Monday, February 18, 2019

Saying “No” to Trump’s “Patently Illegal Power Grab”


This past Saturday, February 16, I joined with several hundred others for a rally and march against President Donald Trump's declaration of a State of Emergency by which he intends funding the building of a wall on the southern U.S./Mexico border.

Those who rallied on Saturday view the building of this wall, a pet project of Trump since his presidential campaign in 2016, as an appeal to his base and as a means of further promoting his racist, anti-immigrant agenda.



Saturday's rally and march took place in south Minneapolis and was hosted by MIRAC (Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee) and a number of other Twin Cities-based organizations, including the Anti-War Committee, Women Against Military Madness (WAMM), Immigrant Movement for Justice, Minnesota Caravan Solidarity, and Students for a Democratic Society at UMN.

Accompanying my photos of Saturday's event, is Julia Conley's February 15 Common Dreams article, "Calling Emergency Declaration a 'Patently Illegal Power Grab,' ACLU Sues Trump."

President Donald Trump's prediction that he'll be taken to court over his national emergency declaration proved correct on Friday afternoon, with the ACLU announcing it would file one of several lawsuits against the Trump administration over the "blatantly illegal" move.

The organization noted in a statement that the president openly admitted the national emergency declaration, which he made to obtain funding for a wall at the southern U.S. border is unnecessary—bolstering the ACLU's case.

"By the president's very own admission in the Rose Garden, there is no national emergency," said executive director Anthony Romero. "He just grew impatient and frustrated with Congress, and decided to move along his promise for a border wall 'faster.' This is a patently illegal power grab that hurts American communities and flouts the checks and balances that are hallmarks of our democracy."

Cecillia Wang, deputy legal director for the group, outlined how the president's declaration violates U.S. law in a video posted to Twitter.

"The president's action in declaring this bogus national emergency is...illegal and dangerously strikes at the heart of our democracy and our checks and balances because Congress has already enacted our laws that describe exactly when a president can declare a national emergency," said Wang. "Because there is no emergency—only the one in President Trump's head for his own political purposes—he has violated our American laws."

The ACLU is building a case arguing that Trump's use of the emergency declaration to evade Congressional funding rules is "unprecedented" as well as unconstitutional:

10 U.S.C. § 2808, the emergency power that Trump has invoked, cannot be used to build a border wall. Congress restricted the use of that power to military construction projects, like overseas military airfields in wartime, that "are necessary to support" the emergency use of armed forces.

The group plans to file the suit early next week, Romero said.

Other groups challenging Trump's action include Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), whose suit is aimed at obtaining documents related to the White House decision,and Public Citizen, suing on behalf of landowners and an environmental group located along the Texas border.

Protect Democracy and the Niskanen Center are also filing a lawsuit on behalf of El Paso County and the Border Network for Human Rights, arguing that "there is no legal basis for issuing" an emergency declaration and accusing Trump of presiding over the country as an autocrat.

"Throughout history, autocrats have used so-called emergency powers to seize control from democratic systems that don't yield to their will," said Kristy Parker, co-counsel for the pending lawsuit. "Often, they have invented fake crises for this purpose and we should all be extremely alarmed that President Trump has reached for this tool in the autocrat's toolkit."

"Thankfully, our founders also knew that the seizing of legislative powers by the executive was, in the words of James Madison, 'the very definition of tyranny' and made it unlawful," she added. "It's unlawful here and we look forward to the courts upholding our framers' vision."

– Julia Conley
Common Dreams
Fenruary 15, 2019















Related Off-site Links:
A Weak and Rambling President Declares a Fake National Emergency – John Cassidy (The New Yorker, February 15, 2019).
Trump Is Our One-Man National Emergency – Michael Winship (Common Dreams, February 17, 2019).
Why We Must Stop an Unstable Trump and His Dangerous National Emergency Declaration – Robert Weissman (Common Dreams, February 15, 2019).
Trump’s Emergency Declaration Shows He Is Unfit for Office – Jonathan Chait (New York Magazine, February 15, 2019).
Troops Do Not View Immigration as a ‘National Emergency.’ Not Even Close – Joshua Axelrod (Military Times, February 15, 2019).

See also the previous Wild Reed posts:
A Prayer for Asylum Seekers Being Tear-Gassed at the Border
Opposing the Trump Administration's Inhumane Treatment of Immigrant Families
Something to Think About – November 27, 2018
"What We're Seeing Here Is a Tipping Point"
No Room for Them
Something to Think About – December 25, 2016
2000+ Take to the Streets of Minneapolis to Express Solidarity with Immigrants and Refugees
Something to Think About – December 25, 2012
Trump's America: Normalized White Supremacy and a Rising Tide of Racist Violence
Trump's Playbook
On International Human Rights Day, Saying "No" to Donald Trump and His Fascist Agenda
Progressive Perspectives on the Election of Donald Trump
Election Eve Thoughts
Carrying It On
Progressive Perspectives on the Rise of Donald Trump


No comments: