Saturday, September 25, 2010

Quote of the Day

The whole gay thing seems to be [Archbishop John] Neinstedt’s personal vendetta and a red herring taking us away from the real important issues. I want to respond with creativity and hope for an inclusive world rather than with anger and hate. I mean somebody’s got to break that cycle . . . and it’s a Christian’s job to do it.

– Lucinda Naylor
Quoted in Andy Birkey's article, "Minnesotan Seeks to Creatively Reuse
Catholic Church's Anti-Gay Marriage DVDs
"
Minnesota Independent
September 24, 2010



Related Off-site Link:
Archbishop John Nienstedt's Anti-Gay DVD Becomes Art Fodder – Hart Van Denburg (City Pages, September 24, 2010).


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
What to Do With the MN Bishops' DVD
Misplaced Priorities
It's a Scandal
The Minnesota Bishops' Last Ditch Effort
A Message to NOM (and the Catholic Hierarchy)
At UST, a Rounsing and Very Catholic Show of Support for Marriage Equality
A Catholic Voice for Marriage Equality at the State Capitol
A Christian Case for Same-Sex Marriage


Europe 2005

Part 4: Ah, Venezia!


In the summer of 2005 my parents and I spent two weeks traveling in Europe. I continue today with the special series of posts documenting our European adventure! (To start at the beginning of this series, click here.)



Friday, August 26, 2005

I’ve been in Venice for only twenty minutes yet already feel that this is going to be one of my favorite places of our tour. The walk from where the bus dropped us off to the Continental Hotel, situated right on the Grand Canal, was full of interesting and exciting sights and sounds. At 6:00 p.m. we’ll be embarking on a gondola ride and then returning to the hotel where we’ll be dining. Later, I plan to go out by myself and explore this unique city.



Above: St. Mark's Basilica, the cathedral church of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Venice.


Left: Mum and Dad in the Piazza San Marco (Saint Mark's Square). Behind my parents is St. Mark's Basilica, of which Wikipedia notes the following:

[St. Mark's] is the most famous of the city's churches and one of the best known examples of Byzantine architecture. It lies on Piazza San Marco adjacent and connected to the Doge's Palace. Originally it was the "chapel" of the Venetian rulers, and not the city's cathedral. Since 1807 it has been the seat of the Patriarch of Venice, archbishop of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Venice. For its opulent design, gilded Byzantine mosaics, and its status as a symbol of Venetian wealth and power, from the 11th century on the building was known by the nickname Chiesa d'Oro (Church of Gold).



Above: St. Mark's Basilica (left) and the Doge's Palace (right).


Above: St Mark's Campanile (Campanile di San Marco in Italian), the bell tower of St Mark's Basilica, perhaps the most recognizable building of Venice.



Saturday, August 27, 2005

Venice is shaping up to be my favourite place in Europe I've visited so far. For one thing I love that there are absolutely no cars! The Grand Canal, however, can get pretty chaotic, what with countless gondolas and all sorts of speeding boats and ferries vying for space.

I find the buildings incredibly beautiful, and I especially enjoy the Turkish influences reflected in much of the architecture. I wander the back streets, alleys and canals and get totally (and happily) lost! There's so much to see and so much atmosphere to simply absorb. I find myself photographing all kinds of interesting buildings - in particular, their ornamentation and windows.



Above: The Basilica of St Mary of Health (Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute in Italian).



Above: Brightly-painted houses on the island of Burano in the Venetian Lagoon. Located seven kilometres from Venice, Burano is a 40 minute trip by motorboat.

Above: A view of Venice's San Giorgio Maggiore Island - August 26, 2005.


NEXT: Rome and Florence


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
Europe 2005 - Part 1: London
Europe 2005 - Part 2: Bruges and Brussels
Europe 2005 - Part 3: Germany and Austria
Casanova-Inspired Reflections on Papal Power - at 30,000 Ft.


Recommended Off-site Link:
Seven Cities About to Sink - Miriam B. Weiner (Yahoo! Travel, October 2010).


Friday, September 24, 2010

Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake


In February of 2006 I attended a performance of Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake at the Historic State Theatre in Minneapolis.

Wikipedia notes the following about this beautiful and innovative dance performance.

Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake is a piece of ballet-influenced contemporary dance choreographed by Matthew Bourne that was first staged at Sadler’s Wells theatre in London in 1995. The longest running ballet in London’s West End and on Broadway, it has enjoyed two successful tours in the UK and thrilled audiences in Los Angeles, Europe, Australia and Japan.

The ballet is based loosely on the Russian romantic ballet
Swan Lake, from which it takes the music by Tchaikovsky and the broad outline of the plot. Stylistic inspiration also came from the Alfred Hitchcock film The Birds. The ballet is particularly known for having the parts of the swans danced by men rather than women.

. . . The original ballet is a standard in the European tradition of romanticized female–male love. The heroine, the swan princess Odette, is portrayed as powerless but lovely in accordance with conventional gender roles, and her hero is portrayed as a hunter who alone has the power to save her. Having a man in the role of lead Swan puts love between men at center stage, and the naturalistic choreography given to the swan corps discredits the archetype of the swan as a pretty, feminine bird of gentle grace.

According to Bourne, “The idea of a male swan makes complete sense to me. The strength, the beauty, the enormous wingspan of these creatures suggests to the musculature of a male dancer more readily than a ballerina in her white tutu.”


This evening, as part of The Wild Reed’s ongoing series celebrating dance, I share a video clip of the finale from Bourne’s Swan Lake and excerpts from a review of the show by David Roberts. Enjoy!






When we are not loved as we need to be loved, we often survive the deprivation through fantasy. We enter a fantasy of our own making or perhaps a more universal fantasy we share with other persons searching for acceptance and love.

Matthew Bourne has found in Tchaikovsky's Swan Lake score the powerful story of love searched for, love unrequited, and love’s redeeming power when it is found. In so doing, he finds a story more universal than the original 1877 Tchaikovsky and Wenzel Reisinger Swan Lake or its 1895 Petipa-Ivavov revision.

Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake is pure theatre and is most likely the most impressive and significant show to open on Broadway in a long time. The scope of its significance has no bounds and the impression it makes on the psyche and soul is indelible.

. . . Matthew Bourne has created an intense psychological drama. His choice of male swans is exactly what Tchaikovsy's music requires. These beautiful bare chested dancers (and the black leathered version of The Swan at the party) are the perfect medium for the Prince to discover and celebrate his sexuality. And although the Prince is unashamedly gay, Swan Lake is universal in its appeal and accessible to all persons who know what it means to be misunderstood, confused about sexuality and love, and long for intimacy and relationship.

“People write to me and say, ‘Oh, it’s about my father, a missing father figure, or about someone you can’t have, really,” says Bourne. “Basically, it’s this thing of someone who needs to be loved, and the heart of the Prince/Swan relationship is just the Prince being held. That’s the emotional high point, or at least it should be.”

Neither royal families nor families of swans tolerate well what they perceive as vastly different from the norm, especially if that difference might result in defection or abandonment of the family and its traditions, norms, values, and expectations. The Prince’s Swan fantasy allows the character and the audience to experience at the deepest levels the issues of becoming a distinct, separate individual and the risks involved in “leaving the flock.”

For the Prince and his love the male Swan, redemption comes through death. But not even the pecking of his swan mates nor the poking and prodding of the Prince’s nurses and doctor can ultimately defeat the love the two found in each other’s embrace.

As the Queen approaches her dead son on his bed – the closest she has come to expressing any sincere human emotion throughout – the audience sees the Swan and the Prince above and beyond the bed, in an embrace which will eternally link their hearts and their love and gives hope to all who search for love and meaning in relationship.

When our “perceived” self merges with our “real” self, there is usually some kind of death and loss, but more importantly, there is a rebirth.

When the curtain rises for the cast’s curtain call, the two leads come on stage first to take their bows. And this seems very right. It is important for the audience to know that these two actors/dancers and these two characters care for one another, love one another. As the rest of the cast appears, the audience feels just a little closer to believing that true love is possible, that women and men can find and give non-judgmental and unconditional love to others and to themselves.

Bravo, Matthew Bourne!!

– David Roberts




NOTE: Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake is available on DVD. For more information, click here.


Recommended Off-site Link:
The Official Website of Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake


Thursday, September 23, 2010

What To Do With the MN Bishops' DVD

As I’ve noted previously, Archbishop John Nienstedt is one of a number of Minnesota Roman Catholic bishops instigating and promoting a campaign opposing marriage equality for same-sex couples.

A major component of this campaign has been the producing and distributing of a DVD to 400,000 Catholic households throughout the state. This DVD features a segment produced by the Knights of Columbus and comprised of various talking heads disseminating falsehoods about how gay marriage harms straight marriage and threatens the well-being of children. The DVD also features a segment in which Archbishop Nienstedt shares his Tea Party-like disdain for the role of government in protecting the rights of minorities, and for what he calls the “ruling elites.” Of course, the grim irony is that within the sphere of Roman Catholicism, Nienstedt himself is the head of a “ruling elite” that does not allow “the people,” i.e., the laity, a say in decision-making.

Thankfully, such hypocrisy is not lost on people in this day and age - nor are the scandalously misguided priorities of the bishops' overall campaign. As a result, I've been receiving phone calls from fellow Catholics wanting to know if there is some organized response plan regarding the mailing of the bishops' DVD.

These Catholics know and love LGBT people, and they want to work to ensure their full equality in civil society. What then, are they to do when this DVD containing such a rabidly anti-gay and anti-marriage equality message arrives on their doorstep?

Well, as I’ve noted in a previous post, OutFront Minnesota is recommending people simply return it unopened to the Archdiocese. “Return to Sender,” in other words.

And here’s Eric Celeste’s thoughts on the issue and her suggestion for what to do with the DVD:

Our Archbishop is telling us to make a decision based on a single fringe issue when it could cost us the opportunity to care for the most fragile and vulnerable in our society. Is this really what the gospel calls you to do?

I don’t really care to convince you one way or the other right now about the election . . . but I do want to convince you to stand up and tell the Archbishop that this is an offensive use of his pulpit. Return the DVD.

Here’s what I suggest. If you get this DVD in the mail, take it to church and put it in the basket at collection time instead of a financial contribution. . . . Make a contribution that really says something this week.


By far the most creative idea is that of local artist Lucinda Naylor. Here’s what she says on the Facebook page she’s established for her project:

I have a button that says “Art Changes Everything.” Let’s use the Archbishop’s DVD to change the message from one of division and fear into a piece of art about inclusion and the joyful Spirit that moves among us.

Please spread the word among your friends. The more DVDs we can collect, the larger the piece of art, and the bigger the statement the art makes.

I need volunteers to help collect the DVDs. Would you be willing to collect DVDs from your fellow parishioners? Or stand with boxes (on the public sidewalks/streets) near your church before mass to collect the DVDs (this Sunday [September 26] and/or next Sunday – depending on when the mailing arrives in your zip code)?

For this to work, people need to hear about it first – so, again, spread the word!

In addition, I will post a location where people can drop off or mail DVDs.


What a wonderfully creative idea! If you'd like to help with Lucinda's project, e-mail DVDtoART@gmail.com.


UPDATE: The word about Lucinda's idea is getting out there! See, for instance, this article by Andy Birkey in The Minnesota Independent.


See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
The Minnesota Bishops' Last Ditch Effort
Return to Sender
It's a Scandal
Misplaced Priorities


Recommended Off-site Link:
American Catholic Support for Gay Equality is On the Rise
CatholicsForEquality.org (September 14, 2010).

Misplaced Priorities

Mmm . . . nothing about "I was gay and you
denied me civil marriage rights."


The Washington Independent recently published an interesting article by Jesse Zwick on the Knights of Columbus and their funding of efforts to deny civil marriage rights to same-sex couples — at the expense, mind you, of their services to the poor. See what I mean by “misplaced priorities”?

According to Zwick, the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic fraternity society, gave “a whopping $1.4 million in 2009 to the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), a nonprofit group dedicated to fighting same-sex marriage through the ballot initiative system in California, Maine and other states.”

The Knights’ donation to NOM, notes Zwick “eclipses what [it] spent on some of its own charitable programs — such as its new effort supporting food banks or its total spending on education initiatives — in the same year, much to the outrage of some observers, including Catholic groups.”

Here in Minnesota, the funding of anti-marriage equality organizations and initiatives is an especially relevant issue. The Catholic Conference of Bishops has recently launched a campaign opposing same-sex civil marriage. This campaign includes the mailing of a DVD to 400,000 Catholics - a DVD produced by the Knights of Columbus, and a mailing estimated by some to have cost over one million dollars. Interviewed yesterday on Minnesota Public Radio, Archbishop Nienstedt said that he did not know how much it cost to produce or distribute the DVD and that a private donor who funded the effort had “asked to remain anonymous.” The Archbishop didn't say if he had suggested to the donor that a more Gospel-oriented cause would be better served by such a generous donation.

Following are excerpts from Zwick’s September 20 Washington Independent article.

_______________________________________


Gay-rights activists have long speculated that the Mormon Church was the primary benefactor behind NOM. But the Knights of Columbus disclosure shows the Catholic group played a pivotal role in funding NOM’s efforts to deny marriage rights to gay and lesbian couples.

. . . NOM continues to spend millions on its legal challenges in Maine, its deep pockets apparently dictating a strategy to challenge and delay disclosing its donors’ names in the courts as long as possible. But the Knights of Columbus’s role in funding NOM — as well as more overt forms of support for Maine’s Amendment 1 initiative from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland, Maine – are prompting Catholics opposed to the Church’s involvement in marriage equality issues to organize and speak out.

“You’ve got this really interesting funnel of tax-free money coming from the Dioceses and the Council of Bishops and the Knights of Columbus directly to these campaigns,” notes Phil Attey, executive director of the newly launched organization, Catholics for Equality. “Why are groups like NOM hiding where they’re getting their money? If it turns out to be a front group for the conservative side of the church, Catholics have the right to know because the majority of American Catholics, and we can show you heaps of polls, don’t support that [kind of spending].”

Knights’ spokesman Patrick Korten sees NOM’s noncompliance with disclosure laws in a different light. “The fact of the matter is that those who favor same sex marriage are working hard to intimidate individuals and groups that support our cause, but [the Knights] are big enough that intimidation doesn’t work on us.”

In addition to the opacity of NOM’s funding, some Catholic activists have also taken offense to the fact that, in an economic downturn, the Knights of Columbus Supreme Council’s funding for anti-gay marriage causes has outstripped the amount of funds it supplied for several deserving charitable programs it highlights in its 2010 report.

“As the recession has continued to make it difficult for people who have become unemployed or underemployed, or otherwise get by on lower incomes, the Knights of Columbus has stepped in to help,” notes the Knights’ 2010 report. It highlights a $1 million fund set up by the Supreme Council to supplement the efforts of local councils to support food banks through its new “Food For Families” program, and it touts its Coats for Kids program, which distributed coats to needy children.

But the Supreme Council’s spending on the two programs together still represents less than the $1.4 million it donated to NOM’s anti-gay marriage efforts in 2009. And the Council also donated an additional half million to NOM and $1.15 million to the California ProtectMarriage.com campaign the year prior. The Supreme Council’s total spending on community projects in 2009 (which include soup kitchens, homeless shelters, well drilling projects, and other forms of relief worldwide) totals approximately $3.5 million — an amount that exceeds its giving to anti-gay marriage proposition campaigns, but not by much. The Council’s spending on educational programs in 2009 totaled barely more than $1 million.

Korten nonetheless contends that the Supreme Council’s donations do not paint a full picture of the Knights of Columbus’ annual giving, calling its donations to organizations like NOM “a very small percentage” of the group’s charitable donations. “The vast majority of our charitable work is raised by local councils and that’s always been the case,” he adds.

But other Catholic activists predict that such spending on conservative causes will provoke a backlash among the faithful. “Do you think someone in New Mexico thought their donation was going to this effort in Maine, as opposed to aiding the sick and feeding the hungry?” asks George Burns, an attorney in Maine who fought NOM’s campaign to pass Amendment 1.

“If Catholics find out that while their parishes are closing, and charity work is being underfunded, that our church hierarchy is playing political games with their money, we believe that they’ll be as concerned as we are,” argues Attey.


Recommended Off-site Link:
Why is Archbishop Nienstedt Blaming Gays for the Failures of Heterosexual Marriage? – Colleen Kochivar-Baker (Enlightened Catholicism, September 23, 2010).
Catholics Say Anti-Gay Marriage Campaign Not Political, Gay Groups Disagree – Andy Birkey (Minnesota Independent, September 23, 2010).
Minnesota Archbishop: "There is No Difference Between the Civil and Religious Definition of Marriage" GoodAsYou.org (September 23, 2010).
Church Idiocy in Minnesota – Terence Weldon (Queering the Church, September 23, 2010).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
It’s a Scandal
The Minnesota Bishops’ Last Ditch Effort
Return to Sender
A Message for NOM
At UST, a Rousing and Very Catholic Show of Support for Same-Sex Marriage
The Misplaced Priorities of the Catholic Church in Maine
A Call to Emphasize Catholicism's "Sweet Spot"
Rebel Knights


Wednesday, September 22, 2010

It’s a Scandal


Minnesota bishops spend big on a misguided campaign that encourages Catholics to support enshrining discrimination into the State Constitution against gay couples and families.


As executive coordinator of the Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities (CPCSM) I’m quoted in an article in today’s Star Tribune about the Minnesota Conference of (Roman) Catholic Bishops’ campaign against same-sex civil marriage – a campaign that involves the mailing to over 400,000 Catholics of an 18-minute DVD with a strong anti-marriage equality message. As far as I know, the bishops have not disclosed the cost of their campaign, though some have estimated that it could be over one million dollars.

Perhaps, like me, you’re curious as to whether or not the DVD at the center of this expensive campaign explains just how preventing gay civil marriage reflects the Gospel mandate to minister to the least among us. And what was it again Jesus said about homosexuality and gay marriage? Oh, that’s right, absolutely nothing! (He did, of course, mention marriage and his words have been used by some to denounce same-sex marriage. For my take on this, see my 2009 Solidarity Sunday homily, Liberated to Be Together.)

And yet at this time when thousands of Minnesotans are suffering as the result of the economic down turn, and Catholic schools and parishes are threatened with closure, the local clerical leadership sees fit to spend a considerable amount of money on urging Catholics to support discrimination against a minority group in civil society. Yes, it’s a scandal.

And as for the argument that the bishops’ are simply doing their job and educating Catholics on what “the church” teaches about homosexuality and same-sex relationships, I can only say that I’m tired of the clerical leadership’s impoverished understanding of human sexuality being passed off as “Catholic belief” when clearly many of the teachings that comprise this closed-circuit belief system (be they concerned with contraception, masturbation, homosexuality, or the meaning and purpose of sex) have simply not been received and thus accepted by the faithful. We don’t believe what these teachings say. They need to be revisited, revised and updated in the light of science and human experience. Catholic thinking and teaching have changed around moral issues such as usury, slavery, nuclear arms, and labor standards. Our tradition is open, in other words, to its teachings being shaped by historical and scientific knowledge. Why should our understanding of sexuality be immune from such an openness, from such ongoing development? Why is the church's clerical leadership so adamantly opposed to teachings on sexuality and sexual morality being shaped by new insights? Why is a historically conscious approach to some moral issues permitted but an absolutist approach to others strictly enforced? Such inconsistencies comprise yet another scandal, especially given their implications for the intellectual standing of the church and for ordinary Catholics trying to live lives of integrity.

Good teachers are good listeners, and it’s time for the bishops to start listening. And what exactly do they need to start listening to? Well, they could start with gay people’s experiences of the loving and transforming presence of God in their lives and relationships. Hey, if nothing else, it would save them wasting big bucks on
last ditch efforts to stave off the inevitable, and allow them to use that money to help those whom Jesus actually calls us to help.

Below is the Star Tribune article on this controversy, followed by a sampling of comments left by readers on the newspaper’s website.

_______________


Catholics to Get DVDs Opposing Gay Marriage

By Mary Jane Smetank
Star Tribune
September 21, 2010


Critics say the mailing, from state bishops,
is aimed at November voters.


More than 400,000 DVDs are being mailed to the homes of Minnesota Catholics on Wednesday, courtesy of Catholic bishops in the state who want to stop the campaign to legalize same-sex marriage in its tracks.

The 18-minute DVD includes an appearance from St. Paul and Minneapolis Archbishop John Nienstedt in which he says it is time for Minnesotans – not the “ruling elite” of legislators and judges – to vote on a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman. Thirty-one states have passed such an amendment.

“It is the people themselves and not politicians or judges who should make this decision,” Nienstedt says on the DVD. “This is the only way to put the one man, one woman definition of marriage beyond the reach of the courts and politicians.” [The Archbishop comes across as a Tea Partier, what with his clear disdain for the role of government to protect the rights of minorities and his maligning of democratically-elected representatives as part of a “ruling elite.”]

Gay advocates who have worked to change the Catholic Church’s stand on same-sex marriage said that coming six weeks before the November general election, the DVD distribution is aimed squarely at voters.

“It’s an effort to have Catholics vote the way the bishops want them to vote, but by and large Catholic voters are well-educated and they are independent-minded,” said Brian McNeill, president of Dignity Twin Cities. The group for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people works to change what it calls the “antiquated sexual theology” of the church. “We would like to talk to the archbishop about it, but he won’t talk to us,” McNeill said.

Michael Bayly, executive coordinator of the Twin Cities-based Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities, said that because gubernatorial candidates Mark Dayton of the DFL and Tom Horner of the Independence Party support same-sex marriage, the chances are great that Minnesota could have a governor who supports what Bayly calls “marriage equality.” He called the DVD “almost a last-ditch effort to try and influence Catholics to turn the election to ensure that doesn’t happen.”

“It would be really tragic if they succeeded, but I don’t think they will,” Bayly said.

The “educational packet” produced by the Minnesota Catholic Conference, which represents bishops covering the state, includes the DVD and an introductory letter from each local bishop. The video includes Nienstedt’s six-minute appearance and a 12-minute video produced by the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization, warning of the damage that same-sex marriage will do to families, especially children. [Mmm . . . that should be an incredibly short segment of the video! I mean, what and where is the evidence of this “damage”? Will the video include evidence to the contrary – such as, for example, these findings from Iowa, a state that has legalized same-sex civil marriage?]

The Knights of Columbus video includes appearances by a civil rights advocate who quotes the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and a Princeton University professor who says that the well-being of kids is threatened when they don’t grow up in a traditional family. [Patrick J. Ryan, an associate professor of childhood and social institutions at the University of Western Ontario, has penned an excellent response to the so-called “Defense of Traditional Marriage” argument against marriage equality. This response can be read here.] The video warns that if same-sex marriage becomes the law, public schools would teach that same-sex marriage is OK regardless of what parents think and that the religious liberty of Catholics and others would be threatened. [Another canard that is refuted in this Progressive Catholic Voice article.] It says that people who oppose same-sex marriage would be seen as bigots [!] who could be prosecuted and that the accreditation of parochial schools and tax-exempt status of those schools and churches would be threatened. [No, there is a separation of church and state in the U.S. Despite what you may have heard has happened in some other countries, schools and churches in the U.S. would not be threatened in this way. Surely the producers of this DVD know this. Are they therefore purposely lying? ]

Similar DVDs have been sent out in other states, including California and Maine, said Dennis McGrath, spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. He said it was his understanding that the bishops jointly decided to send out the packets here.

“I think they felt the situation had gotten to the point that they had to do something,” McGrath said. “They couldn’t stand by and let this thing go any further. The same-sex marriage train was chugging ahead.”

State Sen. John Marty, a Roseville DFLer who has authored proposals to make Minnesota’s marriage laws gender-neutral, said Tuesday that he will renew those efforts if he wins reelection this fall. He said the bishops are free to express their opinions but that he believes that shifting public attitudes about same-sex marriage and gay rights have moved Minnesotans past the debate the bishops seem to want to create.

“I think the constitutional amendment push died about four or five years ago,” Marty said. “Even the strongest proponents realize that it’s time has passed, and it’s not going to happen. Times are changing.” [And thank God! Sen. Marty, incidentally, was the keynote speaker at last year’s CPCSM Annual Community Meeting. To read what he had to say about his efforts to ensure marriage equality in Minnesota, see the previous Wild Reed post: “We Can Make It Happen.”]

The church mailings were paid for with a private donation, McGrath said. [Oh, and this is suppose to make it okay? The real issue isn’t where the money comes from but the bishops’ decision to spend it in the way that they have and the lack of input from the laity regarding such a significant expenditure.]

______________________


Following are some of the comments that have been shared on the website of the Star Tribune in response to the above article.

Bellamn16 writes: This is an excellent example of why the Catholic church loses 75+% of its young adult (and typically more tolerant) population. And it’s one of the reasons why I stopped regularly attending church. I just don’t understand how a religion that was built on ‘love thy neighbor’ can act this way about a portion of our human population.

Cheiron55401 writes: The Catholics should clean up their own tarnished image before telling the world to clean theirs up.

Europea writes: I’ve had the pleasure of living next door to a lesbian couple raising two sons. One is Mommy and the other is Momma. These two young men are happy, well adjusted kids with really incredible talents. They play football and hockey, and they like girls, though most of their buddies are boys. They don’t seem to have any trouble modeling typical boy behavior. They have uncles and neighbors and other adult males around all the time. My personal experience has put the lie to these silly claims about the required membership of a nuclear family. Good parents can be of the same gender, and bad parents can be of opposite genders. If the Catholic bishops don’t want to perform gay marriage ceremonies, nobody in America will ever force them too, no matter what these foolish DVDs might be telling you. That’s written in the First Amendment. It seems that all the bishops really want to protect is their supposed right to demonize categories of non-Catholics. In that specific regard, I don’t see much difference between their claims and the religious position of the Taliban. It is one of degree rather than kind. I have to question why these bishops are so intent on lying to their own flock, and why so many Catholics are content to ignore their bishops in obvious acts of passive aggression. It really doesn’t seem like a healthy relationship to me.

Luciani writes: Catholics have nothing better to do with their money than this? What a waste. How many people are seriously going to watch it? Four hundred thousand more pieces of junk mail for the landfills.

Lawmusicguy writes: I guess I should stop being surprised when the Catholic Church sinks to yet another level of intolerance, hypocrisy, and absurdity. Yet each time I find myself wondering how this organization can be so out of touch with reality. There is no rational argument that suggests gay people and gay marriage will harm the Catholic Church. No one will force the Church to perform same sex marriages. What gay people want is to be with the partner of their choice, not to attack or be attacked by the Church. Funny that there’s another Strib article about many [Catholic] churches being forced to combine congregations and sell off church buildings due to dwindling numbers. Perhaps some day the Catholic Church will see the correlation between its intolerance and the shrinking parishioners. People are growing tired of the Church’s ignorant interference.

Datelessnerd writes: Sheesh! You really get your money’s worth when you put it in a Catholic collection plate. If it doesn’t go to pay child sex abuse settlements against priests, it’s used to produce homophobic DVDs during the election campaign.


See also the related Wild Reed posts:
Misplaced Priorities
Return to Sender
The Minnesota Bishops’ Last Ditch Effort
A Message for NOM
Archbishop Nienstedt Calls (Again) for a Marriage Amendment to the MN Constitution
Archbishop Nienstedt’s Unconvincing Argument
Archbishop Nienstedt Has It Wrong
Distinguishing Between Roman Catholic Theology and Civil Law in the Struggle for Marriage Equality
Dale Carpenter on the “Win-Win” Reality of Gay Marriage
At UST, a Rousing and Very Catholic Show of Support for Same-Sex Marriage
Minnesotans Rally for Equality and Love at the State Capitol
A Catholic Voice for Marriage Equality at the State Capitol


Recommended Off-site Links:
The Archbishop and the Gay Bogeyman – Tommi Avicolli-Mecca (BeyondChron.com, September 22, 2010).
Gay Marriage Causes No Harm to Traditional Marriage , Study Finds – Scott Raynor (The Iowa Independent, September 8, 2010).
NOM's Anti-Gay Marriage Ad Muddles Martin Luther King's Pro-Gay Message – Paul Schmelzer (Minnesota Independent, September 23, 2010).
Do Religions Reject Gay Marriage? – Daniel Maguire (Consortimnews.com, August 18, 2010).
Young Catholics Will Change the Church on Gay Rights – Michael A. Jones (GayRights.org, September 15, 2010).


Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Quote of the Day

While we are disappointed in today's vote, we are encouraged by the sixteen Catholic Senators who expressed their Catholic social justice values. We are saddened that this vote became a matter of party politics, rather than the real human needs of our national community. Catholics believe in the dignity of the human person, the inviolability of conscience and service to one's country. We will continue to work with Catholic Members of Congress to achieve passage of Don't Ask Don't Tell and urge all Catholic Americans to contact their Senators and make their voices heard.

– Phil Attey
Founding Board Member and Acting Executive Director of Catholics for Equality
Catholics for Equality Responds to Today's Senate Vote on DADT
September 21, 2010


Recommended Off-site Links:
Catholics for Equality
DADT Remains in Place: Arkansas Senators Pryor and Lincoln Vote with Republicans – William D. Lindsey (Bilgrimage, September 21, 2010).


OutFront MN’s Advice to Catholics Receiving the Bishops’ Anti-Marriage Equality DVD . . .


Here’s a follow-up to my recent post, The Minnesota Bishops’ Last Ditch Effort . . .

It’s being reported that the Minnesota Conference of (Roman) Catholic Bishops has produced a DVD urging Catholics to “defend traditional marriage” - ostensibly against the very real possibility that same-sex civil marriage will become legal in Minnesota with the election of a pro-marriage equality governor come November. Hundreds of thousands of copies of this DVD, labeled a “teaching tool” by Archbishop John Nienstedt of the St. Paul-Minneapolis Archdiocese, are being mailed out to Catholics throughout the state. The cost of this campaign, according to OutFront Minnesota, the state’s largest gay rights organization, is over a million dollars.

Following is OutFront Minnesota’s media release about the bishops’ misguided campaign.

____________________________________


OutFront Minnesota to Catholic Archdiocese:
Do Your Anti-Marriage DVDs Feed Hungry People?

In an election year when the minds of Minnesotans are focused on critical issues such as jobs, feeding the hungry, providing homes for people out of work or facing foreclosure, and an unprecedented budget deficit, the Catholic Archdiocese of Minneapolis and Saint Paul has decided to pour its time and energy into opposing legal equality for same-sex couples.

Poll after poll continue to show that Americans are steadily increasing their support for marriage equality,” says OutFront Minnesota Executive Director Monica Meyer. “In Minnesota, two of the three leading gubernatorial candidates support marriage equality and together consistently enjoy stronger support than the one candidate who does not. Americans, and Minnesotans, get the point: allowing same-sex couples to marry legally strengthens families and communities. For the Catholic Archdiocese to divert funds badly needed to help people in crisis in order to respond to something that is patently not a crisis shows a mind-boggling detachment from the realities facing Minnesotans.”

The Archdiocese has announced plans to mail 800,000 DVDs to Catholics across Minnesota. Assuming a cost of just two dollars to produce and mail each DVD, the Diocese has determined that $1.6 million dollars is better spent denying same-sex couples legal protections than on responding to the critical issues facing the state. “How many meals could $1.6 million have provided?” Meyer asks.

“It is no accident that the Archdiocese’s clarion call for discrimination comes in the closing weeks of the 2010 campaign season,” says Meyer. “Using the lives of GLBT people, immigrants, and poor people to provoke fear and advance a political agenda is a time-honored tradition among those whose vision for Minnesota is based on exclusion, marginalization, and demagoguery. It is shameful for a religious institution to stoop to such tactics when there are so many real, pressing issues facing people daily.”

_______________________________


In an e-mail alert sent out today, OutFront Minnesota offers the following advice to Catholics receiving the bishops’ DVD.

If you are one of the 800,000 Minnesota Catholics [that the bishops are] targeting with this message of exclusion, intolerance and discrimination you can send him a powerful message about his misguided priorities by writing “RETURN TO SENDER” on the DVD and leaving it in your mailbox.


Good advice if ever I heard it.


Recommended Off-site Links:
A Defense of Same-Sex Marriage – Daniel Maguire (Catholics for Marriage Equality, February 3, 2010).
Do Religions Reject Gay Marriage? – Daniel Maguire (Consortimnews.com, August 18, 2010).
Young Catholics Will Change the Church on Gay Rights – Michael A. Jones (GayRights.org, September 15, 2010).


See also the related Wild Reed posts:
The Minnesota Bishops’ Last Ditch Effort
A Message for NOM
Archbishop Nienstedt Calls (Again) for a Marriage Amendment to the MN Constitution
Archbishop Nienstedt’s Unconvincing Argument
Archbishop Nienstedt Has It Wrong
Distinguishing Between Roman Catholic Theology and Civil Law in the Struggle for Marriage Equality
Dale Carpenter on the “Win-Win” Reality of Gay Marriage
At UST, a Rousing and Very Catholic Show of Support for Same-Sex Marriage
Minnesotans Rally for Equality and Love at the State Capitol
A Catholic Voice for Marriage Equality at the State Capitol


Sunday, September 19, 2010

Reflections on the Life and Legacy of John Henry Newman


To mark the pope’s beatification of John Henry Newman today in Birmingham, England, I share a number of reflections on the life and legacy of Newman. All but one of these have been published in the last few weeks. I begin with an excerpt from theologian and author Paul Lakeland’s keynote address at yesterday’s Synod of The Baptized: “Claiming Our Place at the Table” in Minneapolis, and end with an excerpt from Pope Benedict’s homily at today's Mass of Beatification for Newman.

_________________________________


In some ways we could think of Newman as a sort of patron saint of this [Synod of the Baptized], even as a forerunner of this event. Yes, he was a priest, not a layperson, but when he was asked about the significance of the laity he said to his fellow priests, “We would look foolish without them.” And although Pope Benedict certainly knows Newman’s famous dictum that “to live is to change, and to be perfect is to change often,” I wonder if he knows that Newman described the papacy of his day, that of Pius IX, as “a climax of tyranny.” The Holy See, Newman said, “was once the court of ultimate appeal,” not “the extreme centralization which now is in use.”

Isn’t it reassuring that someone can say these things and still be beatified?

– Paul Lakeland
From his keynote address at the
Synod of the Baptized: “Claiming Our Place at the Table,”
Minneapolis, September 18, 2010




In terms of the inner politics of contemporary Catholicism, Newman himself was a liberal, and his vision of a healthy church was in many respects the antithesis of Pope Benedict’s. Though punctiliously loyal to the papacy, Newman was a vocal opponent of the definition of papal infallibility in 1870, which he thought unnecessary and a burden to consciences. He denounced the “aggressive and insolent faction” of Ultramontanes who centralised Catholicism too much on Rome. He deplored clericalism, worked to create an educated and active laity, and argued for greater freedom for theology within the church. “Truth,” he wrote, “is wrought out by many minds, working together freely.” He detested, and himself suffered from, trigger-happy dogmatists who tried to pre-empt intellectual exploration by invoking pat formulae and ecclesiastical denunciations. Structures of authority gave the church strength, he conceded, but did not give it life: “We are not born of bones and muscle.” Truth was objective, but had to be sought out by the heart and conscience as well as by the head, and he took as his motto as a cardinal the phrase of St Francis de Sales, “Heart speaks to heart.”

– Eamon Duffy
“Man of Sacristy” Walks in Shadow of John Paul II
The Irish Times September 8, 2010




For me, Newman is an obvious case for sainthood. His life was one of simplicity, sacrifice and conscientious study. He was fearless in the cause of his beliefs and tireless in promoting them. He foresaw, accurately, the impact of a society that decides, to borrow a phrase from Alastair Campbell, not to do God.

– Ann Widdecombe
A Man of Deep Religious Courage
The Telegraph (United Kingdom) September 11, 2010




There are so many stories about [Newman's] warmth and charity it is hard to know where to begin. But here is one. The workers at the nearby Cadbury chocolate works (mostly women) were expected to attend daily Bible classes. The local parish priest forbade Catholics to attend. An appeal was made to Newman to overrule him.

Although he had been ill, and was only a year from his death (he was nearly 90 years old), and although the snow was thick on the ground, he drove straight to Bournville to see the Cadbury brothers (who were Quakers). The brothers were “charmed by the loving Christian spirit with which he entered into the question”; as a result, they set aside a room for Catholic prayers.

– William Oddie
The Lie that Newman was Cold and Aloof Needs to Be Hit on the Head
The Catholic Herald September 2, 2010




The greatest controversy over the soon-to-be-saint . . . may be his intense relationship with his long-time friend Ambrose St. John. “As far as this world was concerned, I was his first and last . . . he was my earthly light,” wrote Newman. Before his death in 1890, Newman made an unusual and strongly worded request. “I wish, with all my heart, to be buried in Fr Ambrose St. John’s grave - and I give this as my last, my imperative will,” he wrote. As a result, he is beloved among some in the gay community, who often claim him as one of their own.

– James Martin, SJ
Whose Saint is John Henry Newman?
Boston Globe May 7, 2009




On a wet October day in 2008, an assortment of priests and grave-diggers arrived at the cemetery in Rednal, armed with shovels and a mechanical digger. They planned to transfer Newman’s remains to a tomb back at his church in Birmingham. Nothing was found except the brass name-plate and a few bits of rotten wood. A solution to the mystery was discovered in the archives of the Birmingham Post. A journalist at the burial reported that, on Newman’s orders, the grave was filled with compost to hasten decomposition. His corpse . . . had apparently dissolved into the soil. He had cheated the relic hunters.

– John Cornwell
The Papal Hijacking of Cardinal Newman
The Financial Times (London) September 10, 2010




I have no doubt at all that the attempt to dig up Newman's bones and place them in a separate shrine [from the remains of Ambrose St. John] had a strong homophobic undercurrent. Imagine the discomfort of many magisterially inclined Catholics who buy into the church's hostility to gay human beings heading to Newman's grave to venerate his remains and having to confront, in the burial site itself, the disconcerting memory of his marriage to Ambrose St. John.

And so Newman has worked a miracle, it seems to me, by disappearing in death, by escaping the grasping hands of church officials intent on burying the evidence of his love for St. John, by commingling his flesh with that of St. John in the English earth in which they are buried together, so that the church officials intent on separating them cannot possibly know what atom of dust belongs to the blessed and what to the man he loved. And so that the church officials so intent on separating the lovers must now leave them alone, and leave those who wish to venerate the blessed free to visit their shared grave, if they wish to pray at the spot where this gay saint is buried.

And these reflections are really what, I suppose, I'm winding around to saying yet again as the beatification ceremony nears: John Henry Newman lived and died a gay man. Indubitably so. And that experience is part and parcel of both his legacy and of his magnificent theological heritage. He enjoyed a long-standing committed relationship of love with another man, which he regarded as a marriage. He explicitly asked that he be buried with the man he loved.

The choice to beatify Newman is the choice to beatify a gay saint. It is a choice to beatify a man whose every word about redemptive love is imbued with the loving gay sensibility of a gay man who loved another man intensely and with devotion.




It does seem that Newman was not interested in the Church finding and restoring his physical remains. Perhaps on some level he knew that there was nothing he could do about his ideas, so he asserted his only control about those ideas through his burial--side by side with his beloved companion with no relics left to be manipulated for the 'sainthood industry'. Newman's final message seems to be about the supremacy of the love in his life, and this was not to be overshadowed by the veneration or manipulation of his ideas or his physical body. Truly a message from the grave, but probably not one we will hear from Pope Benedict.

– Colleen Kochivar-Baker
When An Event Admission Ticket is Not An Event Admission Ticket
Enlightened Catholicism September 13, 2010




The debates about Newman are sure to continue long after he is beatified, in part because he is so beloved of so many different Catholics (and Christians of all stripes). . . . Moreover, internal debate is perhaps as much the hallmark of the modern church as anything – and Newman embodies that.

– David Gibson
Pope Benedict to Beatify a Gay Saint? A Conservative Icon? Maybe Both
PoliticsDaily.com September 18, 2010




Cardinal Newman’s motto, Cor ad cor loquitur, or "Heart speaks unto heart", gives us an insight into his understanding of the Christian life as a call to holiness, experienced as the profound desire of the human heart to enter into intimate communion with the Heart of God. He reminds us that faithfulness to prayer gradually transforms us into the divine likeness. As he wrote in one of his many fine sermons, "a habit of prayer, the practice of turning to God and the unseen world in every season, in every place, in every emergency – prayer, I say, has what may be called a natural effect in spiritualizing and elevating the soul. A [person] is no longer what [he/she] was before; gradually . . . [he/she] has imbibed a new set of ideas, and become imbued with fresh principles" (Parochial and Plain Sermons, iv, 230-231).

– Pope Benedict XVI
From his homily at the Mass for the
Beatification of Blessed John Henry Newman
Cofton Park, Birmingham
September 19, 2010




Recommended Off-site Links:
Pope’s Visit Culminates with Beatification of Cardinal Newman - Stephen Bates (The Guardian, September 19, 2010).
Pope Benedict Leads Beatification Mass for Cardinal Newman As Thousands Gather to Farewell Pontiff - Daily Mail (September 19, 2010).
Pope Benedict XVI's Opponents - BBC News (September 15, 2010).
The Queer Cost of Becoming a Saint: John Henry Newman - Kittredge Cherry (Jesus in Love Blog, September 21, 2010).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
John Cornwell on the "Pontifical Hijacking" of Cardinal Newman
"Something Very Newmanesque"
Poor John
Anwser to a Troubled Liberal