Friday, November 20, 2015

Something to Think About . . .





Related Off-site Links:
Jamar Clark: Tension Rises After Killing of Unarmed Minneapolis Man – Elizabeth Chuck (NBC News, November 19, 2015).
"We Do Want Justice," Says Sister of Unarmed Black Man Killed by Minneapolis Police – Matt Pearce (Los Angeles Times, November 18, 2015).
The Hard Truth of the Minneapolis Black Lives Matter Protests: Communities of Color Have No Trust in Their Police Force – Jana Kooren (American Civil Liberties Union, November 19, 2015).
Minneapolis Shooting Officers Identified As Protests RageHuffPost Black Voices (November 18, 2015).
Minneapolis Lacks Political Will to Provide Security for All – Marjaan Sirdar (Twin Cities Daily Planet, November 19, 2015).
Rep. Keith Ellison at 4th Precinct: "It's Our Constitutional Right to Be Here" – Maury Glover (KMSP News, November 19, 2015).
13 Things You See At A Minneapolis Black Lives Matter Protest – Abrara Rageh (BuzzFeed, November 19, 2015).
Police and Protesters Clash in Minneapolis Over Fatal Shooting of Black Man – Mitch Smith (New York Times, November 19, 2015).




Above: Jeremiah Ellison, son of U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, holds his hands in the air as a police officer points a rifle toward him. Ellison was one of a group of protesters who congregated November 18 outside Minneapolis' 4th Precinct police station, near where Jamar Clark was killed by officers on Sunday. Tweeted Rep. Keith Ellison: "Photo is agonizing for me to see. My son is PEACEFULLY protesting w/ hands up; officer is shouldering gun. Why?" For more on this incident, click here. (Photo: Wintana Melekin)


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
In Minneapolis, Rallying in Solidarity with Black Lives in Baltimore
At the Mall of America Today, a Necessary Disruption to "Business as Usual"
Rallying in Solidarity with Eric Garner and Other Victims of Police Brutality
Quote of the Day – June 19, 2015
"Say Her Name" Solidarity Action for Sandra Bland


Thursday, November 19, 2015

In the Wake of the Paris Attacks, Saying 'No' to War, Racism and Islamophobia


Yesterday afternoon I joined with around 25 others in braving the cold and rain to attend the weekly peace vigil on the Lake St./Marshall Ave. Bridge. I made the sign I'm holding in the photo above especially for yesterday's vigil, the first to take place after the horrific November 13 terrorist attacks in Paris which claimed 128 lives. Accordingly, yesterday's peace vigil was entitled "Say No to War, Racism and Islamophobia: Don't Let Paris Be An Excuse for More War."

My sign's message was inspired by the words of Phyllis Bennis (right), director of the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies and a political and social analyst for whom I have great respect. She was recently on Lawrence O'Donnell's MSNBC show The Last Word, where she talked about the need to understand the lessons of the failure of 15 years of war to deal with terrorism. "Wars of vengeance won't work for France anymore than they worked for the US [after 9/11]" said Bennis. "Terrorism survives war, people don't."

This sentiment is echoed in an open letter from four former U.S. Air Force drone operators to President Obama, in which it's said that civilian killings by drone strikes are driving terrorism and instability. The U.S. drone program, write the Air Force whistleblowers, "is one of the most devastating driving forces for terrorism and destabilization around the world."

"We came to the realization that the innocent civilians we were killing only fueled the feelings of hatred that ignited terrorism and groups like ISIS," the whistleblowers wrote, "while also serving as a fundamental recruitment tool similar to Guantanamo Bay."

(Note: In September, some friends and I traveled from the Twin Cities to Little Falls, Minnesota where we joined with 30 others outside the gates of Camp Ripley to protest the U.S. military's use of weaponized drones. For commentary and images of this event, click here.)




Above: My friend Marie Braun, longtime justice and peace activist and member of the Twin Cities based Women Against Military Madness (WAMM). For over 15 years, Marie and her husband John have been the key organizers of the weekly peace vigil on the Lake St./Marshall Ave. Bridge, which spans the Mississippi River and links the cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul.

In their promotional material for yesterday's vigil, WAMM and the Twin Cities Peace Campaign noted the following:

At this time, following the tragic events in Paris, we must work to ensure that these events do not result in a growing U.S. military presence in the Middle East and/or an increase in racism and Islamophobia.

U.S. and western powers have been at war in the Middle East for years, not in the interests of the people of the region, but rather to control their resources.

Endless war breeds endless terrorism. Cruise missiles, boots on the ground, air strikes, and other well financed political and economic meddling are the rich man's form of war. Terrorism is a response.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter has now said, “As NATO allies, as leaders of the counter-ISIL coalition, as nations working shoulder to shoulder from West Africa to the Indian Ocean, the United States and France will only strengthen our resolve.” This statement sounds ominous – like Washington is seizing this opportunity to convince us of the necessity of waging endless war throughout the world.



Above: My friend Steve, a stalwart participant in the weekly peace vigil on the Lake St./Marshall Ave. Bridge.



Above: My friend Brigid McDonald, CSJ at yesterday's peace vigil.

Brigid's sign reminds me of Peter Certo's excellent article "Military Intervention Is the Problem, Not the Solution." Following is an excerpt.

[Y]ou can’t simply bomb extremism out of existence. And as governments from Moscow to Paris to Beirut are learning, you put your own people’s lives on the line when you try.

Military intervention has succeeded mightily in breaking things and killing people, but it’s done nothing to wind down the greatest factor fueling the rise of ISIS: Syria’s wider civil war. An international arms embargo and a deal between the Syrian regime and other rebel groups — jobs for diplomats, not drones — would go much further toward curtailing the threat of ISIS.

Yet France has responded to the carnage in Paris by pounding Raqqa with yet more air strikes — reportedly bombing medical clinics, a museum, and a stadium of its own, among other targets.

Leading U.S. presidential candidates aren’t proposing anything smarter.

Hillary Clinton declared that ISIS “must be destroyed” with “all of the tools at our disposal.” Ted Cruz called for “overwhelming air power” and condemned the Obama administration for having insufficient “tolerance for civilian casualties.” Ben Carson called for “boots on the ground,” while Donald Trump swore he’d “bomb the s— out of” ISIS-controlled oil fields and hand them over to ExxonMobil.

Virtually all GOP contenders, along with a gaggle of Republican governors, agreed that they’d close the door to Syrian refugees, too — as though they can evade the consequences of war by making life more miserable for the innocent people fleeing it.

None of this bravado makes me feel safer here in Washington, where ISIS threatened more Paris-style bloodshed in a recent video. When I imagine those cold-blooded killers running roughshod through the bars, restaurants, and concert halls my neighbors and I frequent, my stomach drops.

But that’s the lesson, isn’t it: When your government answers every problem in the world with military force, war begets war. And eventually there’s nowhere left to hide from it.

– Peter Certo
Excerpted from "Military Intervention Is the Problem, Not the Solution"
Common Dreams
November 17, 2015




Above: My friend Carol took this photo of me (while my friend Steve snapped the opening image). I have to say that by the end of the hour-long vigil my sign was rather worse for wear, what with the constant misty rainfall. I was rather wet-through too! Still, it felt right to be part of this vigil and to spread its overall message to the rush-hour commuters passing by.

It's an "overall message" that is summed up in the title of Vincent Warren's recent online article: "War is Not the Answer." I close with an excerpt from this well-written and insightful article.

We have been down this road before, and we already know that military responses, restrictions of democratic rights, and hostility and discrimination against Muslims do not stop terrorism. Rather, they provide the perfect breeding ground for terrorism. Indeed, the bitterest of ironies is that the Paris and Beirut attacks by ISIS are, in some respects, the fruit of the U.S.’s response to 9/11, including the disastrous Iraq war.

I have written about this before. On the 10th anniversary of 9/11, I reflected on how the U.S. militaristic response to the attacks did more to erode our core democratic principles than it did to keep us safe. The most painful political truth, I observed, about the decade (now decade and a half) following 9/11 is that it represents a severe undoing of our democracy such that the values which defined us before that date may never be regained.

Everything about the aftermath of 9/11 counsels us to avoid seeking vengeance through wanton military responses abroad and militarized policies at home. Our experience has shown that sending troops, drones, and missiles to wage war on terrorist groups in the end only strengthens the resolve of those groups at the same time that it weakens the resolve domestically to be at war with the world. It is a strategy that simply cannot be successful.

Military responses are incompatible with the values of democracy. Sending troops means bringing home body bags. Dropping bombs means killing civilians, and ultimately far more civilians than military targets. Waging war means creating desperate refugee populations with no safe place to go.

Domestically the very construction of the concept of “terrorism” is one that is easily manipulated by the government to enhance and abuse its power. The U.S. “War on Terror” has led to a host of secret government actions, mass surveillance, targeted surveillance of Muslim communities and progressive groups, immigration abuses, and let’s not forget indefinite detention without charge or trial and the systemic use of torture. Along with these, it has also led to the jailing and teargassing of protesters, and cracking down on people who disagree with any or all of the above actions as well as journalists that try to expose them.

“The biggest danger terrorism poses to our society comes not from the direct harm inflicted,” Paul Krugman wrote on Monday, “but from the wrong-headed responses it can inspire.” The world we live in today is a testament to the truth of this statement, as are the current actions of the French and U.S. governments.

– Vincent Warren
Excerpted from "War Is Not the Answer
Center for Constitutional Rights
November 18, 2015


Related Off-site Links:
After the Paris Attacks, A Call for Justice – Not Vengeance – Phyllis Bennis (The Nation, November 14, 2015).
Former Drone Pilots to Obama: Civilian Killings Driving "Terrorism, Instability" – Lauren McCauley (Common Dreams, November 18, 2015).
Hysterical Corporate Media Fueling War Fervor, Xenophobia in 24/7 Cycle – Deirdre Fulton (Common Dreams, November 18, 2015).
The Paris Tragedy and the End of Strategic Thinking – Peter Isackson (Fair Observer, November 17, 2015).
Stock Prices of Weapons Manufacturers Soaring Since Paris Attack – Glenn Greenwald (The Intercept, November 16, 2015).
In UK, Corbyn Warns Against Cycle of War That Brings "More Mayhem . . . More Loss" – Nadia Prupis (Common Dreams, November 16, 2015).
"Shock ... Awe": The Aftermath of Paris – Robert C. Koehler (Common Dreams, November 19, 2015).
Six Steps Short of War to Beat ISIS – Phyllis Bennis (Foreign Policy in Focus, September 10, 2014).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Vigiling Against Weaponized Drones
Rallying in Solidarity with the Refugees of Syria and the World
Everywhere
Something to Think About – November 17, 2015


Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Something to Think About . . .


Source


Related Off-site Links:
Pope Francis: "Jesus Was A Refugee" – Yasmine Hafiz (HuffPost Religion, November 17, 2015).
Welcoming Jesus Home: A Christian Response to the Refugee Crisis – Trudy Smith (HuffPost Religion, September 15, 2015).
Refugee Crisis: Why the Bible Doesn't Allow Us to Turn Our Backs on Drowning Children – Mark Woods (Christian Today, September 3, 2015).
Christian Politicians Won’t Say It, But the Bible is Clear: Let the Refugees In, Every Last One – Giles Fraser (The Guardian, September 4, 2015).
Jesus Would Welcome Syrian Refugees – Laura Turner (Religion News Service, November 16, 2015).
No, State Governors Can't Refuse to Accept Syrian Refugees – Ian Millhiser (Think Progress, November 16, 2015).
Obama Chides Anti-Refugee Politicians for Being "Scared of Widows and 3-Year-Old Orphans" – Hasani Gittens (NBC News, November 17, 2015).
Elizabeth Warren Delivers Stinging Critique of Efforts to Reject Syrian Refugees – Laura Barron-Lopez (HuffPost Politics, November 17, 2015).
American Bigots Also Opposed Taking in Jewish Refugees During the Holocaust, and Millions Died – Stephen D Foster Jr. (AddictingInfo.org, November 17, 2015).
ISIS Wants You to Hate Refugees – Adam Taylor (The Washington Post, November 16, 2015).
If the Paris Attacks Make You Hate Muslim Refugees, ISIS Wins – Jake Horowitz (PolicyMic, November 17, 2015).
French President, Unlike the Republican Party, Refuses to Appease ISIS and Will Take 30,000 Refugees – Barbara Morrill (Daily Kos, November 18, 2015).
Police Believe Paris Attackers Used Forged Passports to Stigmatize RefugeesCTV Montreal (November 17, 2015).
Leaders Urged to Resist Fear-Based Call to Build "Fortress Europe" as Response to Paris Attacks – Sarah Lazare (Common Dreams, November 17, 2015).
All Paris Attackers Identified So Far Are European Nationals, According To Top EU Official – Justin Salhani (Think Progress, November 16, 2015).




See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Rallying in Solidarity with the Refugees of Syria and the World
Everywhere
Something to Think About – January 11, 2015
Something to Think About – December 25, 2012

Image 1: "Do Refugees Need to Be Christian?" by Tom Toles (The Washington Post, November 18, 2015).
Image 2: Getty Images.
Image 3: Asylum seekers and migrants descend from a large fishing vessel used to transport them from Turkey to the Greek island of Lesbos. October 11, 2015. (Zalmaï for Human Rights Watch)


Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Quote of the Day

After 11 years of prayer and careful discernment, I experienced a moment of clarity in 2013. My primary vocation in this life is a simple one: to be a living witness to a gay life lived in Jesus Christ – and to carry that witness to the church and to the LGBT community. . . . Whatever injustice I faced at the hands of church leaders, I had an early awareness that God was prepared to use this experience in a powerful and life-giving way.

– Sam Albano
Quoted in Bob Shine's article,
"Church Workers Speak Out,
Backed by 1,000+ Catholics
at Call To Action Meeting
"
Bondings 2.0
November 17, 2015


Related Off-site Links:
That All Might Hear the Gospel and Live – Sam Albano (National Catholic Reporter, February 25, 2015).
CTA Calls for Solidarity to Support Church Worker Justice – Tom Boswell (National Catholic Reporter, November 16, 2015).
In Case You Have Not Yet Heard My Story – William D. Lindsey (Bilgrimage, October 13, 2015).
Catholic Schools Must Refuse to Fire LGBT Employees – Jamie Manson (National Catholic Reporter, July 29, 2015).
Catholicism, Employment, & LGBT Issues – New Ways Ministry (Bondings 2.0, 2015).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
When Expulsion is the Cost of Discipleship
Truth-Telling: The Greatest of Sins in a Dysfunctional Church
Thoughts on the Firing of Kristen Ostendorf
Church Fires "Openly" Gay Music Director Charles Philyaw
Thoughts on Authority and Fidelity
Our Catholic "Stonewall Moment"
What It Means to Be Catholic
Celebrating Our Sanctifying Truth
Sons of the Church: The Witnessing of Gay Catholic Men – A Discussion Guide
LGBT Catholics Celebrate Being "Wonderfully Made"

Image: Dreamstime (via National Catholic Reporter).


Everywhere

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Happy Birthday, Petula!

It's the 83rd birthday today of Petula Clark, the English singer, actress and composer whose career has spanned seven decades. . . . And who's still going strong, as evidenced by her sublime 2013 album Lost in You, which I've previously highlighted at The Wild Reed.

In celebration of Petula's birthday, I share "Cut Copy Me," the opening track from Lost in You, courtesy of Mr. Jirayuth's Channel and YouTube. In his insightful review of Lost in You, Steven Rosen notes that "Cut Copy Me" is "startlingly effective . . . haunting and mysterious."

So without further ado, here it is! Enjoy . . . and Happy Birthday, Pet!




I breathe you in when you are near
I hide my coyness and fear
Don't let the light grow dim
It's just you and I in the moonlight air

Cut copy me I'm all yours
You're the shoreline I see when I'm off course
I want you to hold me forever, make it last
Forget the others from my past

I seek you in the depths of the night
Like a beacon of light you guide my fright
I promise to give you the sweetest sleep
And my shoulder is yours when you weep

Cut copy me I'm all yours
You're the shoreline I see when I'm off course
I want you to hold me forever, make it last
Forget the others from my past


You may recall that in May of 2014 my parents saw Petula Clark in concert in Port Macquarie, Australia. For my mum's review of this concert, click here.


For more of Petula Clark at The Wild Reed, see:
Pet Sounds
Well, Look Who's Coming to Port Macquarie . . .
Petula Clark: Still Colouring Our World


Saturday, November 14, 2015

"It Is Not Paris We Should Pray For. It Is the World"

The following reflection by Delhi-based Indian blogger Karuna Ezara Parikh was shared earlier today by my friend Patty via Facebook.

It is not Paris we should pray for. It is the world.

It is a world in which Beirut, reeling from bombings two days before Paris, is not covered in the press.

A world in which a bomb goes off at a funeral in Baghdad and not one person's status update says "Baghdad," because not one white person died in that fire.

Pray for the world that blames a refugee crisis for a terrorist attack. That does not pause to differentiate between the attacker and the person running from the very same thing you are.

Pray for a world where people walking across countries for months, their only belongings upon their backs, are told they have no place to go.

Say a prayer for Paris, by all means, but pray more for the world that does not have a prayer for those who no longer have a home to defend. For a world that is falling apart in all corners, and not simply in the towns and cafes we find familiar.



Related Off-site Links:
Poem Urging Prayers for World, Not Just Paris, Strikes A Chord – Ron Dicker (The World Post, November 15, 2015).
Paris Attacks Highlight Western Vulnerability, and Our Selective Grief and Outrage – Chris Graham (New Matilda, November 14, 2015).
Let's Pray for Beirut the Same Way We're Praying for Paris – Elyane Youssef (Elephant Journal, November 14, 2015).
Media Turn Civilian ISIS Victims in Beirut Into Hezbollah Human Shields – Ben Norton (FAIR via Common Dreams, November 14, 2015).
Paris Terror Attacks: France Now Faces Fight Against Fear and Exclusion – Aurelien Mondon (The Conversation via Common Dreams, November 14, 2015).
Paris: You Don’t Want to Read This – Peter Van Buren (Common Dreams, November 15, 2015).
There Is Only One Way to Defeat ISIS – Charles P. Pierce (Esquire, November 14, 2015).
What I Discovered From Interviewing Imprisoned ISIS Fighters – Lydia Wilson (The Nation, October 21, 2015).
 To Defeat ISIS, We Must Call Both Western and Muslim Leaders to Account – Laila Lalami (The Nation, November 15, 2015).
The Age of Despair: Reaping the Whirlwind of Western Support for Extremist Violence – Chris Floyd (Counter Punch, November 13, 2015).
You Can't Understand ISIS If You Don't Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia – Alastair Crooke (The World Post, August 27, 2014).
Muslim Scholars Release Open Letter to ISIS Meticulously Blasting Its Ideology – Lauren Markoe (Religion News Service via HuffPost Religion, September 25, 2014).
Muslims Around the World Speak Out Against Terrorist Attacks in Paris – Nash Jenkins (Time, November 14, 2015).
No, Israel, You Are Not Paris – Michael Greenberger (Forward, November 16, 2015).
Terrorist Attacks in Paris: Can Tragedy Bring Change? – Diana Johnstone (Counter Punch, November 16, 2015).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Let's Also Honor the "Expendables"
Thoughts on Prayer in a "Summer of Strife"


Thursday, November 12, 2015

Quote of the Day

It's never the right time to make waves or apply pressure, in the minds of some Catholics. The change is always tantalizingly on the horizon and we are always advised to keep our eyes on that tantalizing horizon where, we're told over and over, change will eventually show itself.

Meanwhile, nothing at all changes.

Meanwhile, people who speak out are vilified even by members of their own community within the Catholic church.

These dysfunctional dynamics, which depend on belief in an illusionary good father who will one day treat us kindly, are very wearisome to me.

William D. Lindsey
in response to certain sentiments expressed in Anthony Faiola's article,
Not All Gay Catholics Are Pleased About How
Vatican Priest Came Out of the Closet

The Washington Post
November 11, 2015


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
"I Am a Happy and Proud Gay Priest"
Truth-Telling: The Greatest of Sins in a Dysfunctional Church
When Expulsion is the Cost of Discipleship
James Alison on the Likely "Really Big Deal" of Synod 2015
Vatican Stance on Gay Priests Signals Urgent Need for Renewal and Reform


Wednesday, November 11, 2015

On Armistice Day, Remembering Edward Brittain and Geoffrey Thurlow



The film from the past year that I find myself most frequently recommending is James Kent's Testament of Youth.

Based on the World War One memoir of Vera Brittain, Testament of Youth is a superbly-acted story of love, loss and fortitude told cinematically in an incredibly moving and beautiful way.

The film has received universal praise. In his review for The Observer, for instance, Rex Reed writes the following.

Handsomely mounted, skillfully acted, exquisitely photographed and genuinely touching, Testament of Youth is one of those rare film experiences that is just about perfect. An unforgettable mosaic of World War I, it is based on the best-selling memoir published in 1933 by feminist author Vera Brittain, a nurse on the front lines who counted her fiancé, her beloved brother and all of their friends among the casualties.





When I saw Testament of Youth this past summer, I sensed that the film implies that Vera's brother Edward Brittain (played by Taron Egerton) was gay. Indeed, one of the most moving scenes of the film is when Vera reads to her wounded brother a letter he has been carrying with him for months from his friend and fellow soldier Geoffrey Thurlow (Jonathan Bailey). I think viewers attuned to the emotional undercurrents of the film, and of this scene in particular, would readily conclude that Edward and Geoffrey are more than just friends.

And sure enough, a recently-released book by historian Mark Bostridge suggests that Edward's homosexuality, or rather his fears that he was about to be outed, directly lead to his tragic death. After all, homosexuality at that time was considered a crime, and Edward's military supervisors had intercepted one of his letters to another officer which made clear that the two men were in a gay relationship. Bostridge's research leads him to believe that Brittain purposely put himself in the line of enemy fire in order to avoid embarrassing his family by being outed as homosexual and consequently court-martialed and sent to prison.

This Armistice Day, in remembrance of Edward and Geoffrey, and indeed all people who have been subjected to fear, discrimination and unnecessary danger and death in times of war due to their sexual orientation, I share (with added images and links) Nigil Jones' Daily Mail article about Mark Bostridge's findings regarding Edward Brittain's sexuality and its connection to his death.

___________________________


Testament of Tortured Youth


By Nigil Jones
Daily Mail
December 20, 2014


Vera Brittain's heartbreaking WWI memoir of love and loss is now a major movie. But here's what it WON'T show – her 'hero' brother's suicide dash into the guns to keep his gay affair secret.

It was an instant bestseller, a compelling portrayal of the Great War which helped change British life for ever. Vera Brittain’s Testament Of Youth became a lodestone for a bereaved generation determined that such a massacre should never happen again.

The memoir, suffused with loss, tells how the slaughter successively stole Vera’s fiance, her best friends and finally her younger brother Edward [left]. Yet there is one overpowering sadness that does not appear in either Vera’s book or in a new blockbuster film based on it – and which until now has never been revealed. And that is the story of what truly became of her beloved brother, a decorated hero, on the Western Front.

For aside from the appalling privations of the trenches, Edward Brittain MC also carried a very private burden, according to a new biography of Vera: the dangerous secret that Edward was homosexual – which was at the time illegal – that he had been found out, and that he faced the imminent prospect of court martial and imprisonment.

To add to his shame, Edward – an officer – had been conducting affairs with ordinary soldiers; men, in other words, from a lower social class. The discovery was made by author and historian Mark Bostridge, whose new account has cast an already tragic death in an even more poignant light.

Unearthing private and previously unpublished memoirs, Bostridge has constructed an intriguing new theory about Brittain’s secret life and about his death that says much about the social and sexual mores of the time. According to Vera’s famous memoir, her brother was killed by a sniper, but Bostridge believes it is more likely that, maddened by despair, he threw himself on enemy fire.

Testament Of Youth has become a major part in the way the Great War, which started 100 years ago, is remembered and understood.

It reached a vast new audience with the acclaimed BBC serial starring Cheryl Campbell in 1979. Thanks to the movie, released on January 16 [2015] and starring Swedish actress Alicia Vikander as Vera [right], it is about to reach millions more.

An Army nurse during the war, Vera later became a leading pacifist author and was the mother of the Labour-turned-Liberal Democrat politician Baroness Shirley Williams.

Edward Brittain was born in 1895, the only son and heir to his father Thomas, a wealthy paper manufacturer, and the apple of his mother Edith’s eye.

He had a privileged childhood in the Derbyshire spa town of Buxton and grew close to his sister Vera, who was two years older.

At his public school, Uppingham in Rutland, Edward formed a close friendship with Roland Leighton and Victor Richardson. The trio became almost inseparable, and were known as ‘the three musketeers’.



Above (from left): Taron Egerton as Edward Brittain, Alicia Vikander as Vera Brittain, Kit Harington as Roland Leighton, and Colin Morgan as Victor Richardson in Testament of Youth.


Roland and Victor eventually vied for the love of Vera, who they met during idyllic holidays in the Peak District. According to Bostridge, Edward’s love interests, however, lay in another direction. The atmosphere in Britain’s single-sex public schools before 1914 was laced with homo-eroticism, and the biographer believes that Edward – gradually realising that he was gay – formed at least one such relationship while he was at Uppingham.

Edward won a place to study at New College, Oxford, and played a major part in persuading his reluctant parents to let his sister study at the same university. They, like many other upper middle-class couples, only saw a future for their daughter in terms of her finding a suitable husband.

But the year was 1914, and the likelihood of war cast its shadow over the Brittain siblings.

Like thousands of others, Edward, who had served in Uppingham’s Officer Training Corps, deferred his studies, and enlisted, gaining an officer’s commission in the Sherwood Foresters regiment.

Vera began to read for an English literature degree at Oxford’s Somerville College, but as the conflict continued and her suitors Roland and Victor also joined up, Vera decided that she had to do her bit too, and became an Army nurse. By then, Roland had won the battle for her heart, and they were engaged. Their love was short-lived. In December 1915, Roland was killed, shot in the stomach by a sniper while repairing barbed wire in no man’s land.

On July 1, 1916, the first day of the Battle of the Somme, almost 20,000 British soldiers died and twice that number were wounded within a few appalling minutes. Edward was one of them. He was hit in the thigh and arm attempting to rally his troops. In agony, he crawled back to the British trenches, through corpses turning yellow and green in the summer heat. The experience, he later told his sister, had made his patriotism ‘wear rather threadbare’.

Recovering from his injuries in England, he was awarded the Military Cross, which was pinned to his chest by King George V at Buckingham Palace.

While training for the trenches, Edward had met and formed an intimate relationship with Geoffrey Thurlow [right], a sensitive scholar who wanted to become a priest, but had returned to the front despite being badly shell-shocked.

To judge from the nature of their correspondence, it might ‘have gone beyond the bounds of a chaste friendship’, says Bostridge.

Vera became a penpal of her brother’s new friend too, but nothing could sever Vera’s bond with Edward – and there are hints in the letters they exchanged that she strongly suspected the true nature of his sexual orientation.

‘Where you and I are concerned,’ she wrote in February 1917, ‘sex by itself doesn’t interest us unless it is united with brains and personality. In fact we rather think of the latter first and the person’s sex afterwards . . . you will probably have to wait a good many years before you find anyone you could wish to marry, but I don’t think this need worry you for there is plenty of time . . .’

But Vera’s hopeful words were wrong. Time, for Edward, was fast running out.

In the spring of 1917, the war took both Thurlow – shot through the lungs – and the second of Uppingham’s three musketeers, Vera’s former suitor Victor.



Above: Vera Brittain as a Voluntary Aid Detachment nurse, 1915.


Now all Vera’s love and desperate anxiety focused on the last surviving musketeer – who was enduring the muddy hell of the battle of Passchendaele.

Then, in November 1917, came what seemed to be a reprieve.

Edward and his battalion, the 11th Sherwood Foresters, were pulled out of the Western Front in Flanders and sent south to support Britain’s ally, Italy.

German and Austrian troops had smashed through the front in the Alps, routing the Italians. With Britain’s help, the front was successfully stabilised and by the summer of 1918 Italy seemed like a quiet place to see out the war.

Vera allowed herself to breathe with relief once again.

But the reprieve was not to last. On June 22, 1918, the telegram boy delivered the terrible news of Edward’s death to the Brittain’s home in Buxton.

So how and why exactly did Edward die?

There were puzzling discrepancies in the accounts the Brittains received of his last hours.

It remained a possibility, for example, that Edward had shot himself. The official story as recounted by Vera in Testament Of Youth – published to acclaim in 1933 – was that he had been shot by a sniper on June 15 while heroically leading his men in a triumphant counter-attack against Austrian forces on the plateau of Asiago, 4,000ft up in the Italian Alps.

He was the only officer killed in the battle.

In 1934, Edward’s Commanding Officer, Colonel Charles Hudson, a career soldier and a holder of the Victoria Cross, sought Vera out and told her what had really happened to her brother.

What he said in that private meeting remained a secret until only recently, when Bostridge dug out the story.

It’s reasonable to assume that Hudson told Vera that Edward had either shot himself, or deliberately courted death rather than endure the shame and disgrace of a court martial. Bostridge was able to put the pieces together because he tracked down Hudson’s son in Devon, who showed him a private memoir, written by his father.

The author discovered that the day before Edward’s death, Hudson had heard from the Provost Marshal in charge of the local military police that a letter from Edward to another officer had been opened by censors. The letter made clear not only that the two men were in a gay relationship, but that Edward had also been similarly involved with ordinary soldiers in his company.

He had crossed the barriers outlawing homosexuality and – perhaps more damningly in consorting with men of lower rank – the strict class divides of his time too.

Though forbidden by the Military Police to tell Edward that he was under investigation and would certainly face a court martial and public disgrace as well as probable imprisonment, Hudson decided to drop a broad hint of what awaited him to his subordinate officer.

‘I didn’t realise that letters written up here were censored at the base,’ he said. Edward made no reply, but went as ‘white as a sheet’ and quietly left the room.

Within hours he was dead, at the age of 22.

‘What seems to have happened,’ says Bostridge, ‘is that, unable to face his family and the wider world with the truth of his sexuality in an age when being gay was considered criminal, he either shot himself, or more probably deliberately exposed himself to enemy fire.
‘He was found shot through the head after running ahead of his men as they went over the top.’

We may never know what truly happened to Edward, although his courage is beyond question.

Vera never openly acknowledged what she had been told about her brother’s tragic fate, preferring to carry the secret to her grave. There is no hint in Testament Of Youth.

Yet there is one more intriguing twist. In 1936, after learning the truth from Hudson, she wrote a novel called Honourable Estate in which a fictional officer hero deliberately chooses death rather than revealing his homosexuality.

‘She never got over Edward’s death,’ says Bostridge.

Vera Brittain died in March 1970. That year Shirley Williams made a pilgrimage to Asiago where Edward lies with 141 of his comrades, killed in the same battle, in the lonely military cemetery of Granezza. In accordance with Vera’s wishes, she scattered her mother’s ashes on Edward’s grave. After almost half a century’s separation, the loving siblings were at last reunited.

Vera Brittain and The First World War, by Mark Bostridge, is published by Bloomsbury.


____________________




Louis was my dearest friend
fighting in the ANZAC trench.
Louis ran forward from the line,
and I never saw him again.

Later in the dark
I thought I heard Louis' voice
calling for his mother, then me,
but I couldn't get to him.

He's still up on that hill.
Twenty years on that hill.
Nothing more than a pile of bones,
but I think of him still.

If I was asked I'd tell
the colour of the earth that day;
it was dull, and browny-red,
"the colour of blood" I'd say.

– "The Colour of the Earth"
by PJ Harvey
(from her 2011 album, Let England Shake)

Image: Two World War 1 soldiers.
(Subjects and photographer unknown)


Related Off-site Links:
Testament of Youth: Vera Brittain's Classic, 80 Years On – Elizabeth Day (The Guardian, March 23, 2013).
The Making of a Peacenik – Mark Bostridge (The Guardian, August 29, 2003).
Hatred and Homosexuality: Gay Men in the First World War – Gaz Morris (VADA Magazine, February 22, 2014).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Quote of the Day – November 10, 2015
The Christmas Truce of 1914
Remembering Wilfred Owen
The Origins of Mother's Day
All on a Beautiful Morning
Manly Love


Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Quote of the Day

Many years ago I became fed up with the hollow thank yous and stopped celebrating Veterans Day. Today I join with Veterans For Peace in a call to reclaim November 11th as Armistice Day – a day to think about peace and thank those who served by working to end war. I’m tired of us vets being used for war and then many of us being pretty much discarded. Instead of thanking us, change how we are treated and work to end war. That is a real tribute.

– Michael McPhearson
Excerpted from "Don’t Thank Me Anymore
. . . Just Care for Veterans Who Return
and Work To End All War
"
Common Dreams
November 10, 2015


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Challenge of Peace
All on a Beautiful Morning
Vigiling Against Weaponized Drones
The "Fool Soldiers" of the Lakota
Remembering Dorothy Day's Response to the U.S. Bombing of Hiroshima
The Origins of Mother's Day
The Tenth Anniversary of the U.S. Invasion of Iraq
Walking Against Weapons
Alliant Action
Award-winning "Hellraisers" at It Again
Marv Davidov, 1931-2012
In Search of a "Global Ethic"


Sunday, November 08, 2015

What We Mean by Love


"That one day you find someone, and everything they are
comes back to you in a strange way that hums . . .
that fits, that's beautiful."


I'm currently reading Richard Flanagan's powerful novel, The Narrow Road to the Deep North. It's not an easy read, given its graphic depiction of atrocities suffered by the main character Dorrigo Evans and his fellow Australian prisoners-of-war at the hands of their World War II Japanese captors. The book's publishing company notes that it is a "savagely beautiful novel," one that "tells a story of the many forms of love and death, of war and truth." I think that's a very accurate summation.

One part of the novel that particularly resonates with me is when, after the war, the widow of Jack Rainbow shares with Dorrigo Evans her thoughts on love. It's a very beautiful reflection, and one that conveys an understanding of love capable of being experienced, I believe, by anyone – regardless of sexual orientation. Hence my choosing of the above image from the film Lilting, itself a powerful story of love and loss, to accompany my sharing of this particular excerpt from Flanagan's novel that so deeply moves me. Perhaps it will move you too.

Do you believe in love, Mr Evans? . . . I don't. No, I don't. It's too small a word, don't you think, Mr. Evans? I have a friend in Fern Tree who teaches piano. Very musical, she is. I'm tone-deaf myself. But one day she was telling me how every room has a note. You just have to find it. She started warbling away, up and down. And suddenly one note came back to us, just bounced back off the walls and rose from the floor and filled the place with this perfect hum. This beautiful sound. Like you've thrown a plum and an orchard comes back at you. You wouldn't believe it, Mr Evans. These two completely different things, a note and a room, finding each other. It sounded . . . right. Am I being ridiculous? Do you think that's what we mean by love, Mr Evans? The note that comes back to you? That finds you even when you don't want to be found? That one day you find someone, and everything they are comes back to you in a strange way that hums? That fits. That's beautiful. I'm not explaining myself at all well, am I? I'm not very good with words. But that's what we were. Jack and me. We didn't really know each other. I'm not sure if I liked everything about him. I suppose some things about me annoyed him. But I was that room and he was that note and now he's gone. And everything is silent.

– Excerpted from The Narrow Road to the Deep North
by Richard Flanagan
(Vintage International, 2013, pp 328-329)


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Love as "Quest and Daring and Growth"
The Gravity of Love
Getting It Right
The Choice (and Risk) That is Love
To Know and Be Known
Love as Exploring Vulnerability
Liberated to Be Together
Love is Love
Passion, Tide and Time
The Longing for Love: God's Primal Beatitude
The Many Manifestations of God's Loving Embrace
Quote of the Day – October 5, 2010
Dew[y]-Kissed

Image: Andrew Leung and Ben Whishaw in Hong Khaou's 2014 film Lilting.


Thursday, November 05, 2015

James Alison on the Likely "Really Big Deal" of Synod 2015

I have to say I really appreciate theologian James Alison's perspective on the issue that the recently-concluded Synod on the Family chose to avoid. This issue is, of course, the place of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Catholics in the church family. A major part of my appreciation stems from Alison's contention that perhaps "for the first time . . . the bishops seem to have faced up to having a genuine problem on their hands that is their problem, not that of LGBT people, and no apparent way out of it without help." If this is indeed the case, says Alison, then it is "a really big deal."

The bishops' "problem" is official church teaching on homosexuality, about which Alison writes: "There is no way to communicate current teaching mercifully, or with less hateful language – maybe because that teaching’s premise of the objectively disordered nature of the 'homosexual inclination' is actually false?"

Yet as appreciative as I am of Alison's perspective, I have to wonder why he chose to express the last part of this powerful statement as a question and not as a fact, not as an observable reality. The Roman Catholic clerical caste's premise for its teaching on homosexuality and, by extension, on human sexuality is false. And I think that as Catholics attuned to the presence of God in the lives and relationships of all, we need to be very clear in saying that there's no "maybe" about it.

The words I use to describe both this premise and the teaching produced by it are erroneous, dysfunctional, and dangerous.* I know Alison would agree, so why the "maybe" and the question-posing strategy? Some might say it's simply a rhetorical question, that Alison is modeling the type of question that members of the hierarchy should be asking and that perhaps, he suggests, Pope Francis is inviting them to ask. Yet I question if we should ever shy away from unequivocally stating that the hierarchy's sexual theology (which is actually a narrow marital theology) is erroneous, dysfunctional, and dangerous. We owe it to ourselves and our experiences as LGBT Catholics, and to the young people and others struggling with and threatened by the homo-negativity produced by the Vatican's stance on sexuality, to make such unequivocal statements, no matter what the forum. Lives are very much at stake, and so I find the reluctance of many LGBT and/or progressive Catholic commentators to unequivocally reject the hierarchy's teaching on sexuality, to take any and every opportunity to declare it erroneous, dysfunctional, and dangerous, to be both disappointing and perplexing.

I should add that equally disappointing and perplexing to my mind is the failure to reject the feudal monarchical system that produces such false and damaging teaching, and the reluctance to identify this system as the antithesis of Jesus' life and message.

Having said all this, I still appreciate and value James Alison's efforts to offer hope with regards to the hierarchy's ongoing journey in understanding of homosexuality. Accordingly, I share the following excerpt from his commentary in the November 7, 2015 issue of The Tablet.

There were two weak-minded “ways out” of the current hierarchical impasse in the Church on matters gay – the first, a bombastic reaffirmation of current teaching as obviously right, the solution of the deluded pure; the second, that the teaching is right, but that there is a problem with the language in which it is communicated – the solution of the ­cowardly cosmeticians. I’m delighted to say we got neither. The low-key reaffirmations of loyalty to current positions in the final ­document have “pro tem” written all over them; and the general dropping from view of matters LGBT towards the end of the synod suggests that something much more interesting may have happened.

It is just conceivable that enough synod participants realised that there is no way to communicate current teaching mercifully, or with less hateful language – maybe because that teaching’s premise of the objectively disordered nature of the “homosexual inclination” is actually false? Teaching others, with however pretty a language, that they must buy into a falsehood about themselves so as to fit into pre-determined schemes of what is right or wrong, is to demand that they indulge a fragile rigidity that is the teachers’ problem, not their own – classic Pharisaism.

I suspect there was enough of a recognition that there is no genuine way out of the impasse without raising a question of doctrine, for it to be better to go quiet on the issue, and punt further study and discussion of the matter to the Holy Father – and quite possibly to the new dicastery he has announced dedicated to laity, family and life. If something like this was what happened, then I’d like to say: this is a really big deal. For the first time in my memory, the bishops seem to have faced up to having a genuine problem on their hands that is their problem, not that of LGBT people, and no apparent way out of it without help.

It is here, I think, that we see something of the genius of Pope Francis. I had feared that his statements about not changing doctrinal matters, but focusing on the pastoral, were a sign of weakness in the face of intransi­gent hardliners and would lead to cosmetic solutions. What a joy to be wrong! It seems rather, that he wanted people to run up against the dead ends of many current positions together so not only would they begin to dare to ask each other, and the Pope, the sort of questions which might lead to a more adult discussion of the matters at hand, but it would actually lead to a consensus of teachers realising that they need to, and want to, think more.

For in fact, when it comes to matters LGBT, the theological issues are not difficult to resolve. As a matter of group psychology, however, allowing the synod fathers, more than a few of whom have a personally complicated involvement with the matter at hand, to reach a consensus that the status quo is untenable, and thus that they actually want to find a way forward: that is difficult indeed. Yet something like the beginnings of this can be detected in the synod’s having punted on this issue: ­nothing now, so as to talk better, later.

It has long been noted that the Second Vatican Council opened up a way for an approach to learning what is true, what is of God, that makes room for the inductive – learning by experience of being led to truth – rather than the deductive approach, dedu­cing the logical consequences of doctrinal a prioris and then instructing people that this is what they ought to know, to think and to feel. And it has equally been noted, since Humanae Vitae, that among many areas where the Church is quite at ease with the inductive, experiential approach, there remains a strictly protected island in which the deductive, syllogistic approach is still regarded as synonymous with “doctrine”. It is no surprise, therefore, that it is in this area, touching on every aspect of family intimacy and the ability to talk honestly, that there is the greatest schism between “official doctrine” and “life.”

– James Alison
Excerpted from "Love in a Changing Climate"
The Tablet
November 7, 2015


* When I say the current teaching on LGBT issues is dangerous, I mean it both perpetuates the "blood-soaked thread" of anti-gay violence that's part of Roman Catholicism's history and contributes to the internalized homo-negativity of LGBT people, a homo-negativity that has been shown to predict poor emotional and sexual health.


Related Off-site Links:
Conspiracy of the Faithful: Following the Synod, from Afar – Catherine Wolff (Commonweal, November 2, 2015).
Gay and Catholic: What It’s Like to Be Queer in the Church – Debora Fougere (Aljazeera America, October 31, 2015).
LGBT Catholics Worship and Seek Acceptance Outside the Church – Amanda Guillen (Scripps Howard Foundation Wire, November 5, 2015).
Gay Priest Who Lost Vatican Job Assails the Church in Letter to Pope Francis – Gaia Piaigiani (The New York Times, October 28, 2015).
Ragged Questions After the Synod – Deafening Silence About How the Homosexuals Took Another One Upside the Head to Facilitate Pastoral Breakthrough for Everyone Else – William D. Lindsey (Bilgrimage, October 27, 2015).
How to Be Happy, Catholic and Gay – Terence Weldon (The Queer Church Repository, October 20, 2015).
To Have a Truly Just Church, Pope Francis Must Move Beyond Complementarity – Jamie Manson (National Catholic Reporter, May 6, 2015).
Homosexual Relationships: Another Look – Bill Hunt (The Progressive Catholic Voice, September 8, 2012).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
"Trajectory is More Important Than the Current Status"
Stop in the Name of Discriminatory Ideology!
The Non-Negotiables of Human Sex
Quote of the Day – May 29, 2015
A "Fruit" Reflects Upon the Meaning of "Fruitfulness"
What the Vatican Can Learn from the X-Men
Beyond Respectful Tolerance to Celebratory Acceptance
The "Ratzinger Letter" of 1986 as "Theological Pornography"
How the Pope's Recent Remarks on Evolution Highlight a Major Discrepancy in Church Teaching
The Gifts of Homosexuality
Remembering and Reclaiming a Wise, Spacious, and Holy Understanding of Homosexuality
Good News on the Road to Emmaus
Catholic Hierarchy Can Overcome Fear of LGBT People