the kingdom of God, he used many symbols of transformation: growing plants, the action of the yeast within the dough, marriage, the act of birth, the action of fire, light, and wind. When Paul spoke of our rebirth in Christ, he spoke of the transformation as a new creation: “If anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation: everything old has passed away; see, everything has become new” (2 Cor. 5:17, NRSV).

This is what is offered by God through Christ: transformation, new creation rather than change, growing from our deep center, expanding our empowered freedom even in the midst of the power of outer events. When our inner selves waken, stretch, stand up, move out, make choices, our terror of change becomes the hunger, thirst, and ecstasy of growing . . . [and we see] the process of transformation no longer as overwhelming assault from the outside, but as ecstatic (though often painful) unfolding from within.

God’s promise of transformation is not a demand: “Clean up your act . . . pull yourself together . . . I want to see your room spotless from now on . . . You’d better produce a decent report card . . .” God’s promise is the ecstatic invitation of lover to beloved: “Come, join yourself to me, and from our togetherness there will come forth the new creation!”

– Flora Slosson Wuellner
“Transformation: Our Fear, Our Longing”
Weavings: A Journal of the Christian Spiritual Life
March/April 1991
pp. 8-9



See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Thoughts on Transformation (Part 1)
Jesus: Path-Blazer of Radical Transformation
In the Garden of Spirituality – Eckhart Tolle


Image: "Transformation" by Ali Miner.

No, Really . . .

I have to say that watching the pope watch a troupe of beautiful, half-naked male acrobats perform yesterday at the Vatican (see video below) brought to mind the following insights from Ramsay Burt’s book The Male Dancer: Bodies, Spectacle, Sexualities (2007).


Male appearance signifies power and success. . . . [A] man’s appearance tells you what he can do to you or for you. If, however, his appearance is also desirable, he is, from the point of view of a male spectator, drawing attention to the always-already crossed line between homosocial bonding and homosexual sexuality. His appearance, therefore, carries with it, for the male spectator, the threat of revealing the suppressed homosexual component within the links he has with other men and through which he maintains his power and status in patriarchal society.






See also the previous Wild Reed posts:

Officially Homophobic, Intensely Homoerotic
Let’s Face It: The Catholic Church is a Gay Institution
A Fact That Should Be Neither Surprising Nor Derogatory
Benedict and Georg
Keeping All the Queens Under the One Roof
Oh, Give It a Rest, Papa!
The Inherent Sensuality of Catholicism
Homosexuality and the Priesthood
The Allure of St. Sebastian
“From Byzantine Daddy to Baroque Twink”: Charles Darwent on the Journey of St. Sebastian
The Archangel Michael as Gay Icon
Weakland, the Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal and Homophobia
A Humorous Look at Internalized Homophobia
A Catholic’s Prayer for His Fellow Pilgrim, Benedict XVI
And a Merry Christmas to You Too, Papa
Catholic Church Can Overcome Fear of Homosexuality